I feel a slight sense of guilt for introducing the forum to this writer.
For the uninitiated - and I sincerely hope that's most of you - he did a piece on how Froch looked scared in the preamble to the Abraham fight and was going to get battered. Then, despite being completely wrong, still managed to call Froch a load of rubbish in his write up.
The best bit is in the third paragraph when he really starts to believe the sh1t he's shovelling 'This could be a lot easier knockout win for Maidana than I originally predicted' (two paragraphs before, presumably).
Good god, that really is a dreadfully written article. Poor guy seems thoroughly grammatically challenged*. It just looks like a bad post on a forum rather than a well thought through piece. If he wasted more than 10 minutes of his life writing it then it's a real shame for him.
*I make no excuses for any erroneous spelling or grammar within this post as this is not a 'published' article.... :P
That is a bad piece of writing, i thought that Teddy Atlas was bad the other week in BN, he had predicted a Margarito win, but when it didn't happen, he wrote a peice stating why he was right , but Margarito hadn't followed his fight plan and if he had he would probably of won. Good old Teddy , he's never wrong you know.
I have to admit, reading his articles are my guilty pleasure. The reaction he gets from people is brilliant but i can't see why people fall for it with each and every article!
I've been away for a couple of weeks with no internet access so decided to have a catch up on his 'articles' for Froch v Abraham. Before the fight it was Abraham is superior etc etc then after he was shot from the Dirrell defeat and Froch followed his game plan and will get smashed by Johnson
Can't see him on there, he's probably had some pills and a lie down, but his fellow "writer" fills in and calls it "The most outlandish robbery of the decade!!"
The articles on that site are complete trash, don't even check it for news any more because the authors either have an agenda or regurgitate cliches. From what I hear he is one of the worst and most biased, which is quite an achievement.
sg1985 wrote:Boxing is amazing, you could have fighter A completely dominate fighter B for every second of every round and there will be someone with an excuse. I remember reading a thread on here, someone was trying to pin Lacy's poor performance against Joe to the high altitude the fight was held at in Manchester.
I just read the Boxing News 24 take on that fight. What a ridiculous take on a great fight. The guy sounds like a 15 year old over-opinionated child who just saw his favourite boxer get beat. Pathetic. I actually have a link to that site on my Boxing Betting site, for what it's worth that link will be getting removed!
