1991 Larry Holmes vs

Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Raff The Frenchman wrote:Judging by the thread, Mugabi hasn't been the one trolling. On the other hand, I do see the same people who once again, have found a way to turn a real boxing discussion with mature people respecting each other into a childish competition for who has the best grammar...If you wanted to discuss Mugabi's point and didn't agree with him you could have just put it into sentences without insulting him, using irony or arguing about his grammar. Indeed as long as you will keep doing that people will probably keep calling you "forum pudendum" and other sweet words, but since you don't really care...
Why would Saad & myself, among others, care when it comes from such Boxing illiterates such as yourself? Men whose demonstrable knowledge of the sport they observe without learning anything from is on oblivious display for all & sundry on Current Scene? LOL.

Mugabi --- I don't run my own business, or own an Imperial College degree, so help a peon like myself out --- What's a spelling bea?
Raff The Frenchman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 497
Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Raff The Frenchman »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Raff The Frenchman wrote:Judging by the thread, Mugabi hasn't been the one trolling. On the other hand, I do see the same people who once again, have found a way to turn a real boxing discussion with mature people respecting each other into a childish competition for who has the best grammar...If you wanted to discuss Mugabi's point and didn't agree with him you could have just put it into sentences without insulting him, using irony or arguing about his grammar. Indeed as long as you will keep doing that people will probably keep calling you "forum pudendum" and other sweet words, but since you don't really care...
Why would Saad & myself, among others, care when it comes from such Boxing illiterates such as yourself? Men whose demonstrable knowledge of the sport they observe without learning anything from is on oblivious display for all & sundry on Current Scene? LOL.

Mugabi --- I don't run my own business, or own an Imperial College degree, so help a peon like myself out --- What's a spelling bea?
Once again, rather than discussing, you rely on insults to step away from a simple question while it wasn't even about me.
By trying so hard to look like you are so smart you actually lose all credibility.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:Saddodick your jealousy and obsession with me is really getting out of hand!! Do get some proffesional help!

Nobody was talking to you little buddy. I think you should become a professional speller. But i'm sure that was another typo. :lol:

Amazing that you have no interest other than bickering on the internet. Some of us are trying to talk about the tremendous stamina of Tommy Morrison. You need to relax keyboard warrior. If you spent half as much time watching fights as you do starting them on the internet you might actually learn something about the sport. But trolling like yours is better served in ignorant bliss.
Listen to the illiterate little troll king in his online warrior realm. :D Its all about spelling with you isn't it? I bet you live in some crappy little urine stained project/bedsit sitting on the internet all day constantly having to use spellcheck so no one catches you out on your nit picking. You probably havent moved on from primary school level which is why spelling is so important to you.I'm an Imperial College grad running his own business FYI, but guess what saddo?, some of us are so busy, even us college grads, that we type on the subway, in the car,on our mobile phones, on these boxing forums in bliss that it isn't a spelling bea for 7 year olds, and some troll wont pull us up on it! .I notice you also troll other members and fight all the time with those with a opinion different to yours. Others like dempsey and robinson have an opinion different to mine yet we diont resort to your childish bickering. :shame:
Here is a new spelling for you, change your name to saddodick its far more appropriate given your trollish opinions and lack off boxing knowledge! :DDD
Another childish novel composed from your car? You seriously expect anyone to believe you write this garbage while you drive? That's fantastic that you own your own business Mugabi. That doesn't change the fact that you're a comp[lete moron that is desperately stalking a man on the internet. The fact that you feel the need to boast of your career is more of the same from you. Reading between the lines you probably clean urine soaked buildings and post on the internet in the library while you beat off to kiddie porn.

If you want me to teach you the basics about Boxing and it's history, just ask me. Your trolling attention in every thread I post in is certainly unnecessary and it isn't fair to the rest of the board to have to read your unprovoked attacks day after day.

It's amazing that someone with such a rich life spends each and every day composing this kind of filth. Hopefully your kids never get a hold of your use of the "queens language". Funny I have British friends that distinguish between you're and your just fine.

Lets be real about it, you keep posting with cock in your mouth. No reason to get so upset that I disagree with your outlandish and incorrect views on Boxing. I realize that you're not obsessed with Robinson or Dempsey. You definitely don't start 3 year old battles with them like you do with me. At least you recognize your problem. Now try and put down the dick, get a 2nd grade spelling book and some Boxing DvD's. Work real hard at it and maybe someday you can become more than a useless troll on this board.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Raff The Frenchman wrote:Judging by the thread, Mugabi hasn't been the one trolling. On the other hand, I do see the same people who once again, have found a way to turn a real boxing discussion with mature people respecting each other into a childish competition for who has the best grammar...If you wanted to discuss Mugabi's point and didn't agree with him you could have just put it into sentences without insulting him, using irony or arguing about his grammar. Indeed as long as you will keep doing that people will probably keep calling you "forum pudendum" and other sweet words, but since you don't really care...

