Paul Ingle

Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Paul Ingle

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Just watching some of his old fights- what a fabulous fighter.

How good do you think he was?

How is he these days?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Counter-puncher »

very very good would be my judgement. top 5 british featherweight in last 20 years I'd say. others being naz, brodie? Harrison. not sure Billy Hardy cracks the top 5 but he's thereabouts.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23128
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by mickey1975 »

Ingle was a superb fighter,genuine World class.Unfortunately,hes not very well nowadays.He has put on a load of weight and lives on benefits with his Mum.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by stujones »

Counter-puncher wrote:very very good would be my judgement. top 5 british featherweight in last 20 years I'd say. others being naz, brodie? Harrison. not sure Billy Hardy cracks the top 5 but he's thereabouts.
No mention of Steve Robinson? Colin McMillan?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Counter-puncher »

no. glad you added them. edit; i think at his best Ingle would be better than either, think he'd outwork McMillan and out-skill Robinson, the latter would be an excellent fight.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

stujones wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:very very good would be my judgement. top 5 british featherweight in last 20 years I'd say. others being naz, brodie? Harrison. not sure Billy Hardy cracks the top 5 but he's thereabouts.
No mention of Steve Robinson? Colin McMillan?
Not forgetting Paul Hodkinson :TU:
Back to Ingle,excellent fighter i thought he was world class at his time,top amatuer aswell...does anyone know how hes doing now after his tragic end...
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Counter-puncher »

Hoko too :witzend:
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Counter-puncher wrote:Hoko too :witzend:
Wake up CP :lol: :lol:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Counter-puncher »

still suffering from yesterday :KO:
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

mickey1975 wrote:Ingle was a superb fighter,genuine World class.Unfortunately,hes not very well nowadays.He has put on a load of weight and lives on benefits with his Mum.
Sorry didnt see this...Its a shame for a true warrior like Ingle...boxing soon forgets the way boxers like Paul performed in the ring after a few years&i for one think its WRONG!!
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Jeff Thomas »

1. Naz
2. Harrison
3. Ingle
4. Robinson
5. Mcmillan
6. Brodie
7. Hardy
8. McKenzie
???
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Jeff Thomas wrote:1. Naz
2. Harrison
3. Ingle
4. Robinson
5. Mcmillan
6. Brodie
7. Hardy
8. McKenzie
???
Id have Hoko 3rd-5th he wasnt the same boxer when he fought robinson
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Mimmy »

I see Paul on the odd time in Scarborough, like a previous person says he has put a lot of weight on. Last time i saw him he looked ok (ish) sat having a coffee in the Brunswick Centre with a mate. He didnt look ill but obviously with his injury he cant be 1005.

Great fighter, and went to see him against Naz in Sheffield and he was putting up a good fight until he got stopped. Im sure he now lives in Scalby, Scarborough.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by orbtastic »

mimmy123 wrote:I see Paul on the odd time in Scarborough, like a previous person says he has put a lot of weight on. Last time i saw him he looked ok (ish) sat having a coffee in the Brunswick Centre with a mate. He didnt look ill but obviously with his injury he cant be 1005.

Great fighter, and went to see him against Naz in Sheffield and he was putting up a good fight until he got stopped. Im sure he now lives in Scalby, Scarborough.
It was at the MEN, no?

Ingle was good, had good workrate and movement but lacked genuine one-hit power. He was doing ok against Naz and that got him another chance against Junior Jones, which was a pretty decent scrap.

I think a pre shoulder McMillan could have out-boxed him and a Robinson fight would have been interesting
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by stujones »

I'm bias maybe, but I think a prime Robinson would have smashed Harrison. A Robinson with fantastic durability - he did have Harrison doubled over in their fight.

Harrison get a high ranking cause of his longetivity, compared to some of the guys - but I think in a prime for prime setting. I would fancy Ingle, McMillan and Hokko to do him, in addition to Robinson. McKenzie would probably have been too small, but he would have given him problems while it lasted. Always felt Harrison would be too strong for Brodie though.

On FEATHERWEIGHT achievement over the last 20 years I think I would rank it something like.

1) Hamed, 2) Robinson, 3) Harrison 4) Ingle 5) Brodie 6)McMillan 7) Hodkinson 8) Cook 9) McKenzie 10) Hardy. (honourable mentions to the likes of Jon Jo Irwin, Gary Thornhill, Wayne McCullough).

If I was ranking it on a prime by prime basis it would be more like.

1) Hamed 2)Robinson 3) McMillan 4) Hodkinson 5)Ingle 6) Harrison 7) Brodie 8) McKenzie 9) McCullough 10) Hardy (9 or 10 could be anyone really - Irwin, cook worthy of a mention). Nothing between 2, 3, 4, 5 IMO.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Dont get me wrong McMillan was a class boxer but who did he beat to gain such a high ranking in your eye Stecca was his best win...Hoko best win Villasana far aways that win,plus Hoko beat better fighters i do believe if he hadnt ran into a inform Vargas he would have batterd Robbo...perhaps im being a tad biased coz as a youngster i loved watching him....opinons please people....ps im not a scouser :lol:
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Scrap »

McMillan never reached His peak.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Scrap wrote:McMillan never reached His peak.
Im not disputing he never hit his peak,what you saying Howard he would have been a world beater? how would u rank him??
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by hurlock »

Jeff Thomas wrote:1. Naz
2. Harrison
3. Ingle
4. Robinson
5. Mcmillan
6. Brodie
7. Hardy
8. McKenzie
???
where is mguigan :lol: brodie & mcmillan are far better then robinson pat cowdell also.
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by Jeff Thomas »

hurlock wrote:
Jeff Thomas wrote:1. Naz
2. Harrison
3. Ingle
4. Robinson
5. Mcmillan
6. Brodie
7. Hardy
8. McKenzie
???
where is mguigan :lol: brodie & mcmillan are far better then robinson pat cowdell also.
last 20 years?
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by hurlock »

Jeff Thomas wrote:
hurlock wrote:
Jeff Thomas wrote:1. Naz
2. Harrison
3. Ingle
4. Robinson
5. Mcmillan
6. Brodie
7. Hardy
8. McKenzie
???
where is mguigan :lol: brodie & mcmillan are far better then robinson pat cowdell also.
last 20 years?
was it more then twenty he last boxed :oops: :KO:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by hurlock »

he retired in 1990 so im still good jeffro :OhYes:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by hurlock »

but he announced it in 1990 so still active :DD

i remember seeing ingle trounce all over mcmillan at york hall :!: it was electric, flashes of brilliance from colin but he just couldnt keep ingle of him, he was the hunter :!:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23128
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by mickey1975 »

MachoMan09 wrote:
hurlock wrote:he retired in 1990 so im still good jeffro :OhYes:
His last fight was 1989; so you're wrong. Back in your box.

Ingle was a really good fighter with a terrific work ethic. I distinctly remember that prior to his injury, a good few people who knew him didn't have a lot of praise for him as a person and essentially labelled him and his family as a bit of a nuisance around the area of Scarborough they are from. How much of this animosity was fuelled by jealousy is hard to tell, of course.
I am from North Yorkshire and have never heard anyone say a bad word about Ingle.He was loved in Scarborough in a Ricky Hatton sort of way and lived a very similar lifestyle to Hatton.He was always out on the piss between fights and absolutely hated being away from home.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Paul Ingle

Post by tonyevs »

It could be argued, that Ingles win over Junior Jones was alot more impressive than any of Naz's wins..... Maybe not as spectacular, but for me, more impressive.

Naz made a reputation beating seriously shop-worn opponents. Junior Jones had more left than any name fighter Naz beat.
Post Reply