Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6148
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

leforge wrote:Barker too Vacate it says on boxing news site.
:oops: :>

just so pathetically predictable.

what is it with our promoters.

work together u arseholes. :x
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Spud »

Might be a world title shot or a decent world rated opponent for Darren?? :TU:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by leforge »

Khan fight in dec will be with hatton joint promoting I read. So Rhodes on that bill?
wadey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 272
Joined: 01 Sep 2010, 07:00

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by wadey »

I can see Macklin fighting the guy that Rhodes was going to. He is registered as a Middleweight!!!!
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by DavidPayne »

paddyavh wrote:
Horse wrote:The main event is off and one of the main support fights is off. Can this still be a PPV?

Cleverly vs Murat
Brook vs Jennings
Maccarinelli vs Frenkel
Chisora vs Sexton
DeGale vs Dilks
I persume its got to be as it would have all been budgeted in. I got a £150 ringside ticket, cant be arsed to go now.

Bet FW comes up with a 35+ ex world champion for Macklin.
Campos, McKart, Lee and Solimon all have fights in September.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Counter-puncher »

kassim Ouma.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by DavidPayne »

Yep him too.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Chambers2 »

GRRRRRRRFUCKINGRRRRRRRR

That's the fight of the night done, I might even keep me £14.99 in my sky rocket
levi billups
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 89
Joined: 07 Jun 2008, 11:29

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by levi billups »

The bill will eventually be renamed 'The Lone Ranger - Maccarinelli v TBA'.
bigh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 88
Joined: 06 Aug 2010, 13:58

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by bigh »

hahahaahhahaahahahahahahahhahahaahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHO WAS RIGHT THEN LADS? ulot slated me on here a few weeks ago think i need some apologises. would love to see martin murray given a chance think he deserves it and may cause macklin a few problems not saying he would win though.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Autobarn »

i don't think it will quite be martin murray.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by palooka »

bigh wrote:hahahaahhahaahahahahahahahhahahaahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHO WAS RIGHT THEN LADS? ulot slated me on here a few weeks ago think i need some apologises. would love to see martin murray given a chance think he deserves it and may cause macklin a few problems not saying he would win though.
You were right before the media and everyone else :bow: fair play to you.

I apologise :oops:

Do you really post under different names?

Will Jennings v Brook come off?
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by caffrey »

says on the sky website that macklin is now facing a dodgy eastern european for the vacant euro title and matthew hall is coming in for rhodes. Better than nothing i suppose ,matthew hall always gives a good fight,but the opponent for mackiln , JOMARDASHVILI was beaten over six by martin murray so isnt really worthy of a title shot
dutchie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 159
Joined: 25 Sep 2009, 13:23

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by dutchie »

The guy Macklin is now fighting is a bum rated at 125 in boxrec ratings...not worthy of a shot for a great title,pity Barker is injured.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by SAPFO »

Broadhurst v TBA

I know not one of the main card, but a home fighter with support.



So can someone clarify who the fvck is figthing? I notice the ticket has no mention of 'Magnificent 7' on it?
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by whiteboy »

Don is fighting Najah Ali for International Masters Banatamweight Title 8)
bigh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 88
Joined: 06 Aug 2010, 13:58

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by bigh »

no mate dnt post under different names..
think the jennings fight will go ahead.
Post Reply