And we hear from Mugabi's boyfriend. I disagreed with him, he insulted me. It's the same pattern. Perhaps he is just too stupid to understand the difference.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Bricks »

What a suyprise the trolling husband and wife Saddo and Ureenie jump in again to troll the moment there was a fight be had with a new poster. yes I did type the last message from my car and I'm doing this one too. You see unlike you two dysfunctional degenerates I can use my brain to do more than one thing at once.

What is your actual purpose in life of you two trolls? You must have a very very unfortunate life to be so bitter and ignorant and incapable of civilised debate. This is a forum board you will find people who disagree with your view , is that a reason for you to troll them day and night and every thread they post on nitpicking things like spelling?

I do wonder about both of your obsessions with spelling and wonder if you are the same accunt. (yes that was a deliberate spelling mistake for you two to get all excited about!) :lol: :lol:

Raff thanks for the support but like you I agree one cannot get in a pissing contest with illiterate trolls like saado and ureenie. Its up to the more responsible members like us to ignore them as all trolls like them feed off attention
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

mugabi wrote:What a suyprise the trolling husband and wife Saddo and Ureenie jump in again to troll the moment there was a fight be had with a new poster. yes I did type the last message from my car and I'm doing this one too. You see unlike you two dysfunctional degenerates I can use my brain to do more than one thing at once.

What is your actual purpose in life of you two trolls? You must have a very very unfortunate life to be so bitter and ignorant and incapable of civilised debate. This is a forum board you will find people who disagree with your view , is that a reason for you to troll them day and night and every thread they post on nitpicking things like spelling?

I do wonder about both of your obsessions with spelling and wonder if you are the same accunt. (yes that was a deliberate spelling mistake for you two to get all excited about!) :lol: :lol:

Raff thanks for the support but like you I agree one cannot get in a pissing contest with illiterate trolls like saado and ureenie. Its up to the more responsible members like us to ignore them as all trolls like them feed off attention
You can't even come up with your own insults. I've never said a word about spelling to anyone other than you and that wouldn't happen if you didn't constantly feel free to call me an idiot when you can't even compose a literate sentence. I don't use spell check at all and make plenty of errors on my own. You're just too stupid to notice them.

You have no brain Mugabi, you're nothing more than a window licking retard. You're right, it is a board and it would be boring if everyone agreed. You should take your own words to heart and not weep and cry for 5 pages everytime I make a post.

You weren't insulted, I laughed at your assessment of Morrison/Holmes along with everybody else. You just went on another of your 2 year old tirades. Try and grow up just a little bit, if you can learn to conduct yourself on even a 10 year old level you might be able to fit in with the rest of us adults.

By all means, put me on ignore. I'd love to go a day without one of your mush mouthed assaults.
Raff The Frenchman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 497
Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Raff The Frenchman »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Raff The Frenchman wrote:Judging by the thread, Mugabi hasn't been the one trolling. On the other hand, I do see the same people who once again, have found a way to turn a real boxing discussion with mature people respecting each other into a childish competition for who has the best grammar...If you wanted to discuss Mugabi's point and didn't agree with him you could have just put it into sentences without insulting him, using irony or arguing about his grammar. Indeed as long as you will keep doing that people will probably keep calling you "forum pudendum" and other sweet words, but since you don't really care...

And we hear from Mugabi's boyfriend. I disagreed with him, he insulted me. It's the same pattern. Perhaps he is just too stupid to understand the difference.
Where did he insult you? I am looking at the thread and saw no insults, you were the one who started taunting him, the discussion was doing good until that. And calling me "his boyfriend" doesn't really help you look like he's the one insulting people...
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Bricks »

I think the only joke here is you Saad. You and Irene fight with everyone when your not fighting yourselves! You two have bought this board into disrepute and should sod off to a WWE forum where you can troll to your hearts content. You know i wish i had so much knowledge and time on my hands as you so that I could one day educate myself to think George Foreman was a poor infighter!

You also seem to be delusionary thinking your view is everyones view. The reality is you are a laughing stock

:lol:

Dempsey and Robinson disagreed with my view on Morrison but we had an intelligent debate and didnt insult each other. It was you who jumped in to troll! And im glad others are seeing it too!
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

mugabi wrote:What a suyprise the trolling husband and wife Saddo and Ureenie jump in again to troll the moment there was a fight be had with a new poster. yes I did type the last message from my car and I'm doing this one too. You see unlike you two dysfunctional degenerates I can use my brain to do more than one thing at once.

