Jim Watt

Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Jim Watt

Post by Bricks »

Sorry could someone clarify, but is it Jim Watt who invented the superb british boxing phrase of such and such "fancies the job" more.

I recall it was a phrase Watt started and than others latched on to. Similar to Big Ron Atkinsons "he's scoring goals for fun".

Watt is a great analyst perhaps less so a blow by blow man, as he tends to whine, but I do wish he was able to be more critical instead of towing the Sky line these days. Not "Bunce level" critical just a little more critical.
Roars Like Me
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1763
Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Roars Like Me »

Nahh that's been floating round for years beforehand.. My Wife can't stand his voice and can always tell if he's commentating without even looking up. 'Is that the bloke that keeps saying 'puncheese' again?' :OhYes:
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Newport Daz »

Roars Like Me wrote:Nahh that's been floating round for years beforehand.. My Wife can't stand his voice and can always tell if he's commentating without even looking up. 'Is that the bloke that keeps saying 'puncheese' again?' :OhYes:

:lol: :lol: :lol: My wife says the exact same thing about the puncheeeese. :lol: :lol:
Smigga
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 07 Jan 2007, 11:50

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Smigga »

His new one for this season is "he's not making it hot enough for him(opponent)"
or "He needs to make it hotter in there"

Personally having never EVER slagged commentators off in my life, Watt needs a new job. He is the same old stuff week in week out and far too negative. Says the basics to build up a fight that a bookmaker with little boxing knowledge could say and constantly contradicts himself.

"I couldn't argue which ever way this fight goes, it's that close!"
Stephen Smith's hand is raised on a split decision against fellow Scot.
"Well I know I said I wouldn't argue.... BUT...."
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Jim Watt

Post by DavidPayne »

It needs consistency but we are overdue a little fresh blood both in the studio and on the ringside.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Jim Watt

Post by stujones »

There is still no one who comes close to Jim both in terms of articulation and reading of a fight.

Even though he had a classic bit of "spoke too soon" just before the Maccarinelli vs Frenkel KD/KO he was bang on. Frenkel was becoming increasingly less interested.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Jim Watt

Post by oliverfennell »

Yeah, nothing especially wrong with Watt on Saturday. Sure, he has his common "phrases" but if you think about it, pretty much everyone does when they're speaking.
lefty
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Jim Watt

Post by lefty »

Smigga wrote:His new one for this season is "he's not making it hot enough for him(opponent)"
or "He needs to make it hotter in there"

Personally having never EVER slagged commentators off in my life, Watt needs a new job. He is the same old stuff week in week out and far too negative. Says the basics to build up a fight that a bookmaker with little boxing knowledge could say and constantly contradicts himself.

"I couldn't argue which ever way this fight goes, it's that close!"
Stephen Smith's hand is raised on a split decision against fellow Scot.
"Well I know I said I wouldn't argue.... BUT...."
Personally i think he knows his stuff!Iain darke is more of a plank in my eyes!
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Bricks »

..
Last edited by Bricks on 27 Jan 2016, 23:58, edited 1 time in total.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Jim Watt

Post by DavidPayne »

There are so many possibles.

What about Wayne McCullough? or Billy Schwer?
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Newport Daz »

Enzo could be in the market for a new job too! I actually think he'd be pretty good too.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Jim Watt

Post by DavidPayne »

Well Celts appear to be the preferred ring-side accoutrement to the English grinder of Smith or Darke.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Counter-puncher »

whatever he says -- and i personally think he's ahd some very good nights as well as the odd stinker -- Watt's voice just works for me as part of a boxing broadcast.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Jim Watt

Post by stujones »

Counter-puncher wrote:whatever he says -- and i personally think he's ahd some very good nights as well as the odd stinker -- Watt's voice just works for me as part of a boxing broadcast.
That's what I agree with the most. From the outsider looking in, no one could imagine Jim Watt was actually one hard b*stard himself. So articulate and looks so well for his age.

I think Enzo could make a decent studio guest, but not sure he would have the voice or the vocabularly to do it as a round by round.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Jim Watt

Post by n1ebf »

I like Watt :box: great commentator.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Counter-puncher »

i may have said this before but- Watt's analysis on the Macklin - Moore fight was absolutely spot-on. he called macklin's tactics as dodgy from about 2 minutes in.

he does have his good nights.
MTG
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 23 Jan 2005, 14:09

Re: Jim Watt

Post by MTG »

jim is always on the ball and is clear spoken which can be hard for a man from his hometown(on tv)
Russ L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 114
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 05:29

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Russ L »

I love me some arrum punchies.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45235
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Jim Watt

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I love Watt. Always have done.

My personal favourite is "He needs tae putae-bitae-daevil in his wurruk!"
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Counter-puncher »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I love Watt. Always have done.

My personal favourite is "He needs tae putae-bitae-daevil in his wurruk!"
exactly what i was going to say. maybe 'spiiite' instead of devil.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Dioufy »

I can't stand the man when he commentates. I still have no clue how he thought Hatton won the 1st round against Branco. Branco nearly took his head off and Hatton was holding on for dear life. Plus many more awful scoring situations he's been in, make him 'unlistenable'.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Autobarn »

i like watt, especially with darke. mccrory always struck me as perfunctory and a bit repetitive though he has a laid back presence.

the whole sky broadcast team have gone downhill, about 2 years ago. obviously they're not allowed to let the viewer think they are watching something rubbish or questionable.

next to the irish commentators on RTE or the aussies on main event, who arse lick the most uninspiring matchups, hyperventilate over the most ordinary boxing and accept the most questionable of titles (thinking of the ozzies here with their IBO dannyweight champion of the world farces) - next to all this the british commentators are dry and harsh!

i'd like to see jamie moore back on sky a a pundit, and not just to talk about the guy who stopped him and basically ended his career (rhodes) which must have been uncomfortable though i thought he came across well.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13317
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Jim Watt

Post by MightyWarrior »

Jim Watt is a legend, we're lucky to have him. Maybe even a better commentator than he was a boxer.

Of course when you've been commentating for 20 years ( how many hours total ?? ) you're bound to repeat yourself a bit.

Just imagine if we have to put up with Jim Beam O'Nealy and Duke all the time.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Bricks »

The thing you have to say about Jim is, he is the epitomy of the elegant dignified retired former world champion. He has a certain presence. He never ever draws attention to his own career or mentions it unlike say a SRL.

Other guys Id like to see in the studio.

Steve Collins

Kevin Lueshing

and Adrian Dodson was always a good talker, perhaps one of the finest.
Smigga
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 07 Jan 2007, 11:50

Re: Jim Watt

Post by Smigga »

mugabi wrote:The thing you have to say about Jim is, he is the epitomy of the elegant dignified retired former world champion. He has a certain presence. He never ever draws attention to his own career or mentions it unlike say a SRL.

Other guys Id like to see in the studio.

Steve Collins

Kevin Lueshing

and Adrian Dodson was always a good talker, perhaps one of the finest.
Spend 5 minutes in SRL's company and you end up almost begging for more stories on his career! It's one of the best careers in boxing history and he was one of THE best.
I'd have Pelé commentating and referring to himself any day - He was THE best.

SRL has an aura about him, a real glowing presence. To the point of being weird.
Post Reply