Othello, who you've quoted 3 times, is a troll. The majority of people were saying the same as you, Crease. As James says above, Haye was the heavy favourite. Pick a heavy underdog correctly and then collect some kudos.
Here's what I said way before you in the topic:
Asterix wrote:No. Harrison will sh!t himself when the fight starts. Haye's speed should make this fight very clear-cut.
fornicate off Crease - bragging about a prediction most people made shows a lack of class, how about changing your title to 'we told you so'
I'll put my hand up and admit I was wrong - you come back when you can tell me something about Colin Power and Johnny Clark without looking at the database!
Matt W wrote:I had it 90-10 in Haye's favour, generous in hindsight. Not exactly picking Douglas over Tyson is it?
Done some real bloopers in my time - Mario Sheit over Calzaghe in their first fight being the biggest one of them.
But - I got 3 of Tyson's defeats correct (Douglas, Holyfield 2 and Williams). Got 4, but that was after I saw him on the scales vs Lewis.
Veit is actually much better than people think. The nature of his first loss to Calzaghe has basically ruined his reputation. Your pick was not terrible, especially considering Joe hadn't defeated great opposition at the time.
Now, anyone that gave Audley more of a 25 percent chance
tonyevs wrote:Who actually thought Audley would turn up and do nothing?
Even those who correctly predicted an easy Haye win, will have been surprised by how little effort old-Auld did..
Anyone who'd ever seen Audley fight. No actually, anyone who'd ever seen him walk to the ring should have known he'd do nothing! Amazing how many people got caught up in his hype...it's not like there's not been a hundred threads on here over the years laughing at his quotes and claims!
How come you picked Douglas?
