Classic American West Coast Boxing

Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

Panzerfaust wrote:Often when i do the mitt workouts i try to make ''real'' boxing situations moving round the ring and having the fighters throw combinations against a moving target so to speak. also i train alot of slipping under the jab with the straight right hand etc wich makes it difficult to get the mitt in place for that right hand so the body piece comes in handy(makes me sorta a moving heavy bag) . Ill have the soft spots highlighted on it, liver,solar plexus and the heart.

i got one allready ,but its 20-30 yo and starting to get quite worn out so its hurts like hell after a session of body punching :lol:

I think it works out well makes it easier to get fluidity in the session and more realism to the upstairs-downstairs work. :box:

Remy, I also teach hitting the body under the jab and thats a hard one to position my hand for. I have to bend my right hand too far back to expose the targer. I'll let them tag the back of my hand pressed against my body but that equates to me taking some of the shot. My body is still hard but I don't need to take punches from anybody these days. I'll likely try body piece and retrain my timing to accomodate the addition. Like anything else, just a little practice and the timing will be there. Like you, I like to move around like a fight, I use the whole ring when I work the pads
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by raylawpc »

Panzerfaust wrote:I got a question for you guys, what are your thoughts on stance? I tend to favour the slightly leaning over to the right rather than the centered more square stance that is common now a days. any thoughts?
As a general rule, I prefer a balanced straight-up boxing stance, feet comfortably apart with the weight on the balls of the feet and about the same amount of weight on each foot. One should feel balanced and able to move easily.
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

raylawpc wrote:
Panzerfaust wrote:I got a question for you guys, what are your thoughts on stance? I tend to favour the slightly leaning over to the right rather than the centered more square stance that is common now a days. any thoughts?
As a general rule, I prefer a balanced straight-up boxing stance, feet comfortably apart with the weight on the balls of the feet and about the same amount of weight on each foot. One should feel balanced and able to move easily.
A Jackie McCoy trick & Dempsey . . .

Tom, I pretty much balanced things between both legs. But Mando Ramos taught me something years after both our careers were over.
Jackie McCoy had his boxers, who were all major league punchers, put a little more weight on the back foot.
They could still throw punishing jabs, but when they thru rights, they'd shift the weight from the back foot to the front.
This puts the weight of the whole body into the punch.

When I teach today, I teach what Jackie taught. I tried it out, it put more power in my punches.

Jack Dempsey would use what he called a "Falling Step", to put his weight into a punch.
He'd throw a right with out moving his left leg forward until the last second. If he didn't step forward, he'd fall on his face.
His body would instinctivly move the left leg out before he fell, with all that forward momentem behind the punch.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by bennie »

Image


Billy Papke squares up to Stanley Ketchel, with the Boilermaker looking on.
THEHAMMER321
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 945
Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 05:55

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by THEHAMMER321 »

HI guys I am glad to be back, took a job driving a truck for the last couple of months was on the road most of the time, I was taking someones place who was hospitalized, gladly it was temporary so I am back home, have a lot of catching up to do on here. :bag: :TU:
kikibalt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13128
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 18:39

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by kikibalt »

THEHAMMER321 wrote:HI guys I am glad to be back, took a job driving a truck for the last couple of months was on the road most of the time, I was taking someones place who was hospitalized, gladly it was temporary so I am back home, have a lot of catching up to do on here. :bag: :TU:
Miss you dude.....Glad to see you back :TU:
THEHAMMER321
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 945
Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 05:55

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by THEHAMMER321 »

thanks for the welcome back we got a lot of catching up to do. :TU: :TU:
THEHAMMER321
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 945
Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 05:55

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by THEHAMMER321 »

Frank how have you and your family been, especially your daughter hope she is doing well. :bow:
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by raylawpc »

Rick Farris wrote:
raylawpc wrote:
Panzerfaust wrote:I got a question for you guys, what are your thoughts on stance? I tend to favour the slightly leaning over to the right rather than the centered more square stance that is common now a days. any thoughts?
As a general rule, I prefer a balanced straight-up boxing stance, feet comfortably apart with the weight on the balls of the feet and about the same amount of weight on each foot. One should feel balanced and able to move easily.
A Jackie McCoy trick & Dempsey . . .

