SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
-
Podmore_Birmingham
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 950
- Joined: 18 Oct 2005, 09:38
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
I scored it a draw and wouldn't have argued had it gone either way.
Had Smith up by one after four and had it level after eight.
To be honest, a fight such as that will only make Smith a better fighter in the long run. It's hard to look good against a canny operator like Simpson.
To this day, i've never seen a more complete debut showing than Smith's against Shaun Walton two years ago. Brilliant.
Had Smith up by one after four and had it level after eight.
To be honest, a fight such as that will only make Smith a better fighter in the long run. It's hard to look good against a canny operator like Simpson.
To this day, i've never seen a more complete debut showing than Smith's against Shaun Walton two years ago. Brilliant.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
I nodded off after the 9th. Which isn't meant to be insightful, sarcastic or otherwise judgemental - its just what happened and was testimony to the rigours of parenthood. I awoke to the decision.
However, I had Smith one up(ish) after 8-9 rounds.
Swifty did well and will grow from this test but I'd have liked to see him make his speed pay for longer.
However, I had Smith one up(ish) after 8-9 rounds.
Swifty did well and will grow from this test but I'd have liked to see him make his speed pay for longer.
-
SweetLikeSugar
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 376
- Joined: 24 Aug 2010, 15:37
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
That's exactly what I was thinking.Lenny wrote:Smith looked okay, I thought he nicked a close one but his lack of work up close was alarming. In my opinion he had the tools to beat Simpson comfortably but the times when he looked good hurting Simpson to the body or timing him with straight one twos, he'd follow it up by smothering his own work, trying to clinch and getting caught. In a way, it was fairly similar to his brothers last couple of fights.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5429
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
I had Smith winning it by a round. It was close though and could have gone either way really.
Simpson is a tough guy, so I always thought it would be close. Great fight for Smith to have under his belt at an early stage in his career.
Simpson is a tough guy, so I always thought it would be close. Great fight for Smith to have under his belt at an early stage in his career.
-
HomeOfBritishBoxing
- Heavyweight

Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
explain to me how i am slagging smith off...stevek3lly wrote:Look it was very, very close. You are all slagging Smith off on here, but lets remember the seasoned pro Simpson didn't really do too much either. It was a close fight and the judges obviously went with the agressor Smith who was decent for the first half. Personally had Simpson by 1, but that was scoring 10-10 rounds as well. They appear to have gone nowaday as judges are looking more for the winners. Smith has even said he will give a rematch, so thats the next step for me.HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:looks like everybody thought simpson nicked it, including myself. looks like swifty isn't what all the scousers made him out to be.
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
I had Swifty winning by 5 watching live.
After a 2nd and 3rd viewing, I've still got Smith winning but it was a lot closer than my original score
After a 2nd and 3rd viewing, I've still got Smith winning but it was a lot closer than my original score
-
Samuel Brooks
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 86
- Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 06:52
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Undefeated wrote:toomanyshots wrote:No way did Smith win that fight!!! It was competitive yes but Simpson pushed ahead towards the end.
I was live at the fight, the shots Simpson hit Smith were far greater and more frequent.
I lost count the number of times Smith had spray sent flying from his head.
I felt Smiths body language at the end the fight told you what he thought the result was.
Simpson robbed again!! but this time at fking home due to it being on a FW show!
Am fed up with this! Why has Simpson continually being held back when Burns is fighting for world belts.
The least Simpson should have fought for by now is the European.
You could see this result had ripped the stomach from him again!!
Well said.
Simpson is an FW fighter as well.......bang goes the theory that FW was cooking the result to favour his fighter Smith!
Close fight which could have gone either way. I thought Simpson had done enough, and yes, Smith did look dejected after the final bell..........but 2 of the judges obviously thought he had done enough, regardless of where the fight was and who is whos fighter.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
No robbery, just a very close decision that could have gone either way. Smith's stamina is excellent considering it was his first time going the distance, obviously he still has a good bit of work to do which is to be expected as he only has a handful of pro fights. I think Lindsay will be too much for him at this stage of his career. Swifty seems to be a good lad, down to earth and no bullsh1t. I felt sorry for Simpson after losing another close decision, he is just one of those fighters that never seems to get the nod.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Would like to firstly thanks everyone for all the messages, congrats, support and criticism. I will definitely give John a rematch, he deserves that as he didnt have to fight me, he could easily have moved on to European level but never, he accepted my challenge and im grateful for that.
