Cleveland Williams vs

Post Reply
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Cleveland Williams vs

Post by yancey »

Floyd Patterson
Ingemar Johanssen
Rocky Marciano
Joe Frazier


Primes for all, of course.

What happens?
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Patterson gets off the deck to KO Williams.

A fight with Johansson is toss-up material. I'll take the straight right to find its mark quicker than the left hook. Another KO loss.

Marciano, for mine, has more trouble with Williams than many predict. Still butchers him, dices him, & boxes him up for shipping in the end, though. About nine rounds. Marciano possibly off his feet early.

Frazier would've taken him down at some point.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by dempseyfire »

I think he knocks Patterson out. D'Amato steered Floyd away from Cleveland for a reason and he knew his fighter better than we did. Cleveland's handspeed negates Floyd's usual big advantage and he'd have considerable size and reach advantages.

Johansson is 50/50. I hate this cliche but it's truly one of those "whoever lands big first" wins scenarios.

Marciano and Frazier break him down for KO wins around the mid-late rounds, but they could both be hurt and/or dropped early.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by yancey »

dempseyfire wrote:I think he knocks Patterson out. D'Amato steered Floyd away from Cleveland for a reason and he knew his fighter better than we did. Cleveland's handspeed negates Floyd's usual big advantage and he'd have considerable size and reach advantages.

Johansson is 50/50. I hate this cliche but it's truly one of those "whoever lands big first" wins scenarios.

Marciano and Frazier break him down for KO wins around the mid-late rounds, but they could both be hurt and/or dropped early.
Agree that he knocks out Floyd.

I think he knocks out Ingo, too.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by Flump »

He has a punchers chance but I think he loses by ko to all of them, Williams lost every time he stepped up to these guy's level.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by dempseyfire »

Lost everytime he stepped up to Liston's level? B/c Patterson was beaten much worse than Cleveland was?

Pre-shooting he forced a draw to the very slick Eddie Machen, knocked out Terrell and IMO deserved the decision in the rematch.

His career post-1964 clearly must be put into context, as he was a guy fighting in a severely depleted physical state, and even then he only lost to top ranked guys (besides O'Halloran when he was beyond washed up in 1971)
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by Flump »

Like I said, he has a punchers chance. Drawing with Machen and beating Ernie Terrell doesn't make him a lock against Patterson, who was better than both of those guys.

Patterson proved his mettle when past his best, and without D'Amato picking his challengers carefully, through the 60's and into the 70's, only Liston, Ingo and Ali stopped him, all three better than Williams.
thehero55
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 28 Jun 2003, 18:10

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by thehero55 »

Cleveland was an underrated puncher, Id give him a 20% chance against Frazier, 30% vs Ingo and 55% vs. Patterson. Dont see him beating Marciano
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by dempseyfire »

Flump wrote:Like I said, he has a punchers chance. Drawing with Machen and beating Ernie Terrell doesn't make him a lock against Patterson, who was better than both of those guys.

.
I'd make Terrell a solid favorite over Patterson in the mid 60s.

Ingo was better than Williams? In what respect? Cleveland was bigger, faster and a more complete boxer.

Patterson is one of those guys who gets underrated at times but is also overrated by many b/c he was such a fan favorite. He lost fair and square to Ellis and should've lost to Bonavena as well.
gambler49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 405
Joined: 07 Mar 2009, 02:54

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by gambler49 »

I'd say Marciano & Frazier stop him... And the other 2 are hard to call. However my money would be on Floyd to KO him, but I wouldn't like my bet. And the other one is even tighter, and I can't call it. It's one of them matches where a smart gambler keeps his $ in his pocket on that one. However if u put a revolver to my head id go Bingo.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

dempseyfire wrote:
Flump wrote:Like I said, he has a punchers chance. Drawing with Machen and beating Ernie Terrell doesn't make him a lock against Patterson, who was better than both of those guys.

.
I'd make Terrell a solid favorite over Patterson in the mid 60s.

Ingo was better than Williams? In what respect? Cleveland was bigger, faster and a more complete boxer.

Patterson is one of those guys who gets underrated at times but is also overrated by many b/c he was such a fan favorite. He lost fair and square to Ellis and should've lost to Bonavena as well.
He was washed-up against both of those men, & he beat Ellis plain as day in my book. That whole scenario stank, & robbed Patterson of a slice of prestigious history Ali would later claim as his own.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by Flump »

dempseyfire wrote:
Flump wrote:Like I said, he has a punchers chance. Drawing with Machen and beating Ernie Terrell doesn't make him a lock against Patterson, who was better than both of those guys.

.
I'd make Terrell a solid favorite over Patterson in the mid 60s.

Ingo was better than Williams? In what respect? Cleveland was bigger, faster and a more complete boxer.

Patterson is one of those guys who gets underrated at times but is also overrated by many b/c he was such a fan favorite. He lost fair and square to Ellis and should've lost to Bonavena as well.

Maybe, his size, chin and spoiling style would give Patterson problems but that's another story.

Ingo was better in a results respect, one of Williams selling points is his draw v Machen, well Ingo hammered him inside a round, he also ko'd Patterson two wins that are lacking on The Big Cat's resume. Williams may have looked smoother but his results and what I've seen of him to me don't suggest that he was as good as you think IMHO. And you had this one 50/50 yourself.

Patterson was definitely vulnerable but I just don't see Williams as a favourite over him, his reputation seems to be largely based on hurting Liston in the first fight and wacking out a procession of stiffs and a few decent journeymen.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by dempseyfire »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:
Flump wrote:Like I said, he has a punchers chance. Drawing with Machen and beating Ernie Terrell doesn't make him a lock against Patterson, who was better than both of those guys.

.
I'd make Terrell a solid favorite over Patterson in the mid 60s.

Ingo was better than Williams? In what respect? Cleveland was bigger, faster and a more complete boxer.

Patterson is one of those guys who gets underrated at times but is also overrated by many b/c he was such a fan favorite. He lost fair and square to Ellis and should've lost to Bonavena as well.
He was washed-up against both of those men, & he beat Ellis plain as day in my book. That whole scenario stank, & robbed Patterson of a slice of prestigious history Ali would later claim as his own.
Yep, such a 'horrible robbery' that the AP scorecard or any other persons I've ever seen with a win for Floyd scores 4 or more rounds even :lol: What is that about? Patterson came on strong in the end but for most of the fight did nothing.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Do you contend Patterson was not significantly past-it at the time of those bouts, too?
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Cleveland Williams vs

Post by dempseyfire »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Do you contend Patterson was not significantly past-it at the time of those bouts, too?
He was past his prime but significantly past for the Ellis bout I'd say no.
Post Reply