Tom, I pretty much balanced things between both legs. But Mando Ramos taught me something years after both our careers were over.
Jackie McCoy had his boxers, who were all major league punchers, put a little more weight on the back foot.
They could still throw punishing jabs, but when they thru rights, they'd shift the weight from the back foot to the front.
This puts the weight of the whole body into the punch.

When I teach today, I teach what Jackie taught. I tried it out, it put more power in my punches.

Jack Dempsey would use what he called a "Falling Step", to put his weight into a punch.
He'd throw a right with out moving his left leg forward until the last second. If he didn't step forward, he'd fall on his face.
His body would instinctivly move the left leg out before he fell, with all that forward momentem behind the punch.
McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

My Brazilian wife says, "only in Brazil" . . .
--------------------------------------------


No joke! Illiterate clown triumphs in election
'
What does a congressman do? The truth is I don't know, but vote for me and I'll tell you'.
.Brazilian clown Tiririca caught the attention of disillusioned voters by asking for their support with the humorous slogan: "It can't get any worse.


SAO PAULO — Voters the world over complain about having clowns for politicians, but Brazilians embraced the idea on Sunday by sending a real one to Congress with more votes than any other candidate.

Francisco Everardo Oliveira Silva, better known by his clown name Tiririca, received more than 1.3 million votes in Sao Paulo state in Brazil's presidential and congressional elections. That was more than double the votes of the second-placed candidate in Brazil's most populous state.

Related content Brazil's Rousseff forced into runoff vote
Former revolutionary set to be Brazil's next president?
..Tiririca caught the attention of disillusioned voters by asking for their support with the humorous slogan: "It can't get any worse" and a promise to do nothing more in Congress than report back to them on how politicians spend their time.

"What does a congressman do? The truth is I don't know, but vote for me and I'll tell you," the 45-year-old said in his campaign advertisements.

The clown, whose stage name means "grumpy," usually appears in public wearing a blond wig, a red hat and a garish outfit. He survived a last-minute attempt by public prosecutors to bar him from running because of evidence that he is illiterate.

His candidacy may not have been as spontaneous or innocent as it might appear.

Tiririca's well-financed campaign will help elect other politicians because under Brazil's election rules he can pass his substantial excess votes on to other candidates in his coalition, which includes the ruling Workers' Party.

------------------------------------------------
To keep this on boxing topic, former bantam champ, Eder Jofre, is the mayor of Sao Paolo, Brazil
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

THEHAMMER321 wrote:HI guys I am glad to be back, took a job driving a truck for the last couple of months was on the road most of the time, I was taking someones place who was hospitalized, gladly it was temporary so I am back home, have a lot of catching up to do on here. :bag: :TU:

Glad you back, Paul!
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

raylawpc wrote:
Rick Farris wrote:
raylawpc wrote: As a general rule, I prefer a balanced straight-up boxing stance, feet comfortably apart with the weight on the balls of the feet and about the same amount of weight on each foot. One should feel balanced and able to move easily.
A Jackie McCoy trick & Dempsey . . .

Tom, I pretty much balanced things between both legs. But Mando Ramos taught me something years after both our careers were over.
Jackie McCoy had his boxers, who were all major league punchers, put a little more weight on the back foot.
They could still throw punishing jabs, but when they thru rights, they'd shift the weight from the back foot to the front.
This puts the weight of the whole body into the punch.

When I teach today, I teach what Jackie taught. I tried it out, it put more power in my punches.

Jack Dempsey would use what he called a "Falling Step", to put his weight into a punch.
He'd throw a right with out moving his left leg forward until the last second. If he didn't step forward, he'd fall on his face.
His body would instinctivly move the left leg out before he fell, with all that forward momentem behind the punch.
McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
Since we are talking "old school", here's something from 1928, written by the great Grantland Rice:



THE SPORT LIGHT by Grantland Rice
[1928.]