I set out to box John, as I did in the first few rounds, then I broke my left hand at the end of the 4th or 5th and started leading with rights and lungin in and gettin messy, smothering up close. Neglecting my jab. Gutted really but all things I can put right.
People need to remember, I have gone to a GOOD CHAMPIONS backyard after 10 fights and fought for the Comonwealth Title in a very hostile atmosphere. A lot of prospects are still knocking bums over 20 fight in. I will make mistakes yes but feel im learning in the best way possible as I will have learnt more from that Simpson fight that I would have in another 10 bums.
Thanks again for all the support, hope you all had a good night.
P.S Congratulations Ricky Burns.
I set out to box John, as I did in the first few rounds, then I broke my left hand at the end of the 4th or 5th and started leading with rights and lungin in and gettin messy, smothering up close. Neglecting my jab. Gutted really but all things I can put right.
People need to remember, I have gone to a GOOD CHAMPIONS backyard after 10 fights and fought for the Comonwealth Title in a very hostile atmosphere. A lot of prospects are still knocking bums over 20 fight in. I will make mistakes yes but feel im learning in the best way possible as I will have learnt more from that Simpson fight that I would have in another 10 bums.
Thanks again for all the support, hope you all had a good night.
P.S Congratulations Ricky Burns.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Top reply. I think everyone (well almost everyone) appreciates the balls you showed making the step up to fight someone as good as Simpson in his backyard after so few fights. Some people are always going to go over the top in declaring really close fights a robbery (Johnny Nelson didn't help).$wifty wrote:Would like to firstly thanks everyone for all the messages, congrats, support and criticism. I will definitely give John a rematch, he deserves that as he didnt have to fight me, he could easily have moved on to European level but never, he accepted my challenge and im grateful for that.
I set out to box John, as I did in the first few rounds, then I broke my left hand at the end of the 4th or 5th and started leading with rights and lungin in and gettin messy, smothering up close. Neglecting my jab. Gutted really but all things I can put right.
People need to remember, I have gone to a GOOD CHAMPIONS backyard after 10 fights and fought for the Comonwealth Title in a very hostile atmosphere. A lot of prospects are still knocking bums over 20 fight in. I will make mistakes yes but feel im learning in the best way possible as I will have learnt more from that Simpson fight that I would have in another 10 bums.
Thanks again for all the support, hope you all had a good night.
P.S Congratulations Ricky Burns.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
$wifty wrote:Would like to firstly thanks everyone for all the messages, congrats, support and criticism. I will definitely give John a rematch, he deserves that as he didnt have to fight me, he could easily have moved on to European level but never, he accepted my challenge and im grateful for that.
I set out to box John, as I did in the first few rounds, then I broke my left hand at the end of the 4th or 5th and started leading with rights and lungin in and gettin messy, smothering up close. Neglecting my jab. Gutted really but all things I can put right.
People need to remember, I have gone to a GOOD CHAMPIONS backyard after 10 fights and fought for the Comonwealth Title in a very hostile atmosphere. A lot of prospects are still knocking bums over 20 fight in. I will make mistakes yes but feel im learning in the best way possible as I will have learnt more from that Simpson fight that I would have in another 10 bums.
Thanks again for all the support, hope you all had a good night.
P.S Congratulations Ricky Burns.
Well done
-
daveyboy123
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 28 Aug 2010, 07:10
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
It certainly wasnt a robbery although I think a draw would have been a fair result. Congrats to Swifty, he did very well and I can understand why he clinched so much now he has explained his damaged hand. The lad did well so early in his pro career. I do feel for Simpson though, I think he deserved the draw.
Well done to Ricky burns!
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Well done to Ricky burns!
