Paul Appleby

billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by billy nelson »

cbellshaw wrote:No1, i agree that he shouldn't walk straight into a title shot after being inactive. Also think rickys too experienced at this stage but like to see the boys from up here get opportunities. I'm sure ricky will produce on the 4th and wish you both the best.
cheers colin, i agree theres a lot of talent in Scotland and it would help if if they won a few more title to get more tv shows up here because we have some very passionate fans and it would help encourage youngsters into the sport.send my regards to the lads in the gym. :bag:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Counter-puncher »

Top Dog wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:why on earth he had 15 months out is beyond me :surprised:
Tommy Gilmour?

Why Tommy? he doesnt manage Paul, and I am sure it was the wee mans choice not to fight so that his contract could run out.
ok thanks for that. :TU:
kerrminator
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 120
Joined: 27 Apr 2006, 18:58

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by kerrminator »

Spoke to paul on Thursday and he is raring to go. He just took some time out to have a rest as Tommy had pushed him quite hard for a lad so young. Paul didnt even get 25% of 100k btw lol
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Counter-puncher »

cheers Paul :TU:
Smokin Preedy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 118
Joined: 04 Mar 2010, 10:01

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Smokin Preedy »

All the best Paul. Nice to see he is raring to go at this new weight.
bluenoseshf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 16 Mar 2010, 13:46

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by bluenoseshf »

Hopefully Paul can come thru the fight on Sat with no injuries etc so he can push on from there. Maybe a brit eliminator after that then sykes for the british if all this go to plan, i think paul has a big future in the game and this last couple of years was just a small set back.
cutthecacklebullyup
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 14:04

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by cutthecacklebullyup »

cbellshaw wrote:No1, i agree that he shouldn't walk straight into a title shot after being inactive. Also think rickys too experienced at this stage but like to see the boys from up here get opportunities. I'm sure ricky will produce on the 4th and wish you both the best.


Defo think appleby has a shed load more potential than burns.Ok ,would be to soon at the moment ,but look what he achieved so young.a fight at the moment would prob be similar to when burns fought arthur,with arthur too mature at that time.looking at applebys frame i think
he will be even better now he has moved up. so bring on appleby v burns a great fight for scottish fans! :TU: what ye think ft?
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by billy nelson »

cutthecacklebullyup wrote:
cbellshaw wrote:No1, i agree that he shouldn't walk straight into a title shot after being inactive. Also think rickys too experienced at this stage but like to see the boys from up here get opportunities. I'm sure ricky will produce on the 4th and wish you both the best.


Defo think appleby has a shed load more potential than burns.Ok ,would be to soon at the moment ,but look what he achieved so young.a fight at the moment would prob be similar to when burns fought arthur,with arthur too mature at that time.looking at applebys frame i think
he will be even better now he has moved up. so bring on appleby v burns a great fight for scottish fans! :TU: what ye think ft?
Mate Ricky Burns would stop or outclass Paul Appleby if they were to meet and you know what Paul knows it! :bag:
cutthecacklebullyup
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 14:04

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by cutthecacklebullyup »

billy nelson wrote:
cutthecacklebullyup wrote:
cbellshaw wrote:No1, i agree that he shouldn't walk straight into a title shot after being inactive. Also think rickys too experienced at this stage but like to see the boys from up here get opportunities. I'm sure ricky will produce on the 4th and wish you both the best.


Defo think appleby has a shed load more potential than burns.Ok ,would be to soon at the moment ,but look what he achieved so young.a fight at the moment would prob be similar to when burns fought arthur,with arthur too mature at that time.looking at applebys frame i think
he will be even better now he has moved up. so bring on appleby v burns a great fight for scottish fans! :TU: what ye think ft?
Mate Ricky Burns would stop or outclass Paul Appleby if they were to meet and you know what Paul knows it! :bag:
Well after burns loses on saturday(which i hope he doesn't coz ill be there cheerin all the scots boys on)it could be that they could meet at domestic level in the next 12 months or so
as a fight fan it would be a fight i would pay to see!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Counter-puncher »

it would be an interesting matchup :TU:
kerrminator
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 120
Joined: 27 Apr 2006, 18:58

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by kerrminator »

Counter-puncher wrote:cheers Paul :TU:

Hey CP hows trix. long time no see :)
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Counter-puncher »

good thanks mate hope you're well :TU:
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3344
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Twinkle Toes »

I have always rated Appleby, but was probably moved into the British title scene a little bit too quickly.

Mr Warren will look after him, and he should flourish under him.
kerrminator
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 120
Joined: 27 Apr 2006, 18:58

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by kerrminator »

Twinkle Toes wrote:I have always rated Appleby, but was probably moved into the British title scene a little bit too quickly.

Mr Warren will look after him, and he should flourish under him.
I agree it was a bit too much too quick. He was the youngest brit to win the lonsdale featherweight title in history if memory serves but the pace of his rise could certainly have been more controlled. The Lindsay fight was a big night in his career and gilmour had him in the ring fighting about 5 weeks before it not to mention giving away home advantage to the challenger (maybe how the 100k rumour started)

Bags of potential though and only 23 and under Warren he will have the time to develop properly. He is looking very comfortable at the new weight too.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Appleby

Post by Counter-puncher »

i always said he had outgrown featherweight
Post Reply