When attempting to match fighters with armageto please do not use any swear words and insultive language. Geto gets very upset by sim banter so let's keep it between us grown ups. He used a bit of name calling as an excuse not to match our fighters.
When matching with his fighters always use your "please" and "thank you's". Never use words such as noob, fvck, duck and coward. This will result in temper tantrums and soiled nappies. If you do not do so he will not fight your fighters and wail and cry for weeks on end.
Please let's treat him nicely, he is a very sensitive soul.
BOXRECSIM NOTICE (PLEASE READ AND ABIDE BY)
Re: BOXRECSIM NOTICE (PLEASE READ AND ABIDE BY)
Or the reason why the rematch didn't happen was because you didn't want to fight Charles?!?!?
Facts:
1. When Calzaghe had the belt, you said you would face Charles as a mando and not before. Meaning you would only fight him IF you had to.
2. When Charles had the option, he went for the tougher fight with TJF. That is the only reason you got the belt you lost trying to unify. If we fought Hill, you would have been out of the title picture.
3. You said Bivens was running from you, when in fact I just wasn't on the forum for a few days. I agreed to the fight.
4. Bivens stopped Calzaghe and you went crying for a rematch, claiming people were running. To silence your mouth, I said Calzaghe WOULD get his rematch with Bivens, but had to face Charles the week before. Win or lose against Charles, you would have gotten your Bivens rematch the next week, or even after that of you wanted to put it off. YOU DECLINED.
5. You ducked Charles twice
6. TJF will face you because he knows Calzaghe has no power and no shot to win
7. You have no balls
Facts:
1. When Calzaghe had the belt, you said you would face Charles as a mando and not before. Meaning you would only fight him IF you had to.
2. When Charles had the option, he went for the tougher fight with TJF. That is the only reason you got the belt you lost trying to unify. If we fought Hill, you would have been out of the title picture.
3. You said Bivens was running from you, when in fact I just wasn't on the forum for a few days. I agreed to the fight.
4. Bivens stopped Calzaghe and you went crying for a rematch, claiming people were running. To silence your mouth, I said Calzaghe WOULD get his rematch with Bivens, but had to face Charles the week before. Win or lose against Charles, you would have gotten your Bivens rematch the next week, or even after that of you wanted to put it off. YOU DECLINED.
5. You ducked Charles twice
6. TJF will face you because he knows Calzaghe has no power and no shot to win
7. You have no balls
Re: BOXRECSIM NOTICE (PLEASE READ AND ABIDE BY)
In a related story, Rosenbloom has defeated Calzaghe, and Held Charles at bay when challenged.
Re: BOXRECSIM NOTICE (PLEASE READ AND ABIDE BY)
1: The willingness was still there from us. Everyone has a time, yours would have came if it was a mando or not.
2: You went for the tougher fight, so what. We have been there and done it with the unification bouts. We don't owe you any favours as it was proved Calzaghe was more than capable of winning titles beforehand, something your fighters are not.
3: Excuses, excuses. Not on the forum for a few days? Did you have to do your nails you big ponce?
4: Actually we made a proposal and you rejected. You attempted to throw Charles in front of the ass whipping Calzaghe was AGAIN going to hand Bivens. Two knockdowns and a handy lead on all three judges scorecards is a FACT.
5: No we didn't. We chose to defend against Rosenbloom first, there is an order as with the champion today. Just because you were not first you threw a tantrum and cried. The second time we chose to make unification which is far more important than dealing with a fighter who has never even had a sniff of a title. (that goes for both of your fighters btw just in case you needed reminding.)
6: TJF will fight Calzaghe again because there is a great rivalry and we are a former two time world champion with a history of fighting the best. Sav has got to be respected. His unbeaten run with TJF is incredible and he is definitely in the HOF for this. He has consistently fought the best and will continue to do so. We give him huge credit despite our history, something you don't deserve an ounce of.
7: Gay
2: You went for the tougher fight, so what. We have been there and done it with the unification bouts. We don't owe you any favours as it was proved Calzaghe was more than capable of winning titles beforehand, something your fighters are not.
3: Excuses, excuses. Not on the forum for a few days? Did you have to do your nails you big ponce?
4: Actually we made a proposal and you rejected. You attempted to throw Charles in front of the ass whipping Calzaghe was AGAIN going to hand Bivens. Two knockdowns and a handy lead on all three judges scorecards is a FACT.
5: No we didn't. We chose to defend against Rosenbloom first, there is an order as with the champion today. Just because you were not first you threw a tantrum and cried. The second time we chose to make unification which is far more important than dealing with a fighter who has never even had a sniff of a title. (that goes for both of your fighters btw just in case you needed reminding.)
6: TJF will fight Calzaghe again because there is a great rivalry and we are a former two time world champion with a history of fighting the best. Sav has got to be respected. His unbeaten run with TJF is incredible and he is definitely in the HOF for this. He has consistently fought the best and will continue to do so. We give him huge credit despite our history, something you don't deserve an ounce of.
7: Gay
Re: BOXRECSIM NOTICE (PLEASE READ AND ABIDE BY)
i only read 7.
fewer
fewer