Walter Monahan on Punching.

Sometime ago Gene Tunney offered the suggestion that few present day boxers knew anything about the science of hard punching. Walter Monahan backs him up. Monahan trained, or tried to train, Willard for the Dempsey slaughter but no one could make Willard take that scuffle seriously until Dempsey hit him. Monahan later on worked Tunney Tony at Miami Beach with the light and heavy bag and now, with training schools at South Hampton and Newport, Monahan has all about all the trade he can handle in teaching the young or old idea how to thump.

"Few fighters," says Monahan, "know anything at all about getting their weight back of a punch or using the right snap. They cuff or slap or jab but it doesn't mean anything. They know little about scientific hitting, and there is just as much science in hitting as there is in boxing. They might have studied Dempsey. He never was a boxer, but when it came to backing up a punch he pivoted like a golfer. He would come up on one toe and throw his entire right or left side into the wallop."

"Should the shoulder and body travel with the punch or swing in back of it?" I asked Monahan.

"The body should swing in back of the punch just before the moment of impact. There is a shoulder and body snap as well as a wrist snap. No one who uses only his hands and arms without any shoulder or body support can ever amount to anything as a hitter. And it is surprising how few of the best-known boxers know anything at all about the main features that are responsible for punishing blows. In my opinion, Monte Munn is naturally one of the hardest punchers I ever saw, but he needed more boxing schooling and experience to use this power."

Punching and Gameness.

"Dempsey," I suggested, was always willing to throw a punch without any particular thought of self- protection."

"It takes a game fellow to be a hard puncher," Monahan added. "Few understand how punching and gameness go together. If a man isn't the dead game he is thinking more along defensive lines than attacking lines. He is thinking more about protecting himself than about hurting the other fellow. Nobody can think in two directions at the same time. When Dempsey saw an opening he left one fly with all he had, leaving himself wide open when he missed. But he didn't miss so often when he was younger and faster.

"I worked a lot with Gene Tunney." Monahan continued, "and while he isn't a knock-out puncher he knows how to punch, how to use his weight and he hurt you a lot more than any spectator might think. I'd call Tunney a smart hitter because he can jar you and jolt you without taking the chances Dempsey took. Tunney could be at slugger if he ever wanted to let himself go, regardless of the defensive side. There are a lot of fighters willing to take a chance but they don't know how. They are like a 200 pounder slicing a golf ball about 150 yards into the rough."
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

Tom wrote:

McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom, one day at the Johnny Flores Gym (I was an amateur) Joe Ponce, Bobby Chacon's trainer, worked with me on footing and balance, weight distribution behind punching. He had me doing a "rocking" movement with the weight evenly distributed between both legs, but shifting the weight between both as you punched. It's kind of hard for me to put in words, but it worked best for me. Another local trainer who worked with Canto Robledo, named Eddie Johnson, also showed me something similar.
Panzerfaust
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 17:13

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Panzerfaust »

raylawpc wrote:
Rick Farris wrote:
raylawpc wrote: As a general rule, I prefer a balanced straight-up boxing stance, feet comfortably apart with the weight on the balls of the feet and about the same amount of weight on each foot. One should feel balanced and able to move easily.
A Jackie McCoy trick & Dempsey . . .

Tom, I pretty much balanced things between both legs. But Mando Ramos taught me something years after both our careers were over.
Jackie McCoy had his boxers, who were all major league punchers, put a little more weight on the back foot.
They could still throw punishing jabs, but when they thru rights, they'd shift the weight from the back foot to the front.
This puts the weight of the whole body into the punch.

When I teach today, I teach what Jackie taught. I tried it out, it put more power in my punches.

