Just a few questions that I think deserve further analysis:
- Was Khan worried like mad in training?
- What is a pillor ('knocked from pillor to post')?
Cheers Wake Up! I only need to see this thread reactivated to make me smile! Mmm. Is The Gilf really this cunning, I wonder? Not beyond him to be a master spin doctor as well as a journalistic genius. This man can turn his hand to anything. As has been pointed out though, clearly not written by a British Muslim, way too many Americanisms in there. So that's Five aliases and counting, yes?Wake up call wrote:http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/12/ami ... -his-fans/
Another piece of Gilfoid's shite. Now he's pretending to a British muslim.
The facts that he writes "defense" instead of the English "defence" and he spells Pakistan incorrectly clearly show that this tripe was not written by a British muslim.
Exactly - the man's a legend. Possibly the biggest c*nt in the web boxing world and you know there's so much more to come. Normally I'd be with Chambers' moral indignation but Gilfoid and all his aliases rise far above that into a new stratosphere.MightyWarrior wrote:He is the "Plan nine from out of space" of boxing writing - a level so bad that it makes you doubt your sanity. Each of his articles hits a new low, and you think it can't get any worse....then next one arrives, and crashes though the floor to a new level that you never previously knew existed.
Don't speak so ill of the best comedy writer since Woody Allensg1985 wrote:Please stop linking him, he makes me want to gouge out my eyes while I'm reading it.
mainly so he can have another dig at Froch..... wait until DeGale beats an american, then he will definately change his tuneIan 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Latest Khan hating piece from an alias: http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/12/is- ... ver-hyped/
But the great man, under his own name, throws us crazy Brits a curveball by loving DeGale:
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2010/12/deg ... more-50245
Honestly, that makes it funnier for me. I have mental images of this fat, stained T-shirt wearing buffoon in a basement somewhere posting increasingly furious articles as his predictions fail to materialise.sg1985 wrote:It not funny because he believes the shit he writes.dookus wrote:Don't speak so ill of the best comedy writer since Woody Allensg1985 wrote:Please stop linking him, he makes me want to gouge out my eyes while I'm reading it.
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:When you're lawyer reads 'The Best of The Gilf', he'll abandon the law and take up the quill at ringside, trying to emulate the great one.Scottrf wrote:I'm currently looking into the legal implications of this Ian. You may be hearing from my laywer.
Don't put him through it mate. I've been there. I'm still there, in fact.
Yes. Cached BoxRec pages still increase views when they are accessed provided they have a count mechanism on the page (which is the collated at the website level)Datsue wrote:Before I generate any revenue for them, can someone answer a question for me please (Asterix & Poncey mate I'm looking at you two here!)?
If you go in via a cached page, does the website still get hits?
Your name is Scott, is the name change trying to hide something mr formerly known as SG1985? ;;-)The Dark Destroyer wrote:We should have known Groves would win. Gilfoid predicted Groves had little chance.
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2011/04/dir ... has-flaws/Scott Gilfoid wrote:I’m giving Groves very little chance of beating DeGale on May 21st.
"This is going to be embarrassing."SWALSH wrote:He's done it again. Another pricelss prediction;
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2011/06/joh ... more-68676