Hatton Round By Round

brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by brian13 »

I had it 115-115
Achybreaky
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:54

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by Achybreaky »

What a fuckin joke.....hatton got battered....the commentary was atrocious and those scores are seriously up the left..Another depressing night for boxing when this shit gets pulled.

You could give it to hatton by 1 or 2 rounds max..but to give him every round apart from the first?!!!!!
Last edited by Achybreaky on 16 Jul 2010, 18:07, edited 1 time in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by crusader »

What were the scores?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22958
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by mickey1975 »

sg1985 wrote:I thought he won it. Too wide on the cards though.
x2
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by crusader »

Wow, those were some shitty scores. I thought Nuz won, but it could have gone either way. All three cards were BS though
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by dajuggernaut »

Oh thank god Hatton won. I didn't watch the fight but judging from this thread it seemed like a very close fight, you guys almost gave me a heart attack.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27457
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by stujones »

When I heard the scores I though Nuz had it..... given the KD and all. I thought they'd gone for aggression.

I thought a draw would have been fair, rediculous cards.
Go Faster Stripes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 17:56

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by Go Faster Stripes »

whicker wrote:
Go Faster Stripes wrote:Cant believe anyone can score it by 7 rounds to Hatton!
Its worse than that- given one was a 10-8, that judge only felt Hatton lost ONE other round..
Yes I had him winning by a couple of rounds, we have seen some terrible judging on Sky recently.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

crusader wrote:What were the scores?
117-110
116-111 x2 (i think, couldn't remember how many they gave Nuz :oops: )
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by crusader »

jBacca wrote:
crusader wrote:What were the scores?
117-110
116-111 x2 (i think, couldn't remember how many they gave Nuz :oops: )
Yep, those are the scores listed on fightnews as well. Pretty crappy judging. How on earth do these judges come up with such BS. People scoring from their computers are doing a much better job.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27457
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by stujones »

Matthew, in a strange way, is fast becoming one of my favourite British fighters. In terms of natural talent he shouldn't be near EBU title class. His defence isn't great, no power, nothing "classy" really.

BUT, he is very hard and fights to the best of his ability. His "nouse" is making him fight at a level beyond his talent and when you think of the fighters wasting their talent - you have to take your hat of to him.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

crusader wrote:
jBacca wrote:
crusader wrote:What were the scores?
117-110
116-111 x2 (i think, couldn't remember how many they gave Nuz :oops: )
Yep, those are the scores listed on fightnews as well. Pretty crappy judging. How on earth do these judges come up with such BS. People scoring from their computers are doing a much better job.
Shame it's a common occurrence these days.
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by Srebmun »

Interesting there was only 1 punch in difference in the punch stats.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22333
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by Horse »

mickey1975 wrote:
sg1985 wrote:I thought he won it. Too wide on the cards though.
x2
I also agree.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by crusader »

stujones wrote:Matthew, in a strange way, is fast becoming one of my favourite British fighters. In terms of natural talent he shouldn't be near EBU title class. His defence isn't great, no power, nothing "classy" really.

BUT, he is very hard and fights to the best of his ability. His "nouse" is making him fight at a level beyond his talent and when you think of the fighters wasting their talent - you have to take your hat of to him.
I agree. He seems to really want to win and it is evident when he was fighting. What I was most impressed with was the way he closed the rounds strong. It probably won him a few on the cards he didn't really deserve.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by whicker »

stujones wrote:His "nouse" is making him fight at a level beyond his talent and when you think of the fighters wasting their talent - you have to take your hat of to him.
Time will tell- a bit like Martin Rogan, I suppose.

At some point, Hatton will be matched against someone who really takes advatage ... sorry but true. Or maybe he never will.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

Feck, they aren't showing all the Murray fight.
Jesus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 340
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 15:00

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by Jesus »

england is now worse than germany....word of advice for fighters fighting an englishman on sky......dont let it go to the cards!!!
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by crusader »

Srebmun wrote:Interesting there was only 1 punch in difference in the punch stats.
I think Hatton's punches were a lot flashier and more of them were to the head. Nuz did a lot of solid, but unspectacular work, and threw a lot more body punches, which can go unoticed. Add to that the fact that the crowd was cheering everytime Hatton threw, and you get ridiculous scores. The one punch difference shows how close the fight was.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by whicker »

jBacca wrote:Feck, they aren't showing all the Murray fight.
Yeah, just limited highlights. shame.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Would rather see some of Askin and Quigg TBH
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by crusader »

Murray not really impressing me
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by Srebmun »

crusader wrote:Murray not really impressing me
He has his moments where he looks good I think, but he could work more. His languid style at times reminds me of earlier Cotto.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

Murray didn't look spectacular, but at least he's got the 12 rounds in. He said he could step it up, lets hope he does when he faces tougher opposition!

Quigg v Reid now... cannot wait. :box:
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Hatton Round By Round

Post by jBacca »

Round fvcking 7.
Post Reply