Jack Dempsey would use what he called a "Falling Step", to put his weight into a punch.
He'd throw a right with out moving his left leg forward until the last second. If he didn't step forward, he'd fall on his face.
His body would instinctivly move the left leg out before he fell, with all that forward momentem behind the punch.
McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
i usually take the fighters psycholoogical dispostiotion and his physical into consideration
and theres definatly a slight tradeoff, I teach a 40-60 split of the weight. personaly i prefer to lean back on it and to the right a bit.
Im very interested in Franks oppinion here as was mentioned has trained word level fighters(hint hint Frank :D )

I got alot of old boxing manuals in pdf format found alot of interesting things in them
Panzerfaust
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 17:13

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Panzerfaust »

Rick Farris wrote:My Brazilian wife says, "only in Brazil" . . .
--------------------------------------------


No joke! Illiterate clown triumphs in election
'
What does a congressman do? The truth is I don't know, but vote for me and I'll tell you'.
.Brazilian clown Tiririca caught the attention of disillusioned voters by asking for their support with the humorous slogan: "It can't get any worse.


SAO PAULO — Voters the world over complain about having clowns for politicians, but Brazilians embraced the idea on Sunday by sending a real one to Congress with more votes than any other candidate.

Francisco Everardo Oliveira Silva, better known by his clown name Tiririca, received more than 1.3 million votes in Sao Paulo state in Brazil's presidential and congressional elections. That was more than double the votes of the second-placed candidate in Brazil's most populous state.

Related content Brazil's Rousseff forced into runoff vote
Former revolutionary set to be Brazil's next president?
..Tiririca caught the attention of disillusioned voters by asking for their support with the humorous slogan: "It can't get any worse" and a promise to do nothing more in Congress than report back to them on how politicians spend their time.

"What does a congressman do? The truth is I don't know, but vote for me and I'll tell you," the 45-year-old said in his campaign advertisements.

The clown, whose stage name means "grumpy," usually appears in public wearing a blond wig, a red hat and a garish outfit. He survived a last-minute attempt by public prosecutors to bar him from running because of evidence that he is illiterate.

His candidacy may not have been as spontaneous or innocent as it might appear.

Tiririca's well-financed campaign will help elect other politicians because under Brazil's election rules he can pass his substantial excess votes on to other candidates in his coalition, which includes the ruling Workers' Party.

------------------------------------------------
To keep this on boxing topic, former bantam champ, Eder Jofre, is the mayor of Sao Paolo, Brazil
:lol: :lol:
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by raylawpc »

Panzerfaust wrote:
raylawpc wrote:
Rick Farris wrote: A Jackie McCoy trick & Dempsey . . .

Tom, I pretty much balanced things between both legs. But Mando Ramos taught me something years after both our careers were over.
Jackie McCoy had his boxers, who were all major league punchers, put a little more weight on the back foot.
They could still throw punishing jabs, but when they thru rights, they'd shift the weight from the back foot to the front.
This puts the weight of the whole body into the punch.

When I teach today, I teach what Jackie taught. I tried it out, it put more power in my punches.

Jack Dempsey would use what he called a "Falling Step", to put his weight into a punch.
He'd throw a right with out moving his left leg forward until the last second. If he didn't step forward, he'd fall on his face.
His body would instinctivly move the left leg out before he fell, with all that forward momentem behind the punch.
McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
i usually take the fighters psycholoogical dispostiotion and his physical into consideration
and theres definatly a slight tradeoff, I teach a 40-60 split of the weight. personaly i prefer to lean back on it and to the right a bit.
Im very interested in Franks oppinion here as was mentioned has trained word level fighters(hint hint Frank :D )

I got alot of old boxing manuals in pdf format found alot of interesting things in them
I recall visiting with an old timer who personally knew Charlie Goldman. Charlie, of course, trained Rocky Marciano and four other world champions, and was probably one of the top five trainers of all time. Charlie believed that a fighter should feel “comfortable” with whatever style or technique he used. “Comfortable” was a favorite word of Charlie’s. Every time he taught a boxer something new, he would ask several times, “Does that feel comfortable?”

