smith v simpson

hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: smith v simpson

Post by hurlock »

john simpson is very underestimated & been unlucky at times,but stephen smith is a class act & i think he'll be prepared to tough it out with the best of them. its gonna be educational & stand him in good stead.id of liked to see him get a few more rds personally but he's good enough to be let of the leash.
smith UD or ko 9-10 rds.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Dioufy »

Simpson is the British barometer. If Smith can't beat him then he will struggle to go past British standards. If he beats him wide on points, then that's awesome. If he stops him then he's one to really watch out for.

But for me, it will be a 116-112 type win for Smith.
idle talk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 246
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 11:56

Re: smith v simpson

Post by idle talk »

What a fight!! This is swiftys big chance to prove himself :OhYes:
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: smith v simpson

Post by jBacca »

Dioufy wrote:Simpson is the British barometer. If Smith can't beat him then he will struggle to go past British standards. If he beats him wide on points, then that's awesome. If he stops him then he's one to really watch out for.

But for me, it will be a 116-112 type win for Smith.
I agree with you.
Arnie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Arnie »

This is Frankie! Billy I will bet u 50quid on a smith win I will give u 2 to 1
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: smith v simpson

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

anybody know who trains smith and who trains simpson?
MrBoxingUK2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 19 Nov 2009, 14:13

Re: smith v simpson

Post by MrBoxingUK2 »

Dioufy wrote:Simpson is the British barometer. If Smith can't beat him then he will struggle to go past British standards. If he beats him wide on points, then that's awesome. If he stops him then he's one to really watch out for.

But for me, it will be a 116-112 type win for Smith.
simpson is improving leaps and bounds, i wouldn't say he is the british barometer, lindsay wants nothing to do with him, i can see john picking up a european title at some stage in his career. :TU:
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: smith v simpson

Post by neil hibbert »

smith is in the vaughn camp based in liverpool and as far as i know simpson is trained in the fighting scots gym under billy nelson but i could be wrong about simpson :TU:
sgtcecil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 979
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 14:38

Re: smith v simpson

Post by sgtcecil »

Cant wait for this, simpson is my favourite domestic boxer. Simpson to win in later rounds. If if goes to the cards, hopefully the judges will be a bit fairer than when he fought matthews in liverpool!

It amazed me that matthews got 2 points deducted and was knocked down in 1st of that fight but larry o'connell managed to score 118 points to derry!
ste harkin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 44
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 04:56

Re: smith v simpson

Post by ste harkin »

idle talk wrote:What a fight!! This is swiftys big chance to prove himself :OhYes:
I agree what a fight!! i think ste will grab the chance with both hands!! good luck $wifty :TU:
idle talk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 246
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 11:56

Re: smith v simpson

Post by idle talk »

hopefully mate! great fight. come on swifty!! :box:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Counter-puncher »

eff me, great matchup.

like most on here I've been looking forward to swifty stepping up and equally i am surprised its so quick

agree with the poster who says Simpson could just win a euro title some day (in right circumstances)

good luck swifty
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Counter-puncher »

mickey1975 wrote:Cannot believe this to be honest.I know $wifty is highly thought of,but could they be rushing him?Truscott is a superb boxer(lacking power),and Simpson may well have ruined him.I will be backing Stephen,but am amazed Fwank has allowed this match so soon.Get Gavin in with Daws and we could be seeing a change in the approach of alledgedly
alright mickey, swifty's got all the skill Trusscott's got, but he punches a LOT harder, so while the match is braver than we're used to with FW, then as with Gavin-Daws (if that is a fight thats also being put on, and IMO Frankie schools Daws) its a very much calculated risk IMO :TU:
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5456
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: smith v simpson

Post by forcefraser »

Great fight, looking forward to it big time.

Tough one to call. Simpson is a seasoned fighter, who has come on a lot in the last couple of years. He really took Truscott to school, the hard way.

