Fury vs Olubamiwo?
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Fury easy.
And there is definatly something in this 'Boxrec bounce' that fighters who post here get from the posters.
When its all said and done dude lost to Peret and shouldn't be taken seriously until he avneges that embarrasing loss
And there is definatly something in this 'Boxrec bounce' that fighters who post here get from the posters.
When its all said and done dude lost to Peret and shouldn't be taken seriously until he avneges that embarrasing loss
-
Jeff Thomas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Yep totally agree with this.MachoMan09 wrote:@Markp et al,
I don't think anybody has said Fury is a bad boxer. The gripe people have is that he will potentially underachieve because of his lousy work/training ethic. Why let your talent go to waste because you can't be arsed doing hard runs and proper conditioning?
Larry is the Polar opposite. He is not a purist's dream nor will he ever be. He clearly trains hard, though. I agree with an earlier poster that Larry could benefit from some muscular atrophy; providing it doesn't degrade his power too much. There are very few examples of guys of Larry's proportions being able to maintain an impressive output for 12 rounds. That said, his sheer strength and determination are impressive and fighters will be intimidated by him, no doubt.
I think a fight between the two would have to be short. If it went beyond four, you would have two men blowing for two different reasons: one because he was lazy and hadn't put the effort in; and the other because he is simply carrying too much muscle mass.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Clifford Etienne could maintain a strong output, couldn't knock the top off a rice pudding nor take one on the chin but he did work hard from bell to bell, if memory serves....him v Clay-Bey is a mini-classic.Jeff Thomas wrote:Yep totally agree with this.MachoMan09 wrote:@Markp et al,
I don't think anybody has said Fury is a bad boxer. The gripe people have is that he will potentially underachieve because of his lousy work/training ethic. Why let your talent go to waste because you can't be arsed doing hard runs and proper conditioning?
Larry is the Polar opposite. He is not a purist's dream nor will he ever be. He clearly trains hard, though. I agree with an earlier poster that Larry could benefit from some muscular atrophy; providing it doesn't degrade his power too much. There are very few examples of guys of Larry's proportions being able to maintain an impressive output for 12 rounds. That said, his sheer strength and determination are impressive and fighters will be intimidated by him, no doubt.
I think a fight between the two would have to be short. If it went beyond four, you would have two men blowing for two different reasons: one because he was lazy and hadn't put the effort in; and the other because he is simply carrying too much muscle mass.
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Disagree. Fury has shown nothing overly special any time he fought someone that isn't bottom of the barrel level. I think Larry would have done a better job against McD then Fury managed and if Fury gasses like he did in the McD fight Larry will put him away in a few punches.markp wrote:this is what i mean about overrating fighters who post on the forums.
larry has no chance against fury. he is not on furys level (which is a low one).
This fight is fair to be made, Larry the Southern Area Champ and Fury English, it's how it should be.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Larry by KO in the first four rounds...
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Two cart horses giving us a fun race.
Fury late ko.
PS Fury thinks he beats Haye
Fury late ko.
PS Fury thinks he beats Haye
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
going well 75 votes 8)
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
cant believe its so close
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
it really is shocking. I mean, you don't have to be a really knowledgeable boxing fan to be able to look at the two fighters objectively and analyze how a fight between them would go. It's really obvious.diggler wrote:cant believe its so close
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
i enjoyed that fight too david, cley bay was very talented but as lazy as f**KDavidPayne wrote:Clifford Etienne could maintain a strong output, couldn't knock the top off a rice pudding nor take one on the chin but he did work hard from bell to bell, if memory serves....him v Clay-Bey is a mini-classic.Jeff Thomas wrote:Yep totally agree with this.MachoMan09 wrote:@Markp et al,
I don't think anybody has said Fury is a bad boxer. The gripe people have is that he will potentially underachieve because of his lousy work/training ethic. Why let your talent go to waste because you can't be arsed doing hard runs and proper conditioning?
Larry is the Polar opposite. He is not a purist's dream nor will he ever be. He clearly trains hard, though. I agree with an earlier poster that Larry could benefit from some muscular atrophy; providing it doesn't degrade his power too much. There are very few examples of guys of Larry's proportions being able to maintain an impressive output for 12 rounds. That said, his sheer strength and determination are impressive and fighters will be intimidated by him, no doubt.
I think a fight between the two would have to be short. If it went beyond four, you would have two men blowing for two different reasons: one because he was lazy and hadn't put the effort in; and the other because he is simply carrying too much muscle mass.
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Fury because he has proved he can go the distance and has proved he can stop people in the later rounds.
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
An out of shape Mcdermott Fury was hanging on he was so out of shape too. I don't rate Fury at all!brian13 wrote:Fury because he has proved he can go the distance and has proved he can stop people in the later rounds.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
You might enjoy this, which includes an Amat vid of Clay-Bey fighting Klitschko.rhino222 wrote:i enjoyed that fight too david, cley bay was very talented but as lazy as f**KDavidPayne wrote:Clifford Etienne could maintain a strong output, couldn't knock the top off a rice pudding nor take one on the chin but he did work hard from bell to bell, if memory serves....him v Clay-Bey is a mini-classic.Jeff Thomas wrote: Yep totally agree with this.
http://boxingwriter.co.uk/2008/09/30/la ... -the-vest/
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
I am going to go for Tyson Fury as well. He has the reach, handspeed and the power in his punches and can switch between head and body very well. It will a very entertaining fight to watch but I reckon Fury will stop Larry Olubamiwo in the latter rounds.
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
The only time Fury has been hit hard was by himself with his own uppercut.
Larry would test his chin to the max.
As i said earlier if he looses some muscle and could be sure of going the full 12 then im sure Fury would
be out of there.
I suspect Larry is probably reading these posts with interest and knows exactly what he needs to do ;;-)
Larry would test his chin to the max.
As i said earlier if he looses some muscle and could be sure of going the full 12 then im sure Fury would
be out of there.
I suspect Larry is probably reading these posts with interest and knows exactly what he needs to do ;;-)
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23117
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
Fury is been seriously underestimated on here due to his lack of conditioning.He beat Mcdermott after 9 fights!I love Larry,but its not as easy as it looks chinning the former aba champ who went the distance with our Olympic bronze medalist David Price.For all his faults,Fury can box.Spiker wrote:The only time Fury has been hit hard was by himself with his own uppercut.
Larry would test his chin to the max.
As i said earlier if he looses some muscle and could be sure of going the full 12 then im sure Fury would
be out of there.
I suspect Larry is probably reading these posts with interest and knows exactly what he needs to do ;;-)
Re: Fury vs Olubamiwo?
At British level, he can take a punch too. McDermott hits hard enough and Fury more than stood up to them for 19 odd rounds.
Maloney seems to be keeping his trio of heavyweights away from decent punchers.
Maloney seems to be keeping his trio of heavyweights away from decent punchers.