Charlie believed that God gave every man an inherent boxing style, and it was the job of the trainer to discover it. When he asked a fighter if the fighter was comfortable, and the fighter said “no” or “that doesn’t feel right,” then Charlie would help him adapt what Charlie taught until it felt comfortable to the fighter. As long as the technique was not fundamentally flawed, Charlie would work with the fighter’s natural style and improve upon it, not make him change it.

If Charlie were alive today and on this list, he probably would have answered: “What stance makes the fighter feel comfortable?”

Interestingly, Charlie did not believe in headgear, and thought it ruined the ability to fight inside and avoid accidental head butts. He said that, in his day, they didn’t have headgear, and so one learned real quickly in the gym how to avoid head butts. The advent of headgear in training meant a fighter only had to worry about head butts in an actual fight, and therefore was lazy about avoiding them in the gym. As a result, modern fighters don’t know how to avoid collisions of the head because they don’t have to practice it in the gym. But Charlie was realistic enough to understand the cost of a cut in training, so his fighters always used head gear. Yet, he felt head gear had forever ruined one aspect of the game.
Panzerfaust
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 560
Joined: 18 Dec 2009, 17:13

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Panzerfaust »

raylawpc wrote:
Panzerfaust wrote:
raylawpc wrote: McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
i usually take the fighters psycholoogical dispostiotion and his physical into consideration
and theres definatly a slight tradeoff, I teach a 40-60 split of the weight. personaly i prefer to lean back on it and to the right a bit.
Im very interested in Franks oppinion here as was mentioned has trained word level fighters(hint hint Frank :D )

I got alot of old boxing manuals in pdf format found alot of interesting things in them
I recall visiting with an old timer who personally knew Charlie Goldman. Charlie, of course, trained Rocky Marciano and four other world champions, and was probably one of the top five trainers of all time. Charlie believed that a fighter should feel “comfortable” with whatever style or technique he used. “Comfortable” was a favorite word of Charlie’s. Every time he taught a boxer something new, he would ask several times, “Does that feel comfortable?”

Charlie believed that God gave every man an inherent boxing style, and it was the job of the trainer to discover it. When he asked a fighter if the fighter was comfortable, and the fighter said “no” or “that doesn’t feel right,” then Charlie would help him adapt what Charlie taught until it felt comfortable to the fighter. As long as the technique was not fundamentally flawed, Charlie would work with the fighter’s natural style and improve upon it, not make him change it.

If Charlie were alive today and on this list, he probably would have answered: “What stance makes the fighter feel comfortable?”

Interestingly, Charlie did not believe in headgear, and thought it ruined the ability to fight inside and avoid accidental head butts. He said that, in his day, they didn’t have headgear, and so one learned real quickly in the gym how to avoid head butts. The advent of headgear in training meant a fighter only had to worry about head butts in an actual fight, and therefore was lazy about avoiding them in the gym. As a result, modern fighters don’t know how to avoid collisions of the head because they don’t have to practice it in the gym. But Charlie was realistic enough to understand the cost of a cut in training, so his fighters always used head gear. Yet, he felt head gear had forever ruined one aspect of the game.
A gem right there Tom :TU: ill keep that in mind.
I read somewherre that they would slightly turn their head to the right while leading with the jab so that in the case of a headbutt they would catch it on thwe side of the head and not round the eyes.hence the cauliflower left ears. This is not something i have seen though so i dont know about the autenticity
kikibalt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13128
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 18:39

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by kikibalt »

Panzerfaust wrote:
raylawpc wrote:
Rick Farris wrote: A Jackie McCoy trick & Dempsey . . .

Tom, I pretty much balanced things between both legs. But Mando Ramos taught me something years after both our careers were over.
Jackie McCoy had his boxers, who were all major league punchers, put a little more weight on the back foot.
They could still throw punishing jabs, but when they thru rights, they'd shift the weight from the back foot to the front.
This puts the weight of the whole body into the punch.

When I teach today, I teach what Jackie taught. I tried it out, it put more power in my punches.

