dberry wrote:Deserter wrote:I think the list is smaller than that Oliver, as in the case of Lewis-Holyfield and Calzaghe-Hopkins, it was the Brits who were considered the world number one at the time, not their opponents.
If I was being really pedantic, Pedroza was also on the slide and Nelson was probably regarded as the world's best at that weight at the time.
Pfffft, Calzaghe has never been regarded as the world no. 1, let alone at light heavy where he fought Hopkins at.
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
At super middle, yeah, it took him a few years to establish his position, and he did so through longevity more than opposition, but who would you have ranked over him once he got there? Ottke? He was just as guilty of poor matchmaking as Joe.
And at light heavy? Well, if beating the division number one doesn't make you the division number one, then what does?
You can justifiably criticise a lot about Calzaghe's career, but to say he was NEVER regarded as no. 1 at either weight is just nonsense.