Dilks vs Groves

whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by whicker »

Good fight!
terrdilk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 09:56

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by terrdilk »

Wales wrote:
terrdilk wrote:
rhino222 wrote:good luck carl, but i think you will have problems against groves.... he is potentially the hardest hitter you have faced, so its not just groves who is going to have problems, you too will be in one hell of a battle.
MAte I couldn't agree more don't think for one second I thought anything else mate all I was trying to get across was I've had my chin tested all I was stating that he hasn't really that's all believe me I ave said myself he's a class act but like u said it will be a battle for the both of us :TU:

Out of interest did you face him, or any of the other "well publicised" switchover lads when you were amateur. Sutherland, de gale etc ...
No mate I didn't box any of the above as an amature to be honest I Never done anything as an amature apart from win the novice under 20s that's about it but after that my weight went up an down such to the point where I boxed at heavy while I was on the army boxing team
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by Wales »

:TU:

Best of luck.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by THEBUTCH »

I'm shocked if this match is actually signed and sealed and happens :o

This is exciting matchmaking and says a lot about Groves (and Dilks too).

:TU: all round!
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by black panther »

THEBUTCH wrote:I'm shocked if this match is actually signed and sealed and happens :o

This is exciting matchmaking and says a lot about Groves (and Dilks too).

:TU: all round!
'Nuff said mate! :TU: Should be a great fight and I don't see a problem with this fight so early in Groves career - thats one thing wrong with boxing today - its more a business where fighters try to keep their "0" rather than take 50/50 fights to help their development. No big deal if Groves loses a close fight - an early loss can actually benefit a fighter. And if he wins, what a great win for a relative novice.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Very good fight,all the best :TU:
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

the offer from hayemaker to degale was 100% genuine i believe. alot of people disagree with me but oh well. if they will fight dilks then they would deffo fight chunky
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by 15829 »

good fight for groves thinks he wins by a couple
jrh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 51
Joined: 15 Sep 2008, 09:38

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by jrh »

is says on here its a 12 rounder is a title at stake does anyone no ??
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

jrh wrote:is says on here its a 12 rounder is a title at stake does anyone no ??
it is a british title eliminator. yes its 12 rounds
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by Asterix »

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
jrh wrote:is says on here its a 12 rounder is a title at stake does anyone no ??
it is a british title eliminator. yes its 12 rounds
That's good news! :box:
avidlemon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 234
Joined: 28 Jun 2008, 10:14

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by avidlemon »

I would like to know what Smigga makes of groves going into a british title eliminator fight, bearing in mind how long Smigga had to wait for his opportunity, and if it is wise for groves to be mixing at this level right now.
There is more of a case for Dilks too, but would either of these guys, right now stand much chance if they got into the ring with a smith/dodson/quigley?
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by Asterix »

avidlemon wrote:I would like to know what Smigga makes of groves going into a british title eliminator fight, bearing in mind how long Smigga had to wait for his opportunity, and if it is wise for groves to be mixing at this level right now.
There is more of a case for Dilks too, but would either of these guys, right now stand much chance if they got into the ring with a smith/dodson/quigley?
The winner would be competitive with the names you've mentioned, even if they might not win. :TU:
avidlemon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 234
Joined: 28 Jun 2008, 10:14

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by avidlemon »

I personally have no doubt that they would be competitive, as both are reasonably talented boxers. However we know much less about groves as a pro, than we do about dilks. Groves didn't look great against his last opponent, although i am not going to run him down for that, as who looks the dogs every time out?
Dilks was unlucky in his commonwealth shot, but neither is seasoned.
I point to Don Broadhurst fighting for a british title after 11 pro fights, it did him no good at all. Being commonwealth champ and fighting your guys from africa who are unknown entities, but generally crap did not prepare him, and i don't see what prepaeration either fighter (dilks or groves) has had to warrant this step up
jrh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 51
Joined: 15 Sep 2008, 09:38

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by jrh »

really hope dilksy roes it , and open the doors for another liverpool derby that would be great
bigdaddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 504
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:46

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by bigdaddy »

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:the offer from hayemaker to degale was 100% genuine i believe. alot of people disagree with me but oh well. if they will fight dilks then they would deffo fight chunky

Load of bull all Pr why would Degale drop in money to fight groves............... May be Dilks i hope is getting the 50k :TU: :TU: :TU: Bull
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

bigdaddy wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:the offer from hayemaker to degale was 100% genuine i believe. alot of people disagree with me but oh well. if they will fight dilks then they would deffo fight chunky

Load of bull all Pr why would Degale drop in money to fight groves............... May be Dilks i hope is getting the 50k :TU: :TU: :TU: Bull
how do you know that? why would degale drp in money? what do you mean? degale isn't getting 50 grand a fight. why would dilks get 50k he is a lesser name :TU: :TU: bull
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23113
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by mickey1975 »

MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
bigdaddy wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:the offer from hayemaker to degale was 100% genuine i believe. alot of people disagree with me but oh well. if they will fight dilks then they would deffo fight chunky

Load of bull all Pr why would Degale drop in money to fight groves............... May be Dilks i hope is getting the 50k :TU: :TU: :TU: Bull
how do you know that? why would degale drp in money? what do you mean? degale isn't getting 50 grand a fight. why would dilks get 50k he is a lesser name :TU: :TU: bull
How much is Degale getting then?Olympic champions dont come cheap.
bigdaddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 504
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:46

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by bigdaddy »

mickey1975 wrote:
MrBoxingUK2 wrote:
bigdaddy wrote:
Load of bull all Pr why would Degale drop in money to fight groves............... May be Dilks i hope is getting the 50k :TU: :TU: :TU: Bull
how do you know that? why would degale drp in money? what do you mean? degale isn't getting 50 grand a fight. why would dilks get 50k he is a lesser name :TU: :TU: bull
How much is Degale getting then?Olympic champions dont come cheap.






http://www.fulhamchronicle.co.uk/london ... -25823489/
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23113
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by mickey1975 »

I would say that article suggests he is on more than 50k
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

mickey1975 wrote:I would say that article suggests he is on more than 50k
yes it seem's so. warren must losing money big time on degale. he shouldn't be on more then 10k a fight at the minute
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by leforge »

Good fight. Any news on the rest of undercard?
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by alexpaterson »

leforge wrote:Good fight. Any news on the rest of undercard?
Lee McAllister was at an Amatuer show I was at and said he was fighting on it.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by leforge »

alexpaterson wrote:
leforge wrote:Good fight. Any news on the rest of undercard?
Lee McAllister was at an Amatuer show I was at and said he was fighting on it.
A commonwealth defence?
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Dilks vs Groves

Post by alexpaterson »

leforge wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:
leforge wrote:Good fight. Any news on the rest of undercard?
Lee McAllister was at an Amatuer show I was at and said he was fighting on it.
A commonwealth defence?
Probably, it would be a good little fight to have on the PPV
Post Reply