Fighters you did not like but do now?

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by DG. »

Kevin Mitchell

Amir Khan

Both made me want to see them flattened - but not anymore!

Mitchel because he looks to back up his earlier OTT celebrations when fighting limited oppostion - good fighter these days!

Khan - he wants to fight the best and left Fwank which means he can!

:OhYes:
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Deno1986 »

Audley Harrison for some reason I can't explain - maybe I feel sorry for him more than anything.

Paulie Malignaggi is another one.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by alexpaterson »

Danny MacIntosh - For the way he dealt with defeat against Cleverly and is now going after tough fights :TU:
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by damianhucker1 »

Deno1986 wrote:Audley Harrison for some reason I can't explain - maybe I feel sorry for him more than anything.

Paulie Malignaggi is another one.
same here , i never really hated him in the way some did , he just annoyed me with all the
" this time next year ill be world champion" mullarky.
i do hope he wins the euro , just to give him some sort of respect from his career , as the olympics aside hes acheived feck all .
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Counter-puncher »

alexpaterson wrote:Danny MacIntosh - For the way he dealt with defeat against Cleverly and is now going after tough fights :TU:
:TU: x2 his interview after Clev was very classy
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by dondada »

Audley too. I don't really like him as a fighter but I do admire his bottle outside the ring for coming back from all the criticism, etc.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28507
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Coco »

I wonder if the Walsh brothers will become more popular
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by DG. »

Coco wrote:I wonder if the Walsh brothers will become more popular
No chance!

:lol:
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by alexpaterson »

Bernard Hopkins was one. I thought he spoiled a lot and didnt like watching him then I started getting really in to him (in boxing terms :DD ) his fight with Trinadad was brilliant, I then watched a lot more and really appriecated what he was doing he is a superb taction and so very clever in the ring.
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Chris W 1982 »

DG. wrote:Kevin Mitchell

Amir Khan

Both made me want to see them flattened - but not anymore!

Mitchel because he looks to back up his earlier OTT celebrations when fighting limited oppostion - good fighter these days!

Khan - he wants to fight the best and left Fwank which means he can!

:OhYes:
How do you mean "fight the best?"
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by whiskey »

Derek Chisora.

I still think he is a grade A asshole, but the man intrigues me.

Not sure it counts as 'didn't like but like now' though !
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by DG. »

The quiet man 2004 wrote:
DG. wrote:Kevin Mitchell

Amir Khan

Both made me want to see them flattened - but not anymore!

Mitchel because he looks to back up his earlier OTT celebrations when fighting limited oppostion - good fighter these days!

Khan - he wants to fight the best and left Fwank which means he can!

:OhYes:
How do you mean "fight the best?"
I think Khan wants the big name fighters, after his next fight I fully expect a unification and some good exciting fights down the line.

I realise that fighting big names does not always equal fighting the best, but he won't be fighting handpicked lower level fighter from now onwards.

I know about the Maidaina fight but as a 1st fight in the US a Malinaganagggggiii fight makes more sense, imo.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by DG. »

G0mez wrote:Derek Chisora.

I still think he is a grade A asshole, but the man intrigues me.

Not sure it counts as 'didn't like but like now' though !
I don't think you can say you like him after saying that!

:lol:
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Chris W 1982 »

Well lets be realistic about Khan.

The best fights out there for him were Maidana, Bradley and Malignaggi. Marquez is a lightweight whilst Pac and Floyd would eat him.

Now i know for a fact that Fwank had deals in place for Bradley and Maidana to come over here and i'm quite certain that Paulie would venture here too. Is your reason for admiring Khan now based on the fact he left his promoter for money or do you genuinely believe America can give him bigger fights?
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by DG. »

The quiet man 2004 wrote:Well lets be realistic about Khan.

The best fights out there for him were Maidana, Bradley and Malignaggi. Marquez is a lightweight whilst Pac and Floyd would eat him.

Now i know for a fact that Fwank had deals in place for Bradley and Maidana to come over here and i'm quite certain that Paulie would venture here too. Is your reason for admiring Khan now based on the fact he left his promoter for money or do you genuinely believe America can give him bigger fights?

