He's always up to some deviousness, either drafting the best to fight his way to the top, using brilliant strategery to wile his way past the good people, or paying someone under the table to make it appear that he is somehow just as good as anyone else. Or worst of all going by the rules as they have been stated. None of these actions are anything to be proud of.
Is it time for him to go? Shall he roam these halls No more? We don't want "his kind" 'round these parts?
Or is he a "Maverick", a briliiant guidesmith? "One of a kind smart fella"? An inspiration to all?
You decide!
If the vote goes the wrong way, I'll retire. I'm older than any three of you put together anyway. If not, you'll get more chances to have your guys beaten to smithereens via my mysitical far east specialized training methods, combined with the ancient old fashioned GBP Yankee, can do, common sense.
Remember you can participate vs a GBP fighter, but you can't really compete with them.
BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
is this an attempt at sympathy buzz? fvck no you shouldnt retire. you should, however show some sac and stop ducking every challenge thrown your way.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Yes, display balls.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
jBacca wrote:Yes, display balls.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Our great fighter Max deserves and will receive a tune up fight for the finale. If there were balls around here Moore would be facing the #1 challenger this week, and this would be put to bed. However due to lack of balls, our fighter gets an easy one, and then Moore or the champion must face the #1 contender which may or may not be Max.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. Learn to cope.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. Learn to cope.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
If there were balls around here, Slapsie would have fought Tunney in weeks 1 through to 38.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
I vote Buzz as the best manager in the Sim, the very fabric of SimSociety would crumble without him.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Now there you go....There goes a feller who has learned to deal with lifes ups and downs, the good the bad and the ugly, and does not require a feminine napkin to deal with it.jBacca wrote:If there were balls around here, Slapsie would have fought Tunney in weeks 1 through to 38.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
Now if Max were champion, he would face Tunney, just as we mentioned from the git go. We just don't think a HW champ has much business here. Nothing personal, we feel the same about Tommy Burns and Jimmy Braddock.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Buzz, you can throw that one out all you like, but you know that Tunney largely campaigned at LHW and only fought a few at HW.BoxBuzz wrote:Now there you go....There goes a feller who has learned to deal with lifes ups and downs, the good the bad and the ugly, and does not require a feminine napkin to deal with it.jBacca wrote:If there were balls around here, Slapsie would have fought Tunney in weeks 1 through to 38.
It's just the way it is. It's not always fair. I learned to cope.
Now if Max were champion, he would face Tunney, just as we mentioned from the git go. We just don't think a HW champ has much business here. Nothing personal, we feel the same about Tommy Burns and Jimmy Braddock.
You're now dubbed 'the Running Man', or ...
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
By the way when it was needed, Max beat both Braddock and Burns. Tunney? Just another notch on the ol' unified belts.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.jBacca wrote:Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.BoxBuzz wrote:Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.jBacca wrote:Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?SAV wrote:sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.BoxBuzz wrote:Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.jBacca wrote:Buzz, if Tunney loses against Moore, he wants Possumbloom or Foster. Do not run.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
logic would dictate that its a 1 in 20 shot of getting it rightBoxBuzz wrote:so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?SAV wrote:sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.BoxBuzz wrote: Tunney will not lose, and then he will be forced to deal with the #1 contender....and that is a simulated fact.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
So I'm due!SAV wrote:logic would dictate that its a 1 in 20 shot of getting it rightBoxBuzz wrote:so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?SAV wrote: sorry jbacca, but buzz is like 1 for 20 when picking against sav this season.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
No. considering that 1 shot was only a few fights ago when maxi-pad paid off the judges and took the title from fox by 1 point.BoxBuzz wrote:So I'm due!SAV wrote:logic would dictate that its a 1 in 20 shot of getting it rightBoxBuzz wrote: so logic would dictate I'm due for that second time....right?
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
a miss is as good as a mile. You have to admit, Max's software is unique.....he's like the energizer bunny who can't hurt you, can't be hurt and is just happy as hell to be in a fight. He really hasn't been in a blow out either way. He's like a damn mirror SAV.....and it appears that many don't like what they see in that mirror.
Present company excluded of course.
He fights Eric Crumble to a close UD and TJF the same. He's one of a kind that Max!
Present company excluded of course.
He fights Eric Crumble to a close UD and TJF the same. He's one of a kind that Max!
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
If I could compare Boxbuzz to anyone, I would compare him to Jim in American Pie...
Like the character, he is all talk but no action.
Like the character, he is all talk but no action.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Championship after Championship after Championship....is pure, 100% effective and highly potent "action" son.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
Round our ways, we'd refer to you as a "shit 'ouse"
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
kevo wrote:Round our ways, we'd refer to you as a "shit 'ouse"
nah, I'm just the guy who doesn't want to face my own #1 draft pick in the last reel of the film.
Re: BoxBuzz and his no good underhanded methods.
I agreeMarlin wrote:I vote Buzz as the best manager in the Sim, the very fabric of SimSociety would crumble without him.