Lightheavy 20's vs 40's

Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Lightheavy 20's vs 40's

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

dempseyfire wrote:Even though I view Charles as the greater fighter I actually have to go with Tunney in a head to head. I think Tunney was able to stick to a disciplined fight plan better than Ezzard and that would prove the difference in a very even matchup. Wish there was more footage of Charles though in his 175 prime.
Don't know if I'll ever see someone give him a, "10% chance" against Charles again if I live to be 100. That is just obscene.
Panzerfaust
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 17:13

Re: Lightheavy 20's vs 40's

Post by Panzerfaust »

For me , the Charles-Tunney fight would be a coin toss . I see it as wide open . I think Charles would handle Greb pretty well, just as Tunney did in some of their later encounters.
Greb vs Moore, does Greb outwork Moore or Moore land the ko?
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Re: Lightheavy 20's vs 40's

Post by Ambling Alp »

I think Greb would probably win a decision the first time they would have fought. However, Moore would probably adjust and win in subsequent meetings.
Post Reply