Fwank only got the fights because KHAN was leaving him.

He left his Promoter because he was free to.

I think Khan has always wanted to fight the best, he might come unstuck, but he has always wanted the big fights.

AND LETS GET IT STRAIGHT - BOXING IS A BUSINESS ALSO - KHAN TOOK HIS ELSEWHERE.

In business If you can get the same job done but make more money then...change supplier.

It's business!


Shed no tears for Fwank - he would drop Khan and anyone else if he were not making money out of them.

:OhYes:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by tonyevs »

Froch is the most obvious one with me.

With that big conk, gormless features, charmless wit and his constant going on of Calzaghe :witzend: he was another Junior Witter on the scene :-?

But now he has made his own headlines he has began to drop the tedious Calzaghe thing .. :TU:
And the times he has been on the TV at boxing shows .. he has shown what a great character he can be. Also, for me, he is the best value British boxer/fighter out there :TU:
Haye, Khan, Mitchell have none of the heart Froch brings to the ring each and everytime he steps through those ropes :bow:
bad mamma jamma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 347
Joined: 15 Jun 2009, 05:31

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by bad mamma jamma »

kevin mitchell..was cocky and now seems like a good bloke

frankie gavin...seemed cocky but isnt and is a family man

dont think will ever like degale, too mouthy
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by J »

funny that mitchell seems to be a lad that everyone disliked, met him a few times (it just happened that he was an up and coming prospect when i was writing so) and to be honest the bloke has time for the fans. Didnt mind a chat and always behanved respectfully.

Vinnie had a reputation of being a loose canoon but hey havent we all been at some point in our lives, Kev always accross as a real solid nice bloke to be honest. :TU:

Be real nice to see him lift a title this year. :TU:
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by taffytoon »

Chris Eubank

Carl Froch

Tony Bellew
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by whiskey »

It's rare i dislike the person, it's more their career or stuff that gets my knickers in a twist. If a fighter is genuine, not manufactured - then that's all i would wish for.

It's the talented fighters who never do go for it, that really come in for nuclear attacks. Because it's basically assuming we are all thick or stupid enough to swallow their diatribe and believe their greatness without fighting the best.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

tonyevs wrote:Froch is the most obvious one with me.

With that big conk, gormless features, charmless wit and his constant going on of Calzaghe :
:lol:

You forgot the monotone droning voice! :TU:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by tonyevs »

Carlos-Wigan wrote:
tonyevs wrote:Froch is the most obvious one with me.

With that big conk, gormless features, charmless wit and his constant going on of Calzaghe :
:lol:

You forgot the monotone droning voice! :TU:

I didn`t want to risk offending :TU:
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Finch »

DG. wrote:Kevin Mitchell

Amir Khan

Both made me want to see them flattened - but not anymore!

Mitchel because he looks to back up his earlier OTT celebrations when fighting limited oppostion - good fighter these days!

Khan - he wants to fight the best and left Fwank which means he can!

:OhYes:
I have always quite liked Mitchell, but even more so recently. Turning into one of my favourites.

Khan I've wanted to see flattened, and was jumping for joy when Prescott floored him, then wanted to see him flattened even more when he got a world title shot after beating a bum and an old, one eyed featherweight. Having said this, I won't say I am pro Khan yet, but i do think he has improved ten fold with Freddie Roach and give him respect. Do i still wanna see him flattened? I wanna see him in a big fight with a big puncher, win or lose.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by bennie »

I never liked Hagler when he was fighting, he was always so surly. I remember Duran scoffing at him at their post-fight press conference with words to the effect of, "he wins the fight and he makes excuses." Marvin seemed bitter and his fall was always going embitter him more than (ever) others. It did, although he seems highly likeable today.
Last edited by bennie on 15 Feb 2010, 17:55, edited 1 time in total.
Ash-Weston
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 222
Joined: 04 Oct 2007, 07:20

Re: Fighters you did not like but do now?

Post by Ash-Weston »

Ricky Hatton...Actually thats the other way round

Amir Khan im getting to like now

Floyd Mayweather is a prized idiot but you cant knock his skill

Paulie Maliggnaggi for coming back and beating a decent opponent after losing to fat boy
Post Reply