Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Reading in Boxing News that Tony Quigley has been nominated to face Kenny Anderson in an eliminator for the British Title.
Has Dilks pulled out so he can challenge Groves?????
Has Dilks pulled out so he can challenge Groves?????
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Anderson's had first dibs at the shot for a while, can't speak for why Quigley's got it.
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Anderson's been in the position for what seems like a lifetime. I was under the impression that Quigley was going to be campaigning at Middleweight
Surprised Dilks has removed himself from the running for a British crack. A shot at Smith in front of the Echo Arena crowd is surely more lucrative then facing Groves for the Commonwealth.
Surprised Dilks has removed himself from the running for a British crack. A shot at Smith in front of the Echo Arena crowd is surely more lucrative then facing Groves for the Commonwealth.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
it seems like Paul David has been pulling out of fights with Anderson for at least a year....
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
David's been nominated to face Tony Dodson for the English title.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
i heard that Dilks rejected thefight .Paul david pulled out twiuce ,so kenny really should have been made mandatory tbh ,but he will face dodson now .
-
kevinmaree
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 27
- Joined: 06 Sep 2009, 16:16
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Yep Kenny will fight Quigley next in a final eliminator.
Dilks will fight groves from what i believe
Its a fight we are really looking forward to, exciting times in the supermiddleweight division
Dilks will fight groves from what i believe
Its a fight we are really looking forward to, exciting times in the supermiddleweight division
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
quigley will be to strong for anderson
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
First I ave heard here boy I never pulled out of anything to my knowlage
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Just going from what I read in Boxing News this morning mate.terrdilk wrote:First I ave heard here boy I never pulled out of anything to my knowlage
All the Board news is in there
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Mate iv rejected no fight with Anderson mate so who ever told u it telling tom peppersAlba wrote:i heard that Dilks rejected thefight .Paul david pulled out twiuce ,so kenny really should have been made mandatory tbh ,but he will face dodson now .
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
quigley lost his title in a controversial decision,which lead to fw even grabbing the mic to announce a rematch.when does he do that :!:as for anderson he's been in line for a while & david who's been crying out he's been ducked etc has pulled out on many occasions.
dilks is further down the pecking order, & has challenged groves before the adamu fight, not sure if he'll still want it.
dilks is further down the pecking order, & has challenged groves before the adamu fight, not sure if he'll still want it.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Come on mate of course I still want it mate I'm ready an waiting for the datehurlock wrote:quigley lost his title in a controversial decision,which lead to fw even grabbing the mic to announce a rematch.when does he do that :!:as for anderson he's been in line for a while & david who's been crying out he's been ducked etc has pulled out on many occasions.
dilks is further down the pecking order, & has challenged groves before the adamu fight, not sure if he'll still want it.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
ok
DD good to hear :!: styles make fights.
-
Jeff Thomas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Belter, lets see.diggler wrote:quigley will be to strong for anderson
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
quigley can always drop down to middleweight
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
plus everyone knows he had no buisness being anywhere near a boxing ring against cleverly
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
i think the board have done the correct thing in making a final eliminator coz quigley gave smith a hard fight and deserves another shot if he beats anderson.this will be a very good fight with quigley very busy and anderson possesing his powerAlba wrote:i heard that Dilks rejected thefight .Paul david pulled out twiuce ,so kenny really should have been made mandatory tbh ,but he will face dodson now .
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?hurlock wrote:anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
billy nelson wrote:simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?hurlock wrote:anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
you dont think kenny anderson could beat degale ?
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Alba wrote:i think james could have to much for kenny,although if kenny connects properly its goodnight dick!billy nelson wrote:simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?hurlock wrote: anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
you dont think kenny anderson could beat degale ?
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
Quigley can drop back down to middleweight, his natural weight and Anderson can get involved in fights with David, Dodson and Dilks and make another run at some titles. I really don't believe that a couple of losses should end your career. Look at some of the records of fighters in old times and they are littered with losses, although admittedly they fought more often.billy nelson wrote:simply because neither of these two guys are going to beat the likes of james degale imo if and when they were to meet,so you tell me were the loser of this contest can go?hurlock wrote:anderson is undefeated??? quigley lost to a very good fighter in cleverley & a close contested one to smith :!:billy nelson wrote:imo thers no stonger SMW than Anderson,im not saying the most skilled but he does have the equalisers in both hands,great fight this one with the loser having to think seriously about there career.
consider there career's :!: comments like this are pathetic.the two fighters in question are great too watch.why should we lose a fighter because they sufferd a loss
Re: Quigley/Anderson in Eliminator. Why no Dilks?
losing means nothing,depending on the fashion of the loss & what effect it has on the fighters health.apart from that there are some really close & good contest's in this division.