Did Galento have a neck?BoxBuzz wrote:Galento...
Sort of reminds you of George the Animal Steele?
What if George would have become a boxer?
Gambler do you think you should start a thread on that topic?
That head looks wrong for that body.
Did Galento have a neck?BoxBuzz wrote:Galento...
Sort of reminds you of George the Animal Steele?
What if George would have become a boxer?
Gambler do you think you should start a thread on that topic?








All these guys hav fighters bodies for sure.Robinson wrote:Do you want to see a good " Grapplers "body ? No idea where the myth
that looking like or being built like Brock is ideal for Grappling... grappling
requires more mobility and less strength than striking does.
Just a sampling of some of the best MMA grappler-wrestler sorts to have entered the
cage. Hardly an epic Comic Book build amongst them.
Alot of these guys train just to fight... and if they have good genetics then so
be it, they look buff. Alot of other fighters train to fight AND to package themselves
for advertising, movies, etc etc....hence why body building (in what ever guise)
is a common instrument in most combat sports these days. If you look the
part you attract people to the sport.
You are too kind. It damn near looks photoshoppedyancey wrote:Did Galento have a neck?BoxBuzz wrote:Galento...
Sort of reminds you of George the Animal Steele?
What if George would have become a boxer?
Gambler do you think you should start a thread on that topic?
That head looks wrong for that body.
I appreciate where your coming from on this Barry but I'm afraid I'm a non beleiver. I guess I would really need someone like you to tailor one of these programmes for me and i would give it a try but I am highly skeptical.BarryWashington wrote:I can see how some people may feel this way/experience this however; when done properly weight training can be a great thing for a boxer. The problem is 90% of people who lift don't know what they're doing rather they're following a magazine/someone else's program. If you can tailor a program that is sport specific and incorporate either body weight or weighted plyometrics, it can most certainly improve all the things you mentioned (of course it is a must to stretch regularly so the lactic acid build up doesn't effect mobility.)mugabi wrote:gambler49 wrote: This is where ur missing the point. I'm not banging on about mucsle size etc. But the things that count: big shoulders, long arms, short body to leg ratio, thick neck and waist.
U could say that Marciano didn't have the best body, but he made very good of it. But thats not the point.
Btw big muscles are a big disadvantage in boxing as im sure u well know.
I concur , in this age of built up fighters, it has almost become fashionable for trainers to include weight training and magazines to harp on about weights helping a fighter. Sure they probably help a grappling MMA artist but for boxing its a no no in my personal experience. I have boxed at amateur level and hold a high ranking belt in judo. Undoubtedly weights help you in judo but in boxing they seriously affect hand speed and flexibility and mobility.
A good fighters physique is one with big shoulders, naturally muscular arms,a strong wrist and neck muscles and very importantly a strong midsection which helps generate power. of course the great Thomas Hearns had a incredible physique around 1984-87.

Eubank would of won easy!orbtastic wrote:Mark Prince...always wondered how that fight with Eubank would have turned out.
GranberryReturns wrote:I prefer the lads with broad backs, narrow waists, and broad shoulders.
overman129 wrote:To be honest, I always felt Dariusz Michalczewski had a sweet chassis. He reminded me of a Polish Patrick Duffy.
oliverfennell wrote:Steve Cunningham
Dude has an EIGHT-pack!