What is your actual purpose in life of you two trolls? You must have a very very unfortunate life to be so bitter and ignorant and incapable of civilised debate. This is a forum board you will find people who disagree with your view , is that a reason for you to troll them day and night and every thread they post on nitpicking things like spelling?

I do wonder about both of your obsessions with spelling and wonder if you are the same accunt. (yes that was a deliberate spelling mistake for you two to get all excited about!) :lol: :lol:

Raff thanks for the support but like you I agree one cannot get in a pissing contest with illiterate trolls like saado and ureenie. Its up to the more responsible members like us to ignore them as all trolls like them feed off attention
LOL! You utter, utter imbecile. You are --- remarkably --- so dense you not only lie, but compose a lie so completely incredible only you cannot see why no one is fooled. In your eyes, it is apparently plausible to have written the above while you're out & about cruising the neighbourhood. I hope you don't drive anything too expensive, because I can imagine the damage as you focus all your energies on, "one-upping" the evil Saad, careening through postboxes, pedestrians & parking meters, your eyes all the while glued to the text.

Is it an empty feeling to pull into the driveway, vehicle battered, hubcap rolling off onto the lawn, & knowing for all that, you still were embarrassed for being both linguistically & pugilistically illiterate? Let me tell you, in no uncertain terms, when a Boxing lightweight like Raffy comes to your defense, well...
gambler49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 405
Joined: 07 Mar 2009, 02:54

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by gambler49 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Raff The Frenchman wrote:Judging by the thread, Mugabi hasn't been the one trolling. On the other hand, I do see the same people who once again, have found a way to turn a real boxing discussion with mature people respecting each other into a childish competition for who has the best grammar...If you wanted to discuss Mugabi's point and didn't agree with him you could have just put it into sentences without insulting him, using irony or arguing about his grammar. Indeed as long as you will keep doing that people will probably keep calling you "forum pudendum" and other sweet words, but since you don't really care...

And we hear from Mugabi's boyfriend. I disagreed with him, he insulted me. It's the same pattern. Perhaps he is just too stupid to understand the difference.

This is not about Holmes! This is over the edge!
Wat next? Are u going to insult his religion? His Race?
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

mugabi wrote:I think the only joke here is you Saad. You and Irene fight with everyone when your not fighting yourselves! You two have bought this board into disrepute and should sod off to a WWE forum where you can troll to your hearts content. You know i wish i had so much knowledge and time on my hands as you so that I could one day educate myself to think George Foreman was a poor infighter!

You also seem to be delusionary thinking your view is everyones view. The reality is you are a laughing stock

:lol:

Dempsey and Robinson disagreed with my view on Morrison but we had an intelligent debate and didnt insult each other. It was you who jumped in to troll! And im glad others are seeing it too!
Write it fifty times --- " The Queen's English makes a distinction between, 'your' &, 'you're.' "
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

mugabi wrote:I think the only joke here is you Saad. You and Irene fight with everyone when your not fighting yourselves! You two have bought this board into disrepute and should sod off to a WWE forum where you can troll to your hearts content. You know i wish i had so much knowledge and time on my hands as you so that I could one day educate myself to think George Foreman was a poor infighter!

You also seem to be delusionary thinking your view is everyones view. The reality is you are a laughing stock

:lol:

I certainly wont sit around and let you insult me without responding. But you've started every argument we have ever had. Much like you started this one.Again, with such off the wall opinions you have to learn to accept opposing views. It's crucial for you if you're every going to grow up and be a big boy capable of carrying on big boy conversations.

And we can add ignoring to your already lengthy list of internet failures. As great as your success in life is, you fail miserably at posting on the internet. You just can't get along with others. Luckily for you, that doesn't interfere with your high rolling business life outside of here.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Raff The Frenchman wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Raff The Frenchman wrote:Judging by the thread, Mugabi hasn't been the one trolling. On the other hand, I do see the same people who once again, have found a way to turn a real boxing discussion with mature people respecting each other into a childish competition for who has the best grammar...If you wanted to discuss Mugabi's point and didn't agree with him you could have just put it into sentences without insulting him, using irony or arguing about his grammar. Indeed as long as you will keep doing that people will probably keep calling you "forum pudendum" and other sweet words, but since you don't really care...
Why would Saad & myself, among others, care when it comes from such Boxing illiterates such as yourself? Men whose demonstrable knowledge of the sport they observe without learning anything from is on oblivious display for all & sundry on Current Scene? LOL.