Jack Dempsey would use what he called a "Falling Step", to put his weight into a punch.
He'd throw a right with out moving his left leg forward until the last second. If he didn't step forward, he'd fall on his face.
His body would instinctivly move the left leg out before he fell, with all that forward momentem behind the punch.
McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
i usually take the fighters psycholoogical dispostiotion and his physical into consideration
and theres definatly a slight tradeoff, I teach a 40-60 split of the weight. personaly i prefer to lean back on it and to the right a bit.
Im very interested in Franks oppinion here as was mentioned has trained word level fighters(hint hint Frank :D )

I got alot of old boxing manuals in pdf format found alot of interesting things in them
Psychological make up? what if they are crazy?... :lol:

That's all I am saying on this.... :OhYes:
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

Psychological make up? what if they are crazy?...

That's all I am saying on this....

-----------------------------------------------------------
:lol: :lol:
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by bennie »

raylawpc wrote:
Panzerfaust wrote:
raylawpc wrote: McCoy had a "back-to-the-future" approach. Fighters from Jeffries era kept their weight on the back foot too (although these old-timers were more radical about it. Look at photos of Fitz, Johnson, etc. and you can see how they shifted their weight to the back foot.). That changed during the Dempsey era. My personal opinion is that keeping the weight distributed evenly allows better foot movement, so perhaps there is a trade-off.
i usually take the fighters psycholoogical dispostiotion and his physical into consideration
and theres definatly a slight tradeoff, I teach a 40-60 split of the weight. personaly i prefer to lean back on it and to the right a bit.
Im very interested in Franks oppinion here as was mentioned has trained word level fighters(hint hint Frank :D )

I got alot of old boxing manuals in pdf format found alot of interesting things in them
I recall visiting with an old timer who personally knew Charlie Goldman. Charlie, of course, trained Rocky Marciano and four other world champions, and was probably one of the top five trainers of all time. Charlie believed that a fighter should feel “comfortable” with whatever style or technique he used. “Comfortable” was a favorite word of Charlie’s. Every time he taught a boxer something new, he would ask several times, “Does that feel comfortable?”

Charlie believed that God gave every man an inherent boxing style, and it was the job of the trainer to discover it. When he asked a fighter if the fighter was comfortable, and the fighter said “no” or “that doesn’t feel right,” then Charlie would help him adapt what Charlie taught until it felt comfortable to the fighter. As long as the technique was not fundamentally flawed, Charlie would work with the fighter’s natural style and improve upon it, not make him change it.

If Charlie were alive today and on this list, he probably would have answered: “What stance makes the fighter feel comfortable?”

Interestingly, Charlie did not believe in headgear, and thought it ruined the ability to fight inside and avoid accidental head butts. He said that, in his day, they didn’t have headgear, and so one learnedreal quickly in the gym how to avoid head butts. The advent of headgear in training meant a fighter only had to worry about head butts in an actual fight, and therefore was lazy about avoiding them in the gym. As a result, modern fighters don’t know how to avoid collisions of the head because they don’t have to practice it in the gym. But Charlie was realistic enough to understand the cost of a cut in training, so his fighters always used head gear. Yet, he felt head gear had forever ruined one aspect of the game.

Great post, Tom.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by bennie »

Image


Les Darcy
kikibalt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13128
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 18:39

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by kikibalt »

In the early '50's a friend of mine, Johnny, got busted with a roach, he went to court and he was ofter a deal, six months in county jail, Johnny asked for time to think it over, judge said okay, he gave Johnny two weeks to think it over.
Johnny's mom wanted Johnny to go see Junana La Loca. Junana La Loca was what we now call a community activist, in other words she knew everybody's business.
Johnny said okay; he would go talk to La Loca. Johnny told Juana what the deal was.
"Don't worry Johnny, I'll go talk to the judge for you, I'll get him to give you a better deal, maybe thirty days, no more then that"
Johnny and Juana La Loca go to court, Juana told the judge that she was there to talk for Johnny, judge told Juana to go ahead and talk.
Juana La Loca talked and talked and talked, when she was done the judge told Johnny to stand up as he was ready to pass sentence, he gave Johnny nine months!
Rick Farris
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7200
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by Rick Farris »

