I find it more shocking that people take what they read in the papers(yes all of them) as fact when the whole agenda of a newspaper is to sell copies, each one panders towards a certain type of crowd from the working class to the toffs.Wake up call wrote:More shocking is that some people actually read the Daily Mail.
It's the most vile, racist and wrongly opinionated rag out there.
Do you believe this?
Re: Do you believe this?
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Do you believe this?
Yep, it's not racist. That's too strong a word and somewhat unfair. Some of its material can be objectionable at times but its merely pandering to an audience that already exists. The same can be said of The Sun. You might not like the business model but you can't argue that it works, given that these are the two biggest-selling newspapers in the UK.banjo wrote:I find it more shocking that people take what they read in the papers(yes all of them) as fact when the whole agenda of a newspaper is to sell copies, each one panders towards a certain type of crowd from the working class to the toffs.Wake up call wrote:More shocking is that some people actually read the Daily Mail.
It's the most vile, racist and wrongly opinionated rag out there.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Do you believe this?
Brilliant.
HAS THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT TURNED YOUR PENSION GAY?
Re: Do you believe this?
I think that is what most of the papers use nowadays.
Re: Do you believe this?
So is my 4 yr old sonHorse wrote:He is better than Margaret Hodge.MachoMan09 wrote:Whilst Frank has every right to stand for election; he is surely not the best candidate standing for that particular seat.