I think the system has a flux capacitor issue.
Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
Why is a two time champion, with an extensive record, ranked below a guy who's never been world champion, who has actually lost to Froch?
I think the system has a flux capacitor issue.

I think the system has a flux capacitor issue.
Re: Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxRe ... escription
It's stats with no subjectivity so you will always get crazy-seeming anomalies.
The alternative is to introduce some element of subjectivity to it, which isn't the idea.
It's stats with no subjectivity so you will always get crazy-seeming anomalies.
The alternative is to introduce some element of subjectivity to it, which isn't the idea.
Re: Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
I agree, not a flawless system and there is no way Dirrell should be ahead of Froch, based on past performances, fine acting jobs and rubbish excuses as to why he had to withdraw from the Super Six.G0mez wrote:Why is a two time champion, with an extensive record, ranked below a guy who's never been world champion, who has actually lost to Froch?
I think the system has a flux capacitor issue.
Now if Boxrec rankings take those things into account, then maybe he should be ahead of them all?
Re: Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
How?bengulnaci1 wrote:
Now if Boxrec rankings take those things into account
Re: Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
Sorry, I was attempting to be ironic.....and failing badly ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Dirrell above Froch in boxrec rankings?
bengulnaci1 wrote:Sorry, I was attempting to be ironic.....and failing badly