Deserter wrote:Captain Hook wrote:You seem to have started a thread aimed at the Khan haters....
"Khan claims he's a big puncher"
Why not start one with a little praise for a British world champion? Then again, that would never happen on Boxrec these days......instead let's pick on the things we can criticise him for.
PS I'm an army of one who doesn't jump on the bandwagon after a fight.
People on here gave Earl a shot at beating Khan, so what of them? I am one of those who thought Khan would beat him easily, but still....
Fella, you seem to be just rambling now after your previous assertions were dealt with.
Right, so now my crime is not that I'm a Khan hater, but rather that I'm posting a negative comment about him that is acting as 'fuel' for the haters. This is a fascinating approach coming from a journalist - you're basically saying I should be posting positive comments rather than pulling someone up on making inflated claims... I can see your editor having the same approach when it comes to news-gathering - 'No, let's not do anything on the local MP claiming something that the evidence doesn't support, let's instead focus on stories of how he's doing good things for the local community'.
And you keep on rambling on about people's opinions pre-fight regarding Khan and Earl - why can't you grasp that it's utterly irrelevant to what we're talking about? You asserted that Khan's blow-out of Earl was evidence of his power, pretty much everyone else has said it's not a good example as Earl was clearly a shell of his former self. End of.
You are looking way to much into this and seem to have way too much time on your hands.
Every post you've made in response to mine has been your take on what I'm thinking, rather than sitting down and reading it in black and white!
When have I rambled? I made my points, you don't seem to be able to grasp that I disagree with you and what has my profession got to do with it? If you want to call me and speak to me about my journalistic integrity feel free, you know nothing about me. All I asked for was a little balance and I never accused you of anything.
This isn't about you, it's about Amir Khan.
All I said is that Khan flattened Earl and I didn't believe Earl was "shot" at the time. I know damage had been done but "shot" is a very strong term.
I've not made Khan out to be some monster puncher because I don't believe he is so wind your neck in and move on to someone else rather than trying to second guess me when you still seem puzzled by my initial comments.
And I never described you as a "hater"...or said you were guilty of "a crime"......calm down dear, you're one of the posters I usually agree with :)
You and I disagree. I take your points on board and respect your opinion, so kindly respect mine.
Ta ta.....