Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by DavidPayne »

Surely he needs to add something back in here...he has to pull out a name for Macklin doesn't he?

Andy Lee, Bronko McKart, Kasim Ouma, Sam Soliman and Campos all have fights scheduled in September.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Adamj1987 »

DavidPayne wrote:Surely he needs to add something back in here...he has to pull out a name for Macklin doesn't he?

Andy Lee, Bronko McKart, Kasim Ouma, Sam Soliman and Campos all have fights scheduled in September.
please be mckart
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22948
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by mickey1975 »

Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Autobarn »

mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Adamj1987 »

Autobarn wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
he has with an injury
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by leforge »

mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
Thats what I thought other promotors not happy.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Counter-puncher »

Adamj1987 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Any coincidence the only two to pull out are non FW promoted fighters?I know Rhodes is co-managed by him but he boxed for Hatton and has desperately wanted to get away from Fwank for years.
are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
he has with an injury
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Adamj1987 »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:are you saying rhodes has pulled out vs konekny?
he has with an injury
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
its on the boxrec home page as the latest news story
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Counter-puncher »

part of me actually wants the whole card to be cancelled now :(
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Horse »

The main event is off and one of the main support fights is off. Can this still be a PPV?

Cleverly vs Murat
Brook vs Jennings
Maccarinelli vs Frenkel
Chisora vs Sexton
DeGale vs Dilks
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Deno1986 »

Adamj1987 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote: he has with an injury
oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
its on the boxrec home page as the latest news story
Is the bill called the 'Famous Five' now?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by leforge »

The card not on the sky schedules?
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Adamj1987 »

Deno1986 wrote:
Adamj1987 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote: oh fvck me, no, no, nooooooo. :(
its on the boxrec home page as the latest news story
Is the bill called the 'Famous Five' now?
im expecting more to drop out now
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Autobarn »

fantastic four?

heroic trio?

dynamic duo?

remember the last time a "card of the year" came along? froch-inkin, murray-fewkes and witter-bradley. froch ended up with rybaki, murray ended up with hamidi and witter lost!
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Adamj1987 »

Autobarn wrote:fantastic four?

heroic trio?

dynamic duo?

remember the last time a "card of the year" came along? froch-inkin, murray-fewkes and witter-bradley. froch ended up with rybaki, murray ended up with hamidi and witter lost!
indeed i was there at that 1 as well maybe im jinxing them
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22948
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by mickey1975 »

At present,im just as interested in this Saturday now.A great double header.
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Deno1986 »

mickey1975 wrote:At present,im just as interested in this Saturday now.A great double header.
Couldn't agree more.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Counter-puncher »

Autobarn wrote:fantastic four?

heroic trio?

dynamic duo?

remember the last time a "card of the year" came along? froch-inkin, murray-fewkes and witter-bradley. froch ended up with rybaki, murray ended up with hamidi and witter lost!
fvck off i had tickets to that one too :(
paddyavh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 12 Apr 2008, 04:29

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by paddyavh »

Horse wrote:The main event is off and one of the main support fights is off. Can this still be a PPV?

Cleverly vs Murat
Brook vs Jennings
Maccarinelli vs Frenkel
Chisora vs Sexton
DeGale vs Dilks
I persume its got to be as it would have all been budgeted in. I got a £150 ringside ticket, cant be arsed to go now.

Bet FW comes up with a 35+ ex world champion for Macklin.
HomeOfBritishBoxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by HomeOfBritishBoxing »

bet brook-jennings is off soon
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by bfchunk »

REAL_DEAL wrote:If sky also add the Mosley bill (undercard is good) then it will be worth it.
This would seem the best way to rescue this as a PPV now
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by leforge »

Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Spud »

leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.

Told you smelt a rat!!! :TU:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by leforge »

Spud wrote:
leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.

Told you smelt a rat!!! :TU:
I wonder who macklin will face now? Anymore news from your corner shop?
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Spud »

leforge wrote:
Spud wrote:
leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
Told you smelt a rat!!! :TU:
I wonder who macklin will face now? Anymore news from your corner shop?
Nope - but he was right about another pull out !!! - got the name right too - luck I say - I am getting sick of the **** - wont tell me about the December/Jan show - whilst I was there the phone rang - he said to the bloke on the other end of the line "hang on a minute got to tell spud to f*ck off or he will tell boxrec" - so the drums are starting to beat again :TU:

I am going to refuse to buy anything again in there - he will wilt as he always does and then I can annoy the f*cking life out of you lot - by stating I know something but cant tell you - someone is bound to bite.

Back to that Magnificent 7 bill - one fight has a decent replacement.
Post Reply