concured lets see him against captain hucktoppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
Greens Response to Roy
Re: Greens Response to Roy
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Greens Response to Roy
No response from the yanks - just a slanging match between Aussies!amwsnw wrote:Can this be posted on current scene ?? Would be great to see the response forn the yanks...
Re: Greens Response to Roy
Adamj1987 wrote:concured lets see him against captain hucktoppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
Why is Huck ranked in front of Cunningham, in spite of Cunningham having KOed him?
Re: Greens Response to Roy
Hear, hear!Adamj1987 wrote:concured lets see him against captain hucktoppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
Re: Greens Response to Roy
Even after my last post, Ive got to add, Steve Cunningham is the Cruiserweight champion at the moment, reguardless of title held. Huck, though, is a much better prospect than an over the hill, over hyped, blown up middle weight.Brute wrote:Adamj1987 wrote:concured lets see him against captain hucktoppity wrote:danny needs to leave these has-beens behind and go have a meaningful fight.
Why is Huck ranked in front of Cunningham, in spite of Cunningham having KOed him?
Re: Greens Response to Roy
dberry wrote:Even after my last post, Ive got to add, Steve Cunningham is the Cruiserweight champion at the moment, regardless of title held. Huck, though, is a much better prospect than an over the hill, over hyped, blown up middle weight.Brute wrote:Adamj1987 wrote: concured lets see him against captain huck
Why is Huck ranked in front of Cunningham, in spite of Cunningham having KOed him?