Mugabi --- I don't run my own business, or own an Imperial College degree, so help a peon like myself out --- What's a spelling bea?
Once again, rather than discussing, you rely on insults to step away from a simple question while it wasn't even about me.
By trying so hard to look like you are so smart you actually lose all credibility.
All credibility with who!? With you? I've seen your knowledge at work. You're frankly beneath me --- no hyperbole or bluster involved. You are classic Current Scene fodder. The embodiment of what everyone jokes about regarding CS. Go back to genuflecting at the Klitschko shrine.
boswell perkins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 06:45

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by boswell perkins »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:I think the only joke here is you Saad. You and Irene fight with everyone when your not fighting yourselves! You two have bought this board into disrepute and should sod off to a WWE forum where you can troll to your hearts content. You know i wish i had so much knowledge and time on my hands as you so that I could one day educate myself to think George Foreman was a poor infighter!

You also seem to be delusionary thinking your view is everyones view. The reality is you are a laughing stock

:lol:

I certainly wont sit around and let you insult me without responding. But you've started every argument we have ever had. Much like you started this one.Again, with such off the wall opinions you have to learn to accept opposing views. It's crucial for you if you're every going to grow up and be a big boy capable of carrying on big boy conversations.

And we can add ignoring to your already lengthy list of internet failures. As great as your success in life is, you fail miserably at posting on the internet. You just can't get along with others. Luckily for you, that doesn't interfere with your high rolling business life outside of here.
Dude I was gna post ere but judgin by your rude posts i will problly get slaughtered by you you seriously need to take a chill pill and stop bitching wit everyone
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

boswell perkins wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
mugabi wrote:I think the only joke here is you Saad. You and Irene fight with everyone when your not fighting yourselves! You two have bought this board into disrepute and should sod off to a WWE forum where you can troll to your hearts content. You know i wish i had so much knowledge and time on my hands as you so that I could one day educate myself to think George Foreman was a poor infighter!

You also seem to be delusionary thinking your view is everyones view. The reality is you are a laughing stock

:lol:

I certainly wont sit around and let you insult me without responding. But you've started every argument we have ever had. Much like you started this one.Again, with such off the wall opinions you have to learn to accept opposing views. It's crucial for you if you're every going to grow up and be a big boy capable of carrying on big boy conversations.

And we can add ignoring to your already lengthy list of internet failures. As great as your success in life is, you fail miserably at posting on the internet. You just can't get along with others. Luckily for you, that doesn't interfere with your high rolling business life outside of here.
Dude I was gna post ere but judgin by your rude posts i will problly get slaughtered by you you seriously need to take a chill pill and stop bitching wit everyone

LOL
boswell perkins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 06:45

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by boswell perkins »

I was talkin about you :TU: every forum has some1 like you
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Like the idiot spy with the newspaper in front of him, Mugabi poses as a newcomer, now.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

boswell perkins wrote:I was talkin about you :TU: every forum has some1 like you

I understood you quite well. It was very funny.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

boswell perkins wrote:I was talkin about you :TU: every forum has some1 like you
Haven't you heard? According to the other voice in your head, there are two of us on this board.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Like the idiot spy with the newspaper in front of him, Mugabi poses as a newcomer, now.

Looks like he is frantically pming around the board looking for people to back up his psychotic posting. The elite have arrived, spelling books in hand.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

At least Skelp had the decency to just PM a bunch of us asking us to kill ourselves.
boswell perkins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 06:45

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by boswell perkins »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Like the idiot spy with the newspaper in front of him, Mugabi poses as a newcomer, now.

Looks like he is frantically pming around the board looking for people to back up his psychotic posting. The elite have arrived, spelling books in hand.
you got a serious attitude problem dude? so u wna fight with me 2 now :roll:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:At least Skelp had the decency to just PM a bunch of us asking us to kill ourselves.

I was omitted from that club. But Mugabi's high octane trolling is making up for it.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

"LOL, I didn't feel like hurting Mugabi's feelings and spending 4 days in a childish internet argument. But Morrison destroying Holmes may be the worst prediction I have ever read."

How prophetic this turned out to be.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: 1991 Larry Holmes vs

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

boswell perkins wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Like the idiot spy with the newspaper in front of him, Mugabi poses as a newcomer, now.

Looks like he is frantically pming around the board looking for people to back up his psychotic posting. The elite have arrived, spelling books in hand.
you got a serious attitude problem dude? so u wna fight with me 2 now :roll:

You will have to work on your insults. These aren't even enough to draw me in.
Locked