Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Chambers2 »

Matt Skelton
ppb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 100
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 05:04

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by ppb »

Cotto16 wrote:But went on to be Good pro fighters? the only one i can think of is johnny nelson, just started reading his book, so thought i would see if there was any other fighters who didnt do much as a amateur but were good pro's?


Gary Jacobs only had 14 or 15 Amateur contests
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Deserter »

JamesH wrote:
Deserter wrote:
JamesH wrote:Ashley Theophane hasn't done badly considering he didn't win a fight for more than 2 years before turning pro.
:o Crikey, I didn't know that. Genuinely fascinating.
To be honest it actually goes a little further than that... at his original club he couldn't even get a fight! He used to say that the travellers at the club would be favoured and always get the nod ahead of him. He left and joined another club just so he could fight, and then returned a couple of years later at which point he was given the opportunity to fight at his original club. He always said he had too much of a pro style for the am game. Can't say I agree with him, but he's certainly doing much better as a pro. I'd probably put it down to the sparring he's since had in the States rather than being naturally better suited to the pro game.
Thanks for that fella :TU:
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by oliverfennell »

wadey wrote:Matt Skelton??
Quite right. Seem to remember he had NO amateur boxing matches, although he did of course have a lengthy K1 career.
ERIC GUY
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 30 Jan 2009, 21:13

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by ERIC GUY »

Julius Francis,
Gary Mason
Derek Williams
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by wrimc »

I seem to remember Ricky mentioning that Matt Hatton only had 10 amateur fights so despite that he isnt doing too bad
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 776
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by REEVE »

paddy barnes lost his first 15 ama fights?

and im sure one of the walshes (liam maybe) lost there 1st 10 ama fights
Kilsby
Cruiserweight
Posts: 467
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 08:52

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Kilsby »

Tommy hearns was a good / decent amatuer but he was known as a powder-puff puncher of Paulie Malignaggi proportions!

He changed that in the pro's to having one of the most concussive right hands ever! :bow:
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Deserter »

Kilsby wrote:Tommy hearns was a good / decent amatuer but he was known as a powder-puff puncher of Paulie Malignaggi proportions!

He changed that in the pro's to having one of the most concussive right hands ever! :bow:
And surely the ultimate rebuttal to those who claim that punchers are born, not made...
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Shirow »

According to the latest Ring magazine Juan Manuel Marquez only had around 35 amateur fights and Katsidis had over twice as many.

That makes you think doesn't it...
ApolloCreed
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by ApolloCreed »

Tommy hearns was a good / decent amatuer but he was known as a powder-puff puncher of Paulie Malignaggi proportions!

He changed that in the pro's to having one of the most concussive right hands ever!
How did that turnaround come about?
I loved the part in Kimball's book Four Kings where he explains how Hearns changed his nom de guerre from Hitman to The Motor City Cobra after he hurt his right hand.
The whole man, wrote Kimball, was defined by his ability to punch hard.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Deserter »

ApolloCreed wrote: how Hearns changed his nom de guerre from Hitman to The Motor City Cobra after he hurt his right hand.
The whole man, wrote Kimball, was defined by his ability to punch hard.
Which is a shame in some respects as he was an under-rated boxer - he was out-boxing Leonard in their classic Welterweight showdown until Ray turned puncher and wore him down.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26460
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by banjo »

How about Sergio Martinez, apparently he didn't take up boxing until he was 20 and turned pro just a couple of months before his 23rd birthday so I'm guessing he didn't have the hottest of amateur careers.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by palooka »

Junior Witter wasn't that hot as an amateur.
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Scrap »

Clinton Woods, Terry Dunstan
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by J »

hopkins .
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Old bones Ian »

King Geedorah wrote:
ApolloCreed wrote:
Tommy hearns was a good / decent amatuer but he was known as a powder-puff puncher of Paulie Malignaggi proportions!

He changed that in the pro's to having one of the most concussive right hands ever!
How did that turnaround come about?
I loved the part in Kimball's book Four Kings where he explains how Hearns changed his nom de guerre from Hitman to The Motor City Cobra after he hurt his right hand.
The whole man, wrote Kimball, was defined by his ability to punch hard.
Strange, he was billed as 'The Motor City Cobra' early in his career and I was under the impression that he went to 'Hitman' as his career wore on.
Hearns had a 155-8 amateur record, but only 7 stoppages.
Kilsby
Cruiserweight
Posts: 467
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 08:52

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by Kilsby »

^^^
I heard Hearns wasn't technically throwing his punches correctly in the amateurs & Manny Steward got him to plant his feet correctly & 'sit down' on his punches more which ultilised his power that he had always had but never used due to feet not being set right.
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by dalcumly »

Do you really need to have had any amateur career ? Generally I would say you do but if a trainer identifies someone perhaps in their late teens or early twenties who is naturally heavy handed or just a natural puncher , like Julian Jackson , then I think its possible.Get them fit first of all . Then a good bit of sparring in the gym and if they're picking up defensive skills and retaining their natural punch then I don't see why not . I don't know if Jackson had an amateur career , but my goodness could he punch !! If you watch his fights you just can't see where the power came from .
I believe punchers are born , not made , and I'm off to start a new topic !!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by palooka »

There is no real substitute for boxing in front of an audience. The experience of boxing in front of a crowd can be stressful, draining and nerve racking. Being able to handle those feelings and the nerves of a bout is about as important as having boxing skills in having any sort of half way successful professional boxing career. The way to learn how to handle the emotions is through amateur bouts.
ApolloCreed
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42

Re: Have there been many Fighters who were not great amateurs

Post by ApolloCreed »

Strange, he was billed as 'The Motor City Cobra' early in his career and I was under the impression that he went to 'Hitman' as his career wore on.
Maybe it was that when he hurt his hand, he grew depressed because he couldn't bang the lights out anymore, and stopped calling himself Hitman, going back to the original one.
Something along those lines anyway.
Post Reply