Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Who was Greater

Marciano
18
47%
Dempsey
20
53%
 
Total votes: 38

BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by BoxBuzz »

There is no "O" in Dempsey. nuff said.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by yancey »

I would take Dempsey in a hellacious fight.
Grimm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2231
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 22:22

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by Grimm »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:It's funny to me people are gonna pick Marciano to win.

You go down the list of attributes for each fighter, & Dempsey has the advantage in almost every category --- but people are gonna pick the other guy? :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: This is your opinion which I vehemently disagree. The only advantage Dempsey has is speed.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Now I know you're trolling. How about reach, Grimm? Is that my opinion, too? :lol:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by Crease »

I would also like to say not neither of these fighters were "hype jobs". Both men were devastating punchers!!!

There are not many people who would omit Dempsey and Marciano from their Heavyweight top 10s, and that in itself should tell you both of these guys were the real deal. :TU:
Grimm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2231
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 22:22

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by Grimm »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Now I know you're trolling. How about reach, Grimm? Is that my opinion, too? :lol:

Dempsey did not utilize his reach therefore it is not an advantage.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16762
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Dempsey all day long. Marciano was very good, but Dempsey was a different league.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by BoxBuzz »

Just in case I haven't been clear, I would bet on Dempsey and feel my money was fairly safe.

AND I think there is a good education process going on here. 7 years ago, this pole would have been 35 to 5 for Marciano.

I feel substantial progress has been made.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Grimm wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Now I know you're trolling. How about reach, Grimm? Is that my opinion, too? :lol:

Dempsey did not utilize his reach therefore it is not an advantage.
If you think Dempsey's, "only advantage" over Marciano is speed, you don't know the first thing about what is advantageous & what is not. Dempsey has it all over Marciano, & he'd have his gloves all over him in the ring, too.
Mr E
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 349
Joined: 08 Sep 2009, 16:54

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by Mr E »

I have a high opinion of Rocky but I pick the Mauler nevertheless.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Greatness poll Marciano vs Dempsey

Post by dempseyfire »

Grimm wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Now I know you're trolling. How about reach, Grimm? Is that my opinion, too? :lol:

Dempsey did not utilize his reach therefore it is not an advantage.
You don't have to be a stick and move artist for reach to matter . .
Post Reply