-
The Kirkby Kid
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5
- Joined: 14 Dec 2008, 18:30
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
mickey1975 wrote:The MC was correct,a split decision is called a majority in BritainThe Kirkby Kid wrote:This was an extremely close fight and it genuinely could have gone either way. I was surprised that Smith was given the decision, especially as he was challenging and was fighting in Scotland. Still, really pleased that he won and that Liverpool has another champion.
One annoying thing though, MC Mark Burdis really needs to practice his delivery when it comes to announcing judges' decisions. I'm sure he said that it was a majority decision - it was a split decision!
Is this right? I am happy to stand corrected on this. I always thought that where two judges go for one fighter with the other going for the other that this should be announced as a split decision. The UK press seems to report it this way! I'll check out what Boxing News classify the result as in Thursday's issue! Boxrec.com certainly records the result as a Split Decision!
-
doctorboxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 951
- Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Congratulations! I did think that you looked the more accomplished boxer and certainly very quick. I thought John shaded it due to his workrate but I assume your hand injury would have had a big impact. A re-match would be great as the fight was a great lead up to the main event.$wifty wrote:Would like to firstly thanks everyone for all the messages, congrats, support and criticism. I will definitely give John a rematch, he deserves that as he didnt have to fight me, he could easily have moved on to European level but never, he accepted my challenge and im grateful for that.
I set out to box John, as I did in the first few rounds, then I broke my left hand at the end of the 4th or 5th and started leading with rights and lungin in and gettin messy, smothering up close. Neglecting my jab. Gutted really but all things I can put right.
People need to remember, I have gone to a GOOD CHAMPIONS backyard after 10 fights and fought for the Comonwealth Title in a very hostile atmosphere. A lot of prospects are still knocking bums over 20 fight in. I will make mistakes yes but feel im learning in the best way possible as I will have learnt more from that Simpson fight that I would have in another 10 bums.
Thanks again for all the support, hope you all had a good night.
P.S Congratulations Ricky Burns.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Keep up the hard graft mate, you're going places.$wifty wrote:Would like to firstly thanks everyone for all the messages, congrats, support and criticism. I will definitely give John a rematch, he deserves that as he didnt have to fight me, he could easily have moved on to European level but never, he accepted my challenge and im grateful for that.
I set out to box John, as I did in the first few rounds, then I broke my left hand at the end of the 4th or 5th and started leading with rights and lungin in and gettin messy, smothering up close. Neglecting my jab. Gutted really but all things I can put right.
People need to remember, I have gone to a GOOD CHAMPIONS backyard after 10 fights and fought for the Comonwealth Title in a very hostile atmosphere. A lot of prospects are still knocking bums over 20 fight in. I will make mistakes yes but feel im learning in the best way possible as I will have learnt more from that Simpson fight that I would have in another 10 bums.
Thanks again for all the support, hope you all had a good night.
P.S Congratulations Ricky Burns.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
was a great night, top atmosphere all the best 
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Close fight that could've gone either way, but I had Simpson edging it
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Was nice meeting you mate.diggler wrote:was a great night, top atmosphere all the best
Whens ya next show?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22948
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
They are the same thing.Traditionally though,it would be announced as a majority over here.Nowadays some will use split and i suppose its more popular due to years of watching big US fights announced as splitThe Kirkby Kid wrote:mickey1975 wrote:The MC was correct,a split decision is called a majority in BritainThe Kirkby Kid wrote:This was an extremely close fight and it genuinely could have gone either way. I was surprised that Smith was given the decision, especially as he was challenging and was fighting in Scotland. Still, really pleased that he won and that Liverpool has another champion.
One annoying thing though, MC Mark Burdis really needs to practice his delivery when it comes to announcing judges' decisions. I'm sure he said that it was a majority decision - it was a split decision!
Is this right? I am happy to stand corrected on this. I always thought that where two judges go for one fighter with the other going for the other that this should be announced as a split decision. The UK press seems to report it this way! I'll check out what Boxing News classify the result as in Thursday's issue! Boxrec.com certainly records the result as a Split Decision!
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
All these people saying Stephen was the home fighter, FW's fighter etc. Simpson is with Frank. Frank stayed silent throughout and Simpson had the home fighter's corner. John Simpson was the hometown fighter, the house fighter AND the champion.
