I think it was a case of a young, hungry, talented fighter beating an old, undermotivated talented fighter who had one foot in retirment.
Just because the favourite loses a close fight it doesn't mean the fight was a 'fix'.
IS IT JUST ME OR WAS THERE SOMETHING FISHY?.......
KOJOE90 wrote:I think it was a case of a young, hungry, talented fighter beating an old, undermotivated talented fighter who had one foot in retirment.
Just because the favourite loses a close fight it doesn't mean the fight was a 'fix'.
Its not just that he lost, its how he lost and the whole vibe surrounding the fight. I saw Kinderlan box our ABA champ just month or so ago and while he wasn't as sharp as at Athens he was about 50% better than he was against Khan on Saturday. He basically didn't look like he was trying!. iF he was motivated enough a month or so ago why was he not motivated against Khan?. And Khan was not much better than in Athens, he had much less to beat last Saturday.
-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50
-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50