Dan Cadman the other night

Post Reply
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Thought he was class personally, shame he's not been on TV more. Good fighter real talent.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by THEBUTCH »

I expected quite a bit more from Cadman as a pro after being a quality amateur. It all seems to be there, but there's just something missing come fight night. I wonder sometimes if he ever truly got over the humbling at the hands of Matthew Thirlwall during the London ABA finals all those years ago.

Top bloke though and good to watch.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by DavidPayne »

THEBUTCH wrote:I expected quite a bit more from Cadman as a pro after being a quality amateur. It all seems to be there, but there's just something missing come fight night. I wonder sometimes if he ever truly got over the humbling at the hands of Matthew Thirlwall during the London ABA finals all those years ago.

Top bloke though and good to watch.
Which is interesting as Thirlwall has done nowt, apart from get the worst tatoo in boxing, as a pro too.
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Thirwell was a top am, blasted that Stephen Birch too- I thought Birch would do great things.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by THEBUTCH »

DavidPayne, Thirlwall hasn't won any titles, granted, but he's had few noteworthy wins...Osman, Hillyard, Smilley. Should have bagged an Area and English title at the least though.
Brit Ryan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 199
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 12:50

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Brit Ryan »

Daniel also went all out in the semi in the best tradition of Prizeighter and was v friendly to eveybody (other boxers and punters) on the night too
I would say he came out second best from the night.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by DavidPayne »

THEBUTCH wrote:DavidPayne, Thirlwall hasn't won any titles, granted, but he's had few noteworthy wins...Osman, Hillyard, Smilley. Should have bagged an Area and English title at the least though.
Butch - that is the frustration.

I would venture his level of ability is broadly where Paul Smith's is, though dedication should be listed as an ability too.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by THEBUTCH »

I think one of his biceps has been a big problem too, but yes, dedication to the sport probably isn't what it should be, and you're right, it's all part and parcel of being a good boxer...but when you can attract the ladies like he can, that would test a lot of guys desire to live a spartan lifestyle :wink:

You can just imagine him, if not winning a Lonsdale title, then at least taking part in one or two British title classic fights that get talked about for years. Shame.
cairney2u
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 14:31

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by cairney2u »

First time I had seen the lad (PrizeFighter ) I thought he won rounds 2& 3 :shame:
gasman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 740
Joined: 20 May 2009, 10:59

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by gasman »

Jeff Thomas wrote:Thought he was class personally, shame he's not been on TV more. Good fighter real talent.
I agree - he was great. He made Prizefighter the other night.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Quixall »

Prize fighter seems to be all about three rounds of brawling.............

In that respect Cadman was value for money.

Nice bloke, but as a fighter, forget it. To say he is a good fighter makes me wonder what or who you are comparing him to.
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Quixall wrote:Prize fighter seems to be all about three rounds of brawling.............

In that respect Cadman was value for money.

Nice bloke, but as a fighter, forget it. To say he is a good fighter makes me wonder what or who you are comparing him to.
He's a good fighter compared to not so good fighters, his balance was good and his shots were tidy. He was exciting and gave it a real go. He's got talent.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Quixall »

Jeff Thomas wrote:
Quixall wrote:Prize fighter seems to be all about three rounds of brawling.............

In that respect Cadman was value for money.

Nice bloke, but as a fighter, forget it. To say he is a good fighter makes me wonder what or who you are comparing him to.
He's a good fighter compared to not so good fighters, his balance was good and his shots were tidy. He was exciting and gave it a real go. He's got talent.
I know there were high hopes for him when he turned pro.........

He had a good amateur career, so it's a shame that his pro career never took off. Mainly to do with finances i pressume. Many boxers when they turn pro can't train full time, so they lack sparing, general sharpness, suffer a few defeats and their confidence is knocked......

It's a tough tough sport to break.

Dceent journeman is where i would put Cadman...............no more
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Quixall wrote:
Jeff Thomas wrote:
Quixall wrote:Prize fighter seems to be all about three rounds of brawling.............

In that respect Cadman was value for money.

Nice bloke, but as a fighter, forget it. To say he is a good fighter makes me wonder what or who you are comparing him to.
He's a good fighter compared to not so good fighters, his balance was good and his shots were tidy. He was exciting and gave it a real go. He's got talent.
I know there were high hopes for him when he turned pro.........

He had a good amateur career, so it's a shame that his pro career never took off. Mainly to do with finances i pressume. Many boxers when they turn pro can't train full time, so they lack sparing, general sharpness, suffer a few defeats and their confidence is knocked......

It's a tough tough sport to break.

Dceent journeman is where i would put Cadman...............no more
Talented kid is where i'd put him, not really had enough fights to be considered a journeyman for me mate. Think you over estimating my opinion of what is an isn't a good fighter. I just liked the way he boxed you'd think that he'd have done a great deal more based on his performances.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by hurlock »

people bang on about his am career, he was only succesfull as a junior...he's allways been strong :!: but as a kid his strength was unreal & he can bang with the left hook allways setting up with a lead right he seems to run out of patience & stamina, but jt's right he's got talent but not the right mindset.
when thirlwall dropped him he punched the canvas & went roaring in straight onto a right hander :DD
thirlwall & walker one of the worst two managed fighters imo
potnoodle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 130
Joined: 08 May 2009, 08:34

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by potnoodle »

Cadman=LEGEND!!!! :TU:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Dan Cadman the other night

Post by palooka »

cadman is tidy, strong and has loads of bottle. he got whacked bad in the 1st round and i nearly dropped my beer when he ran out and dished it out :bow: the 1st time i've seen him box and fair play to him; he's got a very decent style, has a good punch and takes a whack, he doesn't moan when it gets tough. in short he ought to be on the telly a bit more.
Post Reply