Swifty looks the business, but it will be a fair step us from previous proffesional opposition. I have not seen that much of Swifty to be fair, but from I`ve seen he has plenty of skill, but maybe lacks a real power punch as he goes up the levels?

If he can can get past Simpson, then he will have really arrived on the British scene. Just hope we get a good fight and not a technical decision due to cuts.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Counter-puncher »

forcefraser wrote:. I have not seen that much of Swifty to be fair, but from I`ve seen he has plenty of skill, but maybe lacks a real power punch as he goes up the levels?

.
we'll have to see if the power carries up as he goes up in levels but from 20 metres away or so, when you hear the impact of his shots, they certainly sound pretty damn convincing! :TU:
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5456
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: smith v simpson

Post by forcefraser »

Counter-puncher wrote:
forcefraser wrote:. I have not seen that much of Swifty to be fair, but from I`ve seen he has plenty of skill, but maybe lacks a real power punch as he goes up the levels?

.
we'll have to see if the power carries up as he goes up in levels but from 20 metres away or so, when you hear the impact of his shots, they certainly sound pretty damn convincing! :TU:
Hope so. Speed and skills are obviously paramount, but real power is what you need to turn a fight at world level.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: smith v simpson

Post by whicker »

Credit to Simpson, too- he very rarely has "soft touch" fights (ie Africans)

This looks to have be a very credible Commonwealth Title reign.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: smith v simpson

Post by 15829 »

ive seen him on the pads and at his fight he certainly carries a punch
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Deno1986 »

I'm looking forward to seeing Smith after all the hype on this thread, still havn't seen him box. Simpson is one tough, experienced fella so to beat him, Smith is going to have to be good.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: smith v simpson

Post by 15829 »

heres his last fight not much to judge tho


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlt1aXcNmhg
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: smith v simpson

Post by Deno1986 »

diggler wrote:heres his last fight not much to judge tho


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlt1aXcNmhg
Impressive enough, really like that bodywork . Good to see him fighting mostly domestic opposition aswell. Hopefully Simpson isn't to soon for him.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: smith v simpson

Post by billy nelson »

Arnie wrote:This is Frankie! Billy I will bet u 50quid on a smith win I will give u 2 to 1
frankie it's a deal! then i will buy you a beer coz i know how you hate parting with money lol
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: smith v simpson

Post by alexpaterson »

Should be a cracker and such a tough fight for both. I slightly favour Simpson, I think he'll be too expierenced and relentless for Smith.
derry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 18:05

Re: smith v simpson

Post by derry »

swifty is a diffrent level of fighter dont get me wrong john has improved under billy as he is a top coach , but ste is the best featherweight out there trust me have sparred many of rounds with him and been in with the rest , over the next 12 months britain will relise they have a new supperstar in swifty ,,, so am goin for swifty late stoppage .
good luck bro and see u soon x
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: smith v simpson

Post by bennie »

John Simpson enjoys a rare home appearance when he defends his Commonwealth featherweight title at the legendary Kelvin Hall in Glasgow against big Liverpool prospect Stephen Smith on July 17.
The battler-hardened, gritty, sharp-punching Simpson is one of the best 'away' fighters in the business and lifted the Commonwealth belt with a stoppage of Middlesbrough's previously unbeaten Paul Truscott in Middlesbrough last year, a title he has retained twice since, including another stoppage of Truscott in Middlesbrough.
The tough Scot will prove hard to topple but the unbeaten Smith, a former brilliant amateur and younger brother of British super-middleweight champ Paul, looks a bit special and has done everything right in his paid career to date, with 10 fights, 10 win, six of then early. Smith poses a threat to just about anyone and is rapidly running out of non-title opposition, which explains this crack. Has it come too early? It looks 60-40 in Simpson's favour, who has seen off many a fancied prospect before and will have the crowd on his side on a bill that also features fellow Scots Ricky Burns and Willie Limond.
Post Reply