Can't ITV sort it out?
Froch Vs Abraham TV
Froch Vs Abraham TV
Has this been announced and I've missed it? Please don't tell me it's PrimeTime?
Can't ITV sort it out?
Can't ITV sort it out?
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
PrimeTime I reckon!MacTavish wrote:Has this been announced and I've missed it? Please don't tell me it's PrimeTime?
Can't ITV sort it out?
I'll be there though, Allah willing, not that that's much consolation to you, mind
-
Newport Daz
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 687
- Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Could have sworn that Sky were doing it, probably ppv. I'm sure I read how they had beaten Primetime to the fight. Maybe I dreamt it, or was drunk.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Think Sky wanted it at 11pm but Showtime insisted on 10pm - ridiculous really. So Sky pulled out and looks like its destined for primetime.
-
chrisfinch
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 334
- Joined: 17 Jan 2009, 14:20
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Showtime aren't showing the fight live, so that's a load of tosh. Unless you meant the german broadcasters, obviously.dbf wrote:Think Sky wanted it at 11pm but Showtime insisted on 10pm - ridiculous really. So Sky pulled out and looks like its destined for primetime.
But even so, I couldn't see sky not showing the fight because of that. They have re-jigged this weeks SFN to have the Wlad v Peter fight at 10, so no reason they couldn't have done that on October 2nd.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Surely it still can be arranged?chrisfinch wrote:Showtime aren't showing the fight live, so that's a load of tosh. Unless you meant the german broadcasters, obviously.dbf wrote:Think Sky wanted it at 11pm but Showtime insisted on 10pm - ridiculous really. So Sky pulled out and looks like its destined for primetime.![]()
But even so, I couldn't see sky not showing the fight because of that. They have re-jigged this weeks SFN to have the Wlad v Peter fight at 10, so no reason they couldn't have done that on October 2nd.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Im sure this will be on sky sports - but not ppv.leforge wrote:Surely it still can be arranged?chrisfinch wrote:Showtime aren't showing the fight live, so that's a load of tosh. Unless you meant the german broadcasters, obviously.dbf wrote:Think Sky wanted it at 11pm but Showtime insisted on 10pm - ridiculous really. So Sky pulled out and looks like its destined for primetime.![]()
But even so, I couldn't see sky not showing the fight because of that. They have re-jigged this weeks SFN to have the Wlad v Peter fight at 10, so no reason they couldn't have done that on October 2nd.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
boxrec schedule lists it as being on primetime...it's not gonna be for the WBC belt either, just a final eliminator.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Froch should be sky box office star by now!
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Sky dont pay feck all.
I know of an imminent show they paid 90k for and a previous ´big show´they paid nothing for.
FACT.
I know of an imminent show they paid 90k for and a previous ´big show´they paid nothing for.
FACT.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Tell David Haye or Ricky Hatton it does not pay!G0mez wrote:Sky dont pay feck all.
I know of an imminent show they paid 90k for and a previous ´big show´they paid nothing for.
FACT.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
leforge wrote:Froch should be sky box office star by now!
Who's Froch?
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
I have completely boycotted primetime - the coverage is rubbish, you have to pay a connection fee and then pay for the fights. All the fights that are on it are only worthy of sky sports (not the ppv). Im not getting skanked to watch people like tyson fury on ppv. If it was £2.99 a fight with no connection / subscription fee it would do far better.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Primetime better than nothing. How come he can't froch on sky?
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Froch and his promoter want ppv money or at least better money than normal sky sports offer but Froch isnt a big enough name for sky PPV.leforge wrote:Primetime better than nothing. How come he can't froch on sky?
What Froch fails to realise is that without people watching him on free to air or normal subscription sky sports, to build up his fanbase - he will never become a marquee name.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23119
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
But he is a long way past that stage of his career.He boxed on BBC,ITV and SKY earlier in his career.These Super Six fights should be his "pension" fights on SBO.He has suffered from poor promotion and rubbing a lot of people up the wrong way.Its fair to say,he is destined to never become a marquee namekingfinn wrote:Froch and his promoter want ppv money or at least better money than normal sky sports offer but Froch isnt a big enough name for sky PPV.leforge wrote:Primetime better than nothing. How come he can't froch on sky?
What Froch fails to realise is that without people watching him on free to air or normal subscription sky sports, to build up his fanbase - he will never become a marquee name.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Is hennessy to blame for this or tv companies?mickey1975 wrote:But he is a long way past that stage of his career.He boxed on BBC,ITV and SKY earlier in his career.These Super Six fights should be his "pension" fights on SBO.He has suffered from poor promotion and rubbing a lot of people up the wrong way.Its fair to say,he is destined to never become a marquee namekingfinn wrote:Froch and his promoter want ppv money or at least better money than normal sky sports offer but Froch isnt a big enough name for sky PPV.leforge wrote:Primetime better than nothing. How come he can't froch on sky?
