rhino222 wrote:i would like to see matthew hatton KO'd by paulie, its a shame as i dont even know matthew hatton as a person, but my dislike has grown from team hattons greed (in my opinion) towards the end of rickys career.
I think you might need expanding on this point?
Is this regarding Billy Graham? Or the fact Hatton didn't fight Witter? If its the latter then I just simply cannot agree with you on it. Hatton got great money yes - but he fought the best two fighters of the generation and gave it his all in both fights..... Yes, something clearly wasn't right with Hatton in the Pacquiao fight - he didn't look well coming into the ring, but he certainly fought with attitude and balls and thats why he ended up as he did.
Or are you suggesting that "team Hatton" made Ricky a sacrificial lamb for the Pacquiao fight - the team knew he was out of his depth but took the fight for the cash. Again, I will politely disagree with you. Pacquiao at that time was not proven at 140 lbs. All he had done was beat a shell of Oscar. At 135 he struggled (albeit in a masterful display) to get that absolutely rock chinned David Diaz out of there. Ricky had just come off argueably his performance of his career. He might not have excelled at 147 - but his previous fight at 140 possibly his best displays at the weight, and he looked good against Castillo. Okay, he wasn't outstanding against Lazcano but that could be attributed to alot of things. Your only as good as your last fight, and Ricky was outstanding. I think team Hatton rightfully believed they stood a fighting chance. I don't think anyone in their right mind at the time, who saw Pacquiao pound Diaz for 9 rounds before finally making him take a backward step - thought he would turn out to be a puncher at 147 and possibly (actually probably) at 154.