Michael Spinks V Michael Moorer

[Roco]

At light heavy and heavy, how does this go?

[Goodnight, Irene]

A pair of decisions. One to Spinks at Light-Heavy, the other, to Moorer at Heavy.

[Roco]

According to some Moorer was a wrecking machine at light heavy. Is a KO win at light heavy inconceivable?

[McCannW14]

Spinks wins both by decision.

Too cute and awkward for Moorer, who wouldnt intinidate him like Tyson did.

Plus, Spinks punches hard enough with the right to hurt Moorer. Best punch against a southpaw.

[Ambling Alp]

Interesting matchup.
At 175, Moorer did not fight anywhere near the competition that Spinks did. We really don't know how good Moorer was at light heavy. I would have to go with Spinks as well.

At heavyweight it would be an interesting fight. Moorer did have good boxing skills and could hit. However he was lazy at times. Moorer had a bit more power at this weight, but Spinks had the better chin. They both could hurt each other, but would have trouble putting the other guy away. I think Spinks wins on points or wears him down and wins by a late round stoppage.

[Robinson]

I think at LHW this would be excellent !

AT HW it would be entertaining, but it
really would be a cool and drool worthy affair
at 175lbs.

[King Carlos]

Spinks at either, though it would be more competitive at Heavyweight. That one may end in a decision, even. At Lt. Heavyweight the two were leagues apart.