What Froch fails to realise is that without people watching him on free to air or normal subscription sky sports, to build up his fanbase - he will never become a marquee name.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
leforge wrote:Is hennessy to blame for this or tv companies?mickey1975 wrote:But he is a long way past that stage of his career.He boxed on BBC,ITV and SKY earlier in his career.These Super Six fights should be his "pension" fights on SBO.He has suffered from poor promotion and rubbing a lot of people up the wrong way.Its fair to say,he is destined to never become a marquee namekingfinn wrote: Froch and his promoter want ppv money or at least better money than normal sky sports offer but Froch isnt a big enough name for sky PPV.
What Froch fails to realise is that without people watching him on free to air or normal subscription sky sports, to build up his fanbase - he will never become a marquee name.
if froch had defended his world title on british tv he would have become a big name, instead he came back to Britain and fought on showtime that most people dont know exists and the other people wont pay for - im not even sure who even buys these fights in the UK.
Hennessy is a shockingly bad promoter - he's done the same with Fury - waits for fans to start showing an interest in a fighter then shifts them to bloody primetime to dwindle into insignificance. No one is going to pay to watch fury its just stupid.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Be interesting to see the board news to see if Hennessy wins any bids.kingfinn wrote:leforge wrote:Is hennessy to blame for this or tv companies?mickey1975 wrote: But he is a long way past that stage of his career.He boxed on BBC,ITV and SKY earlier in his career.These Super Six fights should be his "pension" fights on SBO.He has suffered from poor promotion and rubbing a lot of people up the wrong way.Its fair to say,he is destined to never become a marquee name
if froch had defended his world title on british tv he would have become a big name, instead he came back to Britain and fought on showtime that most people dont know exists and the other people wont pay for - im not even sure who even buys these fights in the UK.
Hennessy is a shockingly bad promoter - he's done the same with Fury - waits for fans to start showing an interest in a fighter then shifts them to bloody primetime to dwindle into insignificance. No one is going to pay to watch fury its just stupid.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
I'm getting a bit mixed up here. Froch is on Prime Time right? The PPV channel that does the Super 6, a bit of MMA and nothing else.
Fury is due to be on Premier TV (subject of a recent HS press release and the channel that is showing Frampton and Mosley) - is this a new name for Primetime or is it a completely new channel? It seems bizarre to say the least that Hennessey has got deals with 2 different start up PPV companies for 2 of his fighters.
Fury is due to be on Premier TV (subject of a recent HS press release and the channel that is showing Frampton and Mosley) - is this a new name for Primetime or is it a completely new channel? It seems bizarre to say the least that Hennessey has got deals with 2 different start up PPV companies for 2 of his fighters.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Two different companies.earsjohn wrote:I'm getting a bit mixed up here. Froch is on Prime Time right? The PPV channel that does the Super 6, a bit of MMA and nothing else.
Fury is due to be on Premier TV (subject of a recent HS press release and the channel that is showing Frampton and Mosley) - is this a new name for Primetime or is it a completely new channel? It seems bizarre to say the least that Hennessey has got deals with 2 different start up PPV companies for 2 of his fighters.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
been announced on primetime mate! primetime might not be great but at least they doing it so im grateful!
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23119
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
Froch won his title in a FOTY against Pascal on ITV live.A rerun of his last gasp stoppage was shown on ITV,twice.ITV then showed a rerun of Direll.To access Primetime you needed Sky,with a phoneline connected and had to pay a connection fee for the first time you watched pushing the cost up to nearly £20.It had me scratching my head and getting severely pissed off and im a hardcore fan.how many casual fans this cost Froch,who knows?People are used to pressing one button on the Sky remote and thats it.Imagine how many come home from the pub and just impulse buy from SBO.This was virtually impossible with Primetime,even to those who knew it existed.Primetime was also unavailable on the Virgin platform,ruling out millions more.Carl has earned well soley down to Showtime.MH has had an exciting WBC champion in a groundbreaking tournament and seriously let him down.Oh,and if you did buy the excellent Kessler fight,you were paying almost literally for that fight,i have never known an undercard like it,with the possible exception of the Primetime Direll fight,and they looked like they had spent about £20 on production with Darren Barker refusing to commit because he has sparred both.Its seriously fecked up Carls profile and pocket.
Re: Froch Vs Abraham TV
The sad thing on the same night Foster jnr euro title challenge will be watched by more people.mickey1975 wrote:Froch won his title in a FOTY against Pascal on ITV live.A rerun of his last gasp stoppage was shown on ITV,twice.ITV then showed a rerun of Direll.To access Primetime you needed Sky,with a phoneline connected and had to pay a connection fee for the first time you watched pushing the cost up to nearly £20.It had me scratching my head and getting severely pissed off and im a hardcore fan.how many casual fans this cost Froch,who knows?People are used to pressing one button on the Sky remote and thats it.Imagine how many come home from the pub and just impulse buy from SBO.This was virtually impossible with Primetime,even to those who knew it existed.Primetime was also unavailable on the Virgin platform,ruling out millions more.Carl has earned well soley down to Showtime.MH has had an exciting WBC champion in a groundbreaking tournament and seriously let him down.Oh,and if you did buy the excellent Kessler fight,you were paying almost literally for that fight,i have never known an undercard like it,with the possible exception of the Primetime Direll fight,and they looked like they had spent about £20 on production with Darren Barker refusing to commit because he has sparred both.Its seriously fecked up Carls profile and pocket.