Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

glahn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 992
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 13:29

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by glahn »

Hopefully Macklin and Barker will still fight a little bit further down the line when they are both at championship level and at their respective peaks as fighters.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by Autobarn »

it could e really exciting as they're both aggressive. i think we'll see macklin turn more boxer than aggressor in this fight. perhaps he'll have a good balance of both. gevor is very small for a middleweight. but very tough. it looks good for this matchup, that gevor did well vs sturm.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by leforge »

Who will headline this show now? Will go on still?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by leforge »

feargalocuinneagain wrote:
leforge wrote:Who will headline this show now? Will go on still?
Broken nose i'm guessing is six weeks to heal. Tickets were never put up on Ticketmaster so I assume it will be just postponed...... Slapbangwhallop (Sligo) will know the full details
I can imagine Hattons not wanting to lose there sky date.
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by whiteboy »

maybe matt hatton will move to this date
iwz678
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 695
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 12:30

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by iwz678 »

whiteboy wrote:maybe matt hatton will move to this date
that would suit him a lot more because he's taken the Branco fight at short notice and Small v Webb was the headliner before that fight popped up.

Gutted though we seem to be getting a lot of postponements now, not the fighters fault because this is Boxing but just very frustrating that TV viewers and the locals in Birmingham have been denied a quality fight.
Russ L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 114
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 05:29

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by Russ L »

I can't promise that it's true (or even anything approaching), but gerraloada this here (last paragraph):

http://www.badlefthook.com/2010/3/18/13 ... free-agent

These blokes reckon that Gevor had pulled out anyway and had a ninety-day option to fight the winner of Macklin vs whomever he ended up a-fighting.

If (if) that's true and Macklin can't defend in time for that, would this mean that the title is vacant? I dunno, I never understand such things.
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Russ L wrote:I can't promise that it's true (or even anything approaching), but gerraloada this here (last paragraph):

http://www.badlefthook.com/2010/3/18/13 ... free-agent

These blokes reckon that Gevor had pulled out anyway and had a ninety-day option to fight the winner of Macklin vs whomever he ended up a-fighting.

If (if) that's true and Macklin can't defend in time for that, would this mean that the title is vacant? I dunno, I never understand such things.
http://www.irish-boxing.com/stories/mar ... doubt.html
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by crusader »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
Russ L wrote:I can't promise that it's true (or even anything approaching), but gerraloada this here (last paragraph):

http://www.badlefthook.com/2010/3/18/13 ... free-agent

These blokes reckon that Gevor had pulled out anyway and had a ninety-day option to fight the winner of Macklin vs whomever he ended up a-fighting.

If (if) that's true and Macklin can't defend in time for that, would this mean that the title is vacant? I dunno, I never understand such things.
http://www.irish-boxing.com/stories/mar ... doubt.html
Shame. This bout was going to be action packed and was very evenly matched. Gevor is a world class opponent, so this was more than a regular defense of the European title.

I'm guessing Roach is talking about the Chudinov's?
Russ L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 114
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 05:29

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by Russ L »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
Russ L wrote:I can't promise that it's true (or even anything approaching), but gerraloada this here (last paragraph):

http://www.badlefthook.com/2010/3/18/13 ... free-agent

These blokes reckon that Gevor had pulled out anyway and had a ninety-day option to fight the winner of Macklin vs whomever he ended up a-fighting.

If (if) that's true and Macklin can't defend in time for that, would this mean that the title is vacant? I dunno, I never understand such things.
http://www.irish-boxing.com/stories/mar ... doubt.html
That re-affirms what we knew further up the thread but doesn't answer the question. I will rephrase it: If Gevor was meant to fight the winner of Macklin vs X within 90 days but now Macklin can't fight, will Matty be stripped?
Pongsaklek
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 135
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:06

Re: Matthew Macklin vs. Khoren Gevor

Post by Pongsaklek »

Gevor has won his contract dispute with Universum and is a free agent now.
Post Reply