The 100% Genuine Bonafide FW Lineal Championship Thread

Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: REMARKABLE PRESTIGIOUS GBP ben K & SIM RING MAGAZINE HISTORY

Post by Crease »

BoxBuzz wrote:Hmm what week was the draw vs Vasquez?
Let me help you out there old 'Buzz... Never let it be said that I'm not a helpful guy.

Week 11: Rafael Marquez W KO5 vs Azumah Nelson
Week 12: Vicente Saldivar W TKO6 vs Rafael Marquez
Week 13: Vicente Saldivar W UD vs Nel Tarleton
Week 14: Vicente Saldivar W TKO4 vs Chalky Wright
Week 15: Vicente Saldivar D vs Israel Vasquez
Week 16: Vicente Saldivar W TKO8 vs Ruben Olivares

And there you are...

PS. And to be honest, this title needs a new name...
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: REMARKABLE PRESTIGIOUS GBP ben K & SIM RING MAGAZINE HISTORY

Post by BoxBuzz »

"be dicks about it"?....."bellyaching"? This sounds disrespectful and falls out side of acceptable negotiating terminology. We must put you on notice that This sort of "mining for conflict" can bring bad consequences.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: REMARKABLE PRESTIGIOUS GBP ben K & SIM RING MAGAZINE HISTORY

Post by BoxBuzz »

Crease wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Hmm what week was the draw vs Vasquez?
Let me help you out there old 'Buzz... Never let it be said that I'm not a helpful guy.

Week 11: Rafael Marquez W KO5 vs Azumah Nelson
Week 12: Vicente Saldivar W TKO6 vs Rafael Marquez
Week 13: Vicente Saldivar W UD vs Nel Tarleton
Week 14: Vicente Saldivar W TKO4 vs Chalky Wright
Week 15: Vicente Saldivar D vs Israel Vasquez
Week 16: Vicente Saldivar W TKO8 vs Ruben Olivares

And there you are...

PS. And to be honest, this title needs a new name...
Thanks Crease the record will rightly reflect your update.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: REMARKABLE PRESTIGIOUS GBP ben K & SIM RING MAGAZINE HISTORY

Post by Crease »

BoxBuzz wrote:Thanks Crease the record will rightly reflect your update.
:TU:
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: REMARKABLE PRESTIGIOUS GBP ben K & SIM RING MAGAZINE HISTORY

Post by BoxBuzz »

DetroitHxC wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:"be dicks about it"? This sounds disrespectful and falls out side of acceptable negotiating terminology. We must put you on notice that This sort of "mining for conflict" can bring bad consequences.
I couldn't care less Buzz, I was just trying to give you some advice that you clearly needed.
Very well, you and fighter are deserving of the fate you will inherit.

You are now scheduled for destruction at the hands of Nelson as soon as you can find your way out of hiding within these silly tournaments. We would expect that to be somewhere around the 41st fight. But who knows, you may find your cajones and wander out of this wonderful hiding spot you've found. You are facing nothing but Riff Raff you know it I know it and apparently Crease knows it.
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: REMARKABLE PRESTIGIOUS GBP ben K & SIM RING MAGAZINE HISTORY

Post by Sweet P »

BoxBuzz wrote:That's an option...however what I hear from the champion's manager appears reasonable. He seems a man of honor. We would agree if ben k agrees. And of course the Sim Ring board can always overule us.

So far this is the belt that can claim lineal actuality. No other ABC title can lay claim to same.
I agree, He seems a man of his word.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: The 100% Genuine Bonafide FW Lineal Championship Thread

Post by BoxBuzz »

True and genuine lineal status updated.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: The 100% Genuine Bonafide FW Lineal Championship Thread

Post by BoxBuzz »

A sad week in lineal history. Pep the lineal champ refuses to unify titles. However he remains "the man who beat the man" but now he takes on the more dubious honor of "the man who is running from the man."

Title History Updated.
Post Reply