kikibalt wrote:In the early '50's a friend of mine, Johnny, got busted with a roach, he went to court and he was ofter a deal, six months in county jail, Johnny asked for time to think it over, judge said okay, he gave Johnny two weeks to think it over.
Johnny's mom wanted Johnny to go see Junana La Loca. Junana La Loca was what we now call a community activist, in other words she knew everybody's business.
Johnny said okay; he would go talk to La Loca. Johnny told Juana what the deal was.
"Don't worry Johnny, I'll go talk to the judge for you, I'll get him to give you a better deal, maybe thirty days, no more then that"
Johnny and Juana La Loca go to court, Juana told the judge that she was there to talk for Johnny, judge told Juana to go ahead and talk.
Juana La Loca talked and talked and talked, when she was done the judge told Johnny to stand up as he was ready to pass sentence, he gave Johnny nine months!
:lol:
kikibalt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13128
Joined: 24 Oct 2005, 18:39

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by kikibalt »

Rick Farris wrote:
kikibalt wrote:In the early '50's a friend of mine, Johnny, got busted with a roach, he went to court and he was ofter a deal, six months in county jail, Johnny asked for time to think it over, judge said okay, he gave Johnny two weeks to think it over.
Johnny's mom wanted Johnny to go see Junana La Loca. Junana La Loca was what we now call a community activist, in other words she knew everybody's business.
Johnny said okay; he would go talk to La Loca. Johnny told Juana what the deal was.
"Don't worry Johnny, I'll go talk to the judge for you, I'll get him to give you a better deal, maybe thirty days, no more then that"
Johnny and Juana La Loca go to court, Juana told the judge that she was there to talk for Johnny, judge told Juana to go ahead and talk.
Juana La Loca talked and talked and talked, when she was done the judge told Johnny to stand up as he was ready to pass sentence, he gave Johnny nine months!
:lol:
True story... :lol:
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing

Post by raylawpc »

bennie wrote:
raylawpc wrote:
Panzerfaust wrote: i usually take the fighters psycholoogical dispostiotion and his physical into consideration
and theres definatly a slight tradeoff, I teach a 40-60 split of the weight. personaly i prefer to lean back on it and to the right a bit.
Im very interested in Franks oppinion here as was mentioned has trained word level fighters(hint hint Frank :D )

I got alot of old boxing manuals in pdf format found alot of interesting things in them
I recall visiting with an old timer who personally knew Charlie Goldman. Charlie, of course, trained Rocky Marciano and four other world champions, and was probably one of the top five trainers of all time. Charlie believed that a fighter should feel “comfortable” with whatever style or technique he used. “Comfortable” was a favorite word of Charlie’s. Every time he taught a boxer something new, he would ask several times, “Does that feel comfortable?”

Charlie believed that God gave every man an inherent boxing style, and it was the job of the trainer to discover it. When he asked a fighter if the fighter was comfortable, and the fighter said “no” or “that doesn’t feel right,” then Charlie would help him adapt what Charlie taught until it felt comfortable to the fighter. As long as the technique was not fundamentally flawed, Charlie would work with the fighter’s natural style and improve upon it, not make him change it.

If Charlie were alive today and on this list, he probably would have answered: “What stance makes the fighter feel comfortable?”

Interestingly, Charlie did not believe in headgear, and thought it ruined the ability to fight inside and avoid accidental head butts. He said that, in his day, they didn’t have headgear, and so one learnedreal quickly in the gym how to avoid head butts. The advent of headgear in training meant a fighter only had to worry about head butts in an actual fight, and therefore was lazy about avoiding them in the gym. As a result, modern fighters don’t know how to avoid collisions of the head because they don’t have to practice it in the gym. But Charlie was realistic enough to understand the cost of a cut in training, so his fighters always used head gear. Yet, he felt head gear had forever ruined one aspect of the game.

Great post, Tom.
Thanks bennie.
Post Reply