The person saying that the look on my face said that I thought Stephen lost - Are you the new Dr Lightman now? Reading people's minds judged on their expressions? Anyone who has their younger brother in a massive fight like that and knowing the fight was pretty close would look a lot worse trust me. The fact I'm a fighter myself stops be crumbling. The nerves are worse when it's a sibling in there.
Stephen went to Glasgow, Simpson is a very good fighter, underdog, first 12 round fight, first title fight, first cut, first broken hand, first live fight(sort of top of the bill) and beat a very good kid in John Simpson.
All that matters is the result and the title. Don't forget Simpson and his team predicted they'd grind him down and stop Stephen. Saying he wouldn't be fit or strong or tough enough for John.
On the night I had Stephen winning by 2(7-5), watching it back I shared a round, gave 6 to Stephen and 5 to Simpson.
Simpson is a good lad, understandably gutted he lost and can win titles again - but that's boxing.
All the stuff about ripping a belt from a champion, hometown decision, house fighter decision means nothing.
Also I am never one to criticise TV but Jim Watt couldn't hide his disgust in the Englishman beating a Scotchman. Disgusting![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
The person saying that the look on my face said that I thought Stephen lost - Are you the new Dr Lightman now? Reading people's minds judged on their expressions? Anyone who has their younger brother in a massive fight like that and knowing the fight was pretty close would look a lot worse trust me. The fact I'm a fighter myself stops be crumbling. The nerves are worse when it's a sibling in there.
Stephen went to Glasgow, Simpson is a very good fighter, underdog, first 12 round fight, first title fight, first cut, first broken hand, first live fight(sort of top of the bill) and beat a very good kid in John Simpson.
All that matters is the result and the title. Don't forget Simpson and his team predicted they'd grind him down and stop Stephen. Saying he wouldn't be fit or strong or tough enough for John.
On the night I had Stephen winning by 2(7-5), watching it back I shared a round, gave 6 to Stephen and 5 to Simpson.
Simpson is a good lad, understandably gutted he lost and can win titles again - but that's boxing.
All the stuff about ripping a belt from a champion, hometown decision, house fighter decision means nothing.
Also I am never one to criticise TV but Jim Watt couldn't hide his disgust in the Englishman beating a Scotchman. Disgusting
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
the magnificent 7 then john murray or Derry undecided yetChris W 1982 wrote:Was nice meeting you mate.diggler wrote:was a great night, top atmosphere all the best
Whens ya next show?
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
Watt didn't say anything unfair as far as I can recall.Smigga wrote:Also I am never one to criticise TV but Jim Watt couldn't hide his disgust in the Englishman beating a Scotchman. Disgusting
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
I didn't say he said anything unfair. I said he didn't like the fact that an Englishman beat a Scot.Horse wrote:Watt didn't say anything unfair as far as I can recall.Smigga wrote:Also I am never one to criticise TV but Jim Watt couldn't hide his disgust in the Englishman beating a Scotchman. Disgusting
I don't really wish to go into it, but watch the fight again and listen to Watt's negativity toward Stephen.
Last edited by Smigga on 06 Sep 2010, 11:55, edited 1 time in total.
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
I think Johnny Nelson seemed more disgusted with the decision, although I don't rate Watt that highly, he scored the fight a draw and admitted neither fighter could complain at losingHorse wrote:Watt didn't say anything unfair as far as I can recall.Smigga wrote:Also I am never one to criticise TV but Jim Watt couldn't hide his disgust in the Englishman beating a Scotchman. Disgusting
Re: SIMPSON VS SMITH afterthoughts?
mickey1975 wrote:The MC was correct,a split decision is called a majority in BritainThe Kirkby Kid wrote:This was an extremely close fight and it genuinely could have gone either way. I was surprised that Smith was given the decision, especially as he was challenging and was fighting in Scotland. Still, really pleased that he won and that Liverpool has another champion.
One annoying thing though, MC Mark Burdis really needs to practice his delivery when it comes to announcing judges' decisions. I'm sure he said that it was a majority decision - it was a split decision!
No it's not. A majority is when one is a draw.