Webb v Pryce

el torro · Post by **el torro** » 23 Dec 2010, 15:14

5th of Feb, Pryce is in for Prince Arron.

Terrrrry · Post by **Terrrrry** » 23 Dec 2010, 16:54

Why has Prince Aaron withdrawn?

Really fancied Webb/Aaron to be a good, intruiging little scrap.

supacook2k · Post by **supacook2k** » 23 Dec 2010, 17:08

cant wait for this. just received a message of pryce confirming it. hope pryce wins it.

gmanji · Post by **gmanji** » 23 Dec 2010, 17:24

Webb will box his ears off. Then Brian Rose will beat the winner.

Grays_Dan · Post by **Grays_Dan** » 23 Dec 2010, 17:51

Where is this?

Gavler · Post by **Gavler** » 23 Dec 2010, 18:32

gmanji wrote:Webb will box his ears off. Then Brian Rose will beat the winner.

Are you Joking

. Agree with the first bit but not the secound

tonyevs · Post by **tonyevs** » 23 Dec 2010, 18:49

... so why did he only recently move down?

Would have prefered for Pryce to stay at welter. But a title chance is too good to turn down.

boxer111 · Post by **boxer111** » 23 Dec 2010, 19:15

webb will win this easy price is shit dont even deserve the shot he's just a gate keeper

sugar sweet 1 · Post by **sugar sweet 1** » 24 Dec 2010, 02:33

tonyevs wrote:... so why did he only recently move down?

Would have prefered for Pryce to stay at welter. But a title chance is too good to turn down.

couldnt say no to this fight mate,welter or light-middle,il get to where i want to be,seems im gonna shock a few people when i beat webb.

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 24 Dec 2010, 05:01

Busy Sam Webb defends his British light-middleweight title against perennial Welsh threat Bradley Pryce in Brentwood on February 5.
Webb is desperate to win a Lonsdale Belt outright since lifting it last year with an upset decision over Anthony Small. The popular Londoner retained with an impressive eleven-round knockout of Leicester's gutsy Martin Concepcion in October and now for the dangerous and dangerously unpredictable Pryce, who also holds wins over Small and Concepcion (both emphatic stoppages) and earned his shot with a solid decision over former Prizefighter winner Michael Lomax last month in Newport to take his record to 31-8 (18).
Pryce can do it all on his best nights but then he has nights when he is eminently beatable, and you wonder if his time has past after 11 hard years as a pro, although you write him off at your peril. Nevertheless, the clever, aggressive Webb looks likely to grind out a decision.

sugar sweet 1 · Post by **sugar sweet 1** » 24 Dec 2010, 05:10

bennie wrote:Busy Sam Webb defends his British light-middleweight title against perennial Welsh threat Bradley Pryce in Brentwood on February 5.
Webb is desperate to win a Lonsdale Belt outright since lifting it last year with an upset decision over Anthony Small. The popular Londoner retained with an impressive eleven-round knockout of Leicester's gutsy Martin Concepcion in October and now for the dangerous and dangerously unpredictable Pryce, who also holds wins over Small and Concepcion (both emphatic stoppages) and earned his shot with a solid decision over former Prizefighter winner Michael Lomax last month in Newport to take his record to 31-8 (18).
Pryce can do it all on his best nights but then he has nights when he is eminently beatable, and you wonder if his time has past after 11 hard years as a pro, although you write him off at your peril. Nevertheless, the clever, aggressive Webb looks likely to grind out a decision.

im the best i have EVER been,my record looks dodgy but thats because i have always been the yes man to any fight,but when i said yes to this fight its for all the right reasons. people can write me off but on the 5th of feb i will become the new champ.

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 24 Dec 2010, 05:16

You will do well, Bradley.

Scottrf · Post by **Scottrf** » 24 Dec 2010, 05:23

Let's hope 'The Pryce is right'

boxer111 · Post by **boxer111** » 24 Dec 2010, 05:46

lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement

Scottrf · Post by **Scottrf** » 24 Dec 2010, 05:50

boxer111 wrote:lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement

Don't like crediting these keyboard warriors with a response but it's interesting how they never have more than a few posts to their name.

tonyevs · Post by **tonyevs** » 24 Dec 2010, 06:18

Scottrf wrote:
boxer111 wrote:lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement
Don't like crediting these keyboard warriors with a response but it's interesting how they never have more than a few posts to their name.

Very often its a different account to slag people off they are too scared of meeting ....tossers!

All the best Brad. Just stay away from the beer & leave the chocolate to Jenna and the kids..

Merry Xmas

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 24 Dec 2010, 11:16

boxer111 wrote:lol @ pryce u said that every month for the last 5 years your a joke webb will smash u into retirement

Total knob

Adam1991 · Post by **Adam1991** » 24 Dec 2010, 13:54

Brian Rose Was Offered It First Apparently But Wouldnt Take The Fight On 5 Weeks Notice And Also Has A Hand Injury

liamlion · Post by **liamlion** » 25 Dec 2010, 10:01

Good luck Bradley. Train hard, well and properly and you give yourself everychance

FtmPress · Post by **FtmPress** » 26 Dec 2010, 05:05

Grays_Dan wrote:Where is this?

Feb 5 at brentwood Price will be support fight every british heavyweight who has be offered Price has turn him down.

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 26 Dec 2010, 05:16

Pryce could be a banana skin for Webb, if Pryce comes into the fight fully prepared and fit he stands a chance.
In the past few years its only Hall that has done a number on Pryce, and Hall could KO anyone he hit cleanly.

Webb looked good last time out, and should keep improving. But he does mark up and if Pryce gets into a rythum then he can cause a few problems, cuts may come into this.

I'm still going for the boxer on the way up Webb to win in about 10 rounds, but he won't have it all his own way.

Lightsoot · Post by **Lightsoot** » 26 Dec 2010, 05:41

I like Pryce for this providing he trains properly and maintains his focus. Webb has improved but I didn't think he did enough to merit the decision against Anthony Small and he beat a very limited Martin Concepcion to retain.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 26 Dec 2010, 07:06

Cannot help but think "why" is this for the right reasons. Bradley has been mentioning since the Hall fight that he is going to campaign at Welter - so why moving back up?

I fear the right reasons is cause of the lack of opportunities at Welter.

1southpaw · Post by **1southpaw** » 26 Dec 2010, 07:22

stujones wrote:Cannot help but think "why" is this for the right reasons. Bradley has been mentioning since the Hall fight that he is going to campaign at Welter - so why moving back up?

I fear the right reasons is cause of the lack of opportunities at Welter.

but even if Pryce gets beat he could still get a shot at the British title at welter ???

sugar sweet 1 · Post by **sugar sweet 1** » 27 Dec 2010, 04:11

stujones wrote:Cannot help but think "why" is this for the right reasons. Bradley has been mentioning since the Hall fight that he is going to campaign at Welter - so why moving back up?

I fear the right reasons is cause of the lack of opportunities at Welter.

im a welterweight.but i do feel feel ok at light-middle with the extra weight,would of loved to be offered a title fight at welterweight,but happy was given a shot at light-middle,i stepped up for the commonwealth title and stayed in division for 6 years,il do same again when i win british title,i would like to end my career at welter so il go back down when iv won the title outright,

Webb v Pryce

Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce

Re: Webb v Pryce