Off topic: Goz's website

Post Reply
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Off topic: Goz's website

Post by jomothepure »

Whilst we all seem to be digressing a bit from...em...that we're meant to talk about...people put red things on their hands...anyway

Well, anyone not satisfied by either Council Tax or Grand National discussions, feast your eyes on Goz's website, which I discovered at the bottom of his posts. (There's a pun in there somewhere.)

http://www.gosnold.co.uk/

I commend you Goz. Best times everyone? Have to say I've only spent a couple of minutes on it (honest) but I only last to about 12 secs when it seems to get faster.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

17.015 seconds.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

14 so far, but I will get that into the 20 second barrier.

The site has changed a little bit since I last looked at it.
Smit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 451
Joined: 02 Jul 2004, 07:31

Post by Smit »

26.64 seconds.

played that game before, last year sometime..
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I've got to 18, but I give up now - no chance of beating that.

I used to think the Sky Sports Cricket world cup was addictive, this little game kicks its arse.
dandantheweatherman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 337
Joined: 23 Apr 2004, 20:10

Post by dandantheweatherman »

15 seconds. I'm supposed to making the Shipping Forecast for Radio 4, but that'll have to wait until I've done 30 secs...
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

dandantheweatherman wrote:15 seconds. I'm supposed to making the Shipping Forecast for Radio 4, but that'll have to wait until I've done 30 secs...
:lol: :lol: :lol:

And tonights shipping forcast.

Damn those b*stard blue *fupping* blocks.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

You'll never do 30 no way.
mickeybeard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 488
Joined: 31 Jan 2004, 09:05

Post by mickeybeard »

31.105
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

20.9 so far, there's a point at around 18 when they all group in the top left, if you can swerve round them at that point you have a chance at lasting another...umm 2 seconds

Holy moly 31??
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

21.976 after an hours work lol, quality addictive game :TU:
lamphey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 317
Joined: 04 Jan 2002, 20:00

Post by lamphey »

Crikey, took me about 20 go's to work out what to do with a best of about 0.5 secs.

Got up to 33.45 secs now but it's getting too late.

Going to have some fun with this tomorrow. :TU:
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

Funny seeing this thread upon logging on this morning! I wondered if it had been hacked and someone had chucked a load of porn on the site!! Shame :(

I think I did 40 odd seconds before, anyone know anything about programming websites and getting them to record high scores on the site? That would be pretty good but I don't have clue how to do it....
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Post by dondada »

23.133 after 5 minutes. Not bad.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Post by Wales »

the slower your pc the easier it is to get a higher score, i would do 24 odd in work but at a mates house with slower pc we were breaking the 34 second barrier fairly consistently.
lirva33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by lirva33 »

47.318
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Post by dondada »

lirva33 wrote:47.318
Now that is a long wank.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
lirva33 wrote:47.318
Now that is a long wank.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

stujones wrote:I've got to 18, but I give up now - no chance of beating that.

I used to think the Sky Sports Cricket world cup was addictive, this little game kicks its arse.
Brian Lara's cricket, ahh those were the days. LMA manager....cracking.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

16.57 after about 2 minutes, but I'm on a Pentium 4 top of the range PC with 1 gig of Ram. It was like greased lightning already...
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
stujones wrote:I've got to 18, but I give up now - no chance of beating that.

I used to think the Sky Sports Cricket world cup was addictive, this little game kicks its arse.
Brian Lara's cricket, ahh those were the days. LMA manager....cracking.
Nah it wasn't BL's cricket - it was a game Sky were doing for the 2003 Cricket world cup. You only batted and it was aninals such as the opening batsman as a lion called "Steve Roar". I still have the game on my e-mail system, and still go on it occasionally.
jeej
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 936
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 15:18

Post by jeej »

I knew it was gonna be that game!

My best is about 39 seconds.
Post Reply