I say Barker is quite clearly better.
What say you?
(I'm going to regret this, aren't I?)
Small print - this poll is meaningless and merely an indication of posters' views. It has no bearing on reality. Or nationality.
X2Lenny wrote:Richard "the secret" Williams
Poncey wrote:X2Lenny wrote:Richard "the secret" Williams
Deno1986 wrote:
Sh1t-stirrer McNeilly
Dont be taking things personal Ian - its 'almost' all in jest for God's sake! ;)Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Deno1986 wrote:
Sh1t-stirrer McNeillyI'm just trying to be more subtle than resorting to straight up personal insults!
![]()
I must have missed Duddy's impressive performances.
If Barker is an A- then Duddy is a C+ at best.....he fights with his face and is more limited than the EnglishmanIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:slapbangwhallop says that John Duddy 'is no worse than Barker'.
I say Barker is quite clearly better.
What say you?
(I'm going to regret this, aren't I?)
Small print - this poll is meaningless and merely an indication of posters' views. It has no bearing on reality. Or nationality.
Barker by a golden showerMrBoxingUK2 wrote:barker by a golden mile
Duddy's ability aside - but if you think that Barker is an A- level operator on the world scene then my opinion of you opinion has taken a dip. A- operators don't have their arses battered by the likes of C level fighter like Belgacham.Captain Hook wrote:If Barker is an A- then Duddy is a C+ at best.....he fights with his face and is more limited than the EnglishmanIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:slapbangwhallop says that John Duddy 'is no worse than Barker'.
I say Barker is quite clearly better.
What say you?
(I'm going to regret this, aren't I?)
Small print - this poll is meaningless and merely an indication of posters' views. It has no bearing on reality. Or nationality.
No, I was talking about the comparison between the two Slap.slapbangwhallop wrote:Duddy's ability aside - but if you think that Barker is an A- level operator on the world scene then my opinion of you opinion has taken a dip. A- operators don't have their arses battered by the likes of C level fighter like Belgacham.Captain Hook wrote:If Barker is an A- then Duddy is a C+ at best.....he fights with his face and is more limited than the EnglishmanIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:slapbangwhallop says that John Duddy 'is no worse than Barker'.
I say Barker is quite clearly better.
What say you?
(I'm going to regret this, aren't I?)
Small print - this poll is meaningless and merely an indication of posters' views. It has no bearing on reality. Or nationality.
you forgot to carry the 1 Tel - this means the calculation is inverted! ;)Godfather of Dole wrote:Barker is a double AA/BB on the London scene, ya know. Duddy is A - 2 in certain parts of Ireland but is a staggering B + FY (x4) in Scotland, which means they are not too keen on him. In other words, the Scots are double DD'd on Duddy.Captain Hook wrote:No, I was talking about the comparison between the two Slap.slapbangwhallop wrote: Duddy's ability aside - but if you think that Barker is an A- level operator on the world scene then my opinion of you opinion has taken a dip. A- operators don't have their arses battered by the likes of C level fighter like Belgacham.
On the world scene, I'd say Barker is a B and I'll be kind and say Duddy is a C....
I'm an N........
I had you down as wan a dem alright!Godfather of Dole wrote:So are my nipples.slapbangwhallop wrote:you forgot to carry the 1 Tel - this means the calculation is inverted! ;)Godfather of Dole wrote: Barker is a double AA/BB on the London scene, ya know. Duddy is A - 2 in certain parts of Ireland but is a staggering B + FY (x4) in Scotland, which means they are not too keen on him. In other words, the Scots are double DD'd on Duddy.
That's my view, Hurlock.hurlock wrote:barker boxes rings round him,completely standing him on his head.