Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post Reply
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by Jeff Thomas »

For me;

John Murray,
Frankie Gavin,
Kenny Anderson,
Carl Frampton,
Tyson Fury,
David Price
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by 15829 »

paul smith
stephen smith
tony bellew
kevin mitchell
darren barker
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5456
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by forcefraser »

Carl Froch
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by slapbangwhallop »

MachoMan09 wrote:Floyd Mayweather
James Toney
Bernard Hopkins
Manny Pacquiao
Outside of Irish guys I would go for watchin these guys but also add Martinez as well
Fatsam
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 11:14

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by Fatsam »

miguel cotto
manny pacquiao
carl froch
doctorboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by doctorboxing »

David Haye
Danny Williams
Carl Froch
Mathew Macklin
Darren Barker
Kell Brook
Floyd Mayweather
Pacman
Kevin Mitchell
Yuri Gamboa
idle talk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 246
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 11:56

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by idle talk »

mayweather
pacman
haye
both marquezs
khan
brook
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by lefthook82 »

1. Khan. By some considerable distance I must say

2. Mayweather

3. Pacman
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

David Haye - car crash TV - he is either knocking the guy out or coming apart himself - I know he has actually only lost once as a pro but you always get the feeling he is vunerable himself.

Enzo Macc - same reasons as David Haye.

Froch - fight with Kelseer was thrilling stuff.

Pacman = awesome fighting machine.

Mayweather - only too see if anyone can challenge his dominace - boring fighter really though - just winning all them unamonous decsions with his safety first skills.

Khan - to a lesser degree to the others though.
HomeOfBritishBoxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by HomeOfBritishBoxing »

carl froch
kell brook
frankie gavin
nathan cleverly
jason booth
darren barker
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6440
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by Deserter »

Livingstone Cole wrote:
forcefraser wrote:Carl Froch
Why did that take three posts?
Froch, for all his technical flaws, is still the most exciting fighter on these shores.
So glad you wrote that as when I started scrolling down my jaw was dropping at the same rate. How can anyone not have Froch in there given his record to date and what's to come with King Arthur?
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

"Iron" Mike Tyson was the ultimate "must see" when I was younger watching boxing in the 1990's.

And I am sure most people would agree.

His release from prison - the farce against Mcneely and Seldon and Bruno and the dramtic Holyfield losses and the tremodous hype and anmosity in the Lennox Lewis build up =

But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6440
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by Deserter »

FLINT ISLAND wrote: But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.
Sorry, but couldn't disagree more. Having watched him in his heyday I couldn't bear watching the shell of the man in 'action'.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23117
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by mickey1975 »

Deserter wrote:
FLINT ISLAND wrote: But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.
Sorry, but couldn't disagree more. Having watched him in his heyday I couldn't bear watching the shell of the man in 'action'.
Yep,i got up for Berbick,Smith,Thomas,Tucker,etc,but didnt even bother buying Ettiene.The interest Iron Mike created in the mid 80's was something else.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by whiskey »

Cotto
Froch
Haye

Domestically

Jason Booth
Frankie Gavin
Tyson Fury
Rendall Munroe

To a lesser extent (will watch next morning)

Kessler
Khan
Katsidis
Guzman
Pacquiao
Pavlik
Williams
DougieC30
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 586
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 15:00

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by DougieC30 »

Micheal Katsidis :box:
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

DougieC30 wrote:Micheal Katsidis :box:
This so much!
Haye
Froch
Pacquiao
Wlad (like him or hate him he can be taken...and can take out anyone)
Benavidez (mainly because I want to find out if it's all hype)
Ji Hoon Kim
Wonjongkam (mainly because he's a legend, not his stye)
Gamboa
JuanMa
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by fasteddie »

FLINT ISLAND wrote:"Iron" Mike Tyson was the ultimate "must see" when I was younger watching boxing in the 1990's.

And I am sure most people would agree.

His release from prison - the farce against Mcneely and Seldon and Bruno and the dramtic Holyfield losses and the tremodous hype and anmosity in the Lennox Lewis build up =

But even against the likes of Frans Botha and CLifford Ettiene you couldnt miss a Tyson fight.

totally agree with you here,mike tyson was the best attraction for 20 years in boxing loved waiting for his fights
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Which fighters do you consider absoute must see viewing?

Post by fasteddie »

mayweather
pacman
mosley
haye
froch
marquez
ryan rhodes
anyone who puts hopkins must love falling asleep while he is fighting,he is the most boring fighter of our generation
Post Reply