Heavies who could have been cruiserweight legends
-
Chopping Right
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 588
- Joined: 08 May 2005, 17:39
Heavies who could have been cruiserweight legends
I think the cruiserweight division has been something of a dead duck since it's inception, since a good cruiser can make more money being an average heavyweight. So the best cruisers have always moved up as soon as they thought the financial gain was ripe, and plenty of others have bypassed the cruisers altogether in the rush to heavyweight riches. But if there was an equal amount of money to be made at cruiser, which heavyweights might have been great and long-reigning cruiserweights?
Chris Byrd springs to mind, as does Herbie Hide, a sledgehammer puncher but never a true heavy.
Chris Byrd springs to mind, as does Herbie Hide, a sledgehammer puncher but never a true heavy.
I would say Roy Joney, Holyfield, Tarver, Johnson, Byrd, would all have been excelent Cruisers (of course some were already).
But honestly, how do you make Cruiser as financially awarding as heavy? People have a fascination with the unlimited class so they would always pay more to see fights in that class.
But honestly, how do you make Cruiser as financially awarding as heavy? People have a fascination with the unlimited class so they would always pay more to see fights in that class.
-
Chopping Right
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 588
- Joined: 08 May 2005, 17:39
Heavyweights who could have been Cruiserweight Legends.
Ezzard Charles, Floyd Patterson.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
-
Chopping Right
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 588
- Joined: 08 May 2005, 17:39
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Young did pretty well himself at HW by itself . . he was actually more troubled by the boxers (Norton, Ali (though he won that fight) then the big punchers (he easily beat Foreman and Lyle).KOJOE90 wrote:Jimmy Young?
There's no such thing as a cruiser legend. Cruiserweight was a horrible idea in the first place, it was only created by the sacntioning bodies for more fees. But it backfired. Every cruiser who was worth anything put on the few lbs and moved to HW
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Too true!!!dempseyfire wrote:Young did pretty well himself at HW by itself . . he was actually more troubled by the boxers (Norton, Ali (though he won that fight) then the big punchers (he easily beat Foreman and Lyle).KOJOE90 wrote:Jimmy Young?
There's no such thing as a cruiser legend. Cruiserweight was a horrible idea in the first place, it was only created by the sacntioning bodies for more fees. But it backfired. Every cruiser who was worth anything put on the few lbs and moved to HW
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
I think Cruiserweight is necessary today. Maybe it wasnt than needed 10-15 years ago,dempseyfire wrote:Young did pretty well himself at HW by itself . . he was actually more troubled by the boxers (Norton, Ali (though he won that fight) then the big punchers (he easily beat Foreman and Lyle).KOJOE90 wrote:Jimmy Young?
There's no such thing as a cruiser legend. Cruiserweight was a horrible idea in the first place, it was only created by the sacntioning bodies for more fees. But it backfired. Every cruiser who was worth anything put on the few lbs and moved to HW
but today it is close to impossible for a lt-hv to jump to heavyweight and be competitive at the top. The only recent example is Roy Jones who did beat a limited, soon after divorce Ruiz. But the fact that the ref made Ruiz break and fight was the decisive factor. Even so, Roy only had one single fight at heavy. I doubt he would have been successful if he stuck around for more fights againt top 10 guys. Todays heavies are too large for a lt-hv who just jumped up from 175lb.
So while lacklustre, the cruiserweight is necessary. IT is like a training ground if you will for gifted lt-hvs who want to move to heavy. They need the stopover at 200lb before moving up for the big money.