Haye Undercard

leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Haye Undercard

Post by leforge »

Annouced on ringside:

Sexton V Edwards Commonwealth Flyweight
Hall V Davis British Bantamweight


What do people think of these being main support fights?
jlh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 307
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 13:13

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by jlh »

Largely will depend on if these are the main support. They are ok Friday night fights but certainly not PPV bouts. Knowing Haye though, these will probably be on the PPV card.
Really shows how good Warren is these days compared to Haye or maybe how crap Haye is to Warren.
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by neil hibbert »

both good evenly matched bouts, something i would sooner see than and big name having an easy fight
idle talk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 246
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 11:56

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by idle talk »

Same here!! Both exciting fights! Is that Paul Edwards or chris Edwards tho?
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by J »

sexton has just fought plus he will have to shift some weight to make flyweight. :OhYes: :lol:
sendo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 17:30

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by sendo »

jlh wrote:Largely will depend on if these are the main support. They are ok Friday night fights but certainly not PPV bouts. Knowing Haye though, these will probably be on the PPV card.
Really shows how good Warren is these days compared to Haye or maybe how crap Haye is to Warren.
No it shows how under pressure Allegedly is to deliver better quality bills after years of taking the piss.
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by neil hibbert »

chris edwards :TU:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by orbtastic »

answered my earlier question I deleted, ta
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by reggaereggae »

what a discticly average underacrd. They really should've moved Groves to the bill
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by Autobarn »

not a great undercard.

we should have expected much better.

after FW's mag 7 bill, where almost all the fights were interesting or impressive, you would have hoped for haye to do something a bit better.

remember the fights hayemaker put on, lindsay v appleby, quigley v dodson? paying viewers should be getting something like that, as the taster to such a big event.

that said, haye won't care, as he's making so much more money than any of them for a very easy, very high profile contest.

haye's not the only one - its not the first uninspiring PPV undercard and standards have slipped, however.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by 15829 »

looking forward to the hall v davies fight
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by neil hibbert »

i dont see the problem with the 2 undercard fights announced so far, both really good exciting fights but hey thats just my opinion cant wait for it though :TU:
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by chiggsy »

Have quigley,dodson or dilks got anything lined up in the near future?
I'm sure all three would take the opportunity to get back to winning ways on a big show such as this.
JonRobo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 53
Joined: 14 Nov 2009, 05:40

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by JonRobo »

chiggsy wrote:Have quigley,dodson or dilks got anything lined up in the near future?
I'm sure all three would take the opportunity to get back to winning ways on a big show such as this.
dodson is gunna be on the undercard of this bill fightin at light heavy from now
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by Autobarn »

hayemaker really splashing out on stonking undercard, eh? not to disrespect the hardworking flyweights and bantams, but these are hardly red hot divisions are they? ok for hayemaker as he seems to be intending to cash out in about a year but it does feel a bit cynical. i would rather have some fighters i know from bigger weights in great matchups, to keep me interested and hanging around for the main event.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by alexpaterson »

2 even well matched fights on the undercard hopefully SKY show the excellent card across the pond as well!! Should be a memorable night of boxing
Rockys gum shield
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by Rockys gum shield »

The Haye vs Ruiz undercard was a disgrace to be honest I spent the whole evening other then the Groves fight at the bar.

This doesn't seem much different. Its a good job I'm giving this fight a miss.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by oliverfennell »

neil hibbert wrote:i dont see the problem with the 2 undercard fights announced so far, both really good exciting fights but hey thats just my opinion cant wait for it though :TU:
People complained about the last Haye undercard, but that was like the Superbowl and Wrestlemania combined, compared to this one!
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by Asterix »

As it looks so far, I think I'll only watch the main event.
saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by saturday_kid »

theyre 2 good fights, maybe they will announce some more soon eh, give them chance.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by SteveDow »

Two ok fights but when I've splashed out £150 on a ticket (other will have spent up to £800) I'd expect a bit more than this, especially given that the main event is unlikely to last very long. Surely Groves should have been put on this card rather than one at York Hall two weeks earlier. If they added Dodson and John Watson (who I think is still with Hayemeker) that would make it marginally better. That said, I do think that every live PPV bill should have at least 2 intriguing fights with high profile names.
saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by saturday_kid »

I agree they should have Groves on
ourkid1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 351
Joined: 18 Jun 2009, 12:14

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by ourkid1984 »

2 title fights is no bad thing on an undercard, most Klit fights barely have any other title fights so to have a total of 3 so far isn't tooo bad. Groves needs to go on his own a bit now otherwise he will be like enzo to Joe and Matthew to Ricky and never get truly recognised as a decent fighter in his own right.

Considering Haye barely has any fighters under his promotions anymore after it was built on expecting Setanta not to fold he has to do with fighters who put their self forward and that sounds easy with it being Pay Per View World Heavyweight title show but everyone knows how hard it is to get opposing fighters to fight on other promotions - The main reason why Groves vs De Gale hasn't happened.
MacTavish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 961
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 11:03

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by MacTavish »

SteveDow wrote:Two ok fights but when I've splashed out £150 on a ticket (other will have spent up to £800) I'd expect a bit more than this, especially given that the main event is unlikely to last very long. Surely Groves should have been put on this card rather than one at York Hall two weeks earlier. If they added Dodson and John Watson (who I think is still with Hayemeker) that would make it marginally better. That said, I do think that every live PPV bill should have at least 2 intriguing fights with high profile names.
Buying tickets BEFORE the undercard is announced and then complaining about it's quality and you're expected more for your money :lol:

All you had to do was look at the haye Vs Ruiz undercard to know what sort of stuff would be served up.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Haye Undercard

Post by SteveDow »

MacTavish wrote:
SteveDow wrote:Two ok fights but when I've splashed out £150 on a ticket (other will have spent up to £800) I'd expect a bit more than this, especially given that the main event is unlikely to last very long. Surely Groves should have been put on this card rather than one at York Hall two weeks earlier. If they added Dodson and John Watson (who I think is still with Hayemeker) that would make it marginally better. That said, I do think that every live PPV bill should have at least 2 intriguing fights with high profile names.
Buying tickets BEFORE the undercard is announced and then complaining about it's quality and you're expected more for your money :lol:

All you had to do was look at the haye Vs Ruiz undercard to know what sort of stuff would be served up.
OK smart arse, but if I'd waited until the under card had been announced I would have had to pay 600 pounds plus for a ticket as none of the others are left. The point I was trying to make was that the under card should be of better quality when fans are paying large amounts of money for tickets. Shame morons like you have to spend their time patronising others.
Post Reply