Commonwealth Title??

franko1990
Cruiserweight
Posts: 88
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 07:58

Commonwealth Title??

Post by franko1990 »

Why dont more Australians get a shot at a Commonwealth Title is it because they dont care about it any more, or has the value of the belt declined. I might be wrong but I'd rather win a Commonwealth over a Regional title any day..
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by bollox »

It's because Commonwealth titles don't carry the weight they once did. Plus they're a long-cut to a BS 'world' title

p.s. here's a pic of a former Commonwealth champ
Image
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Craig14 »

Plus, like the cricket the aussies are longway behind there British counterparts.
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by bollox »

Empire (Commonwealth) ratings December 7th 1972

Image
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Craig14 »

I used to work with a guy, Joe Jackson who fought Tony Mundine.
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by bollox »

A gym directory from Fighter magazine September 1968

Image
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Craig14 »

Have you just come back from a garage sale?
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by bollox »

:D Nah, I just felt like posting some stuff from a time when Commonwealth titles actually meant something

What did Joe say about Tony Mundine? I bet he didn't say he was a loudmouth twat :OhYes:
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Brute »

yid14 wrote:I used to work with a guy, Joe Jackson who fought Tony Mundine.
Went the distance with him too.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Brute »

bollox wrote:It's because Commonwealth titles don't carry the weight they once did. Plus they're a long-cut to a BS 'world' title

p.s. here's a pic of a former Commonwealth champ
Image
I trained with Charkey. Shit he could punch!
Rogue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 718
Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 05:50

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Rogue »

Bollox, thanks for posting...great stuff mate. See if I can dig up some old stuff my self from archives.....
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

i wish they were still valued, i would rather that than a bogus world title any day
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Craig14 »

bollox wrote::D Nah, I just felt like posting some stuff from a time when Commonwealth titles actually meant something

What did Joe say about Tony Mundine? I bet he didn't say he was a loudmouth twat :OhYes:
I only worked on the same site as him but I admit I tried to have a chat with him as much as I could, very humble seemed more into the fact that he was N.Z l.heavy champ than fighting Tony Mundine. He says that he won alot more fights than boxrec giv him credit for, but I guess thats just the era, I've got a south african mate Dean Evans (super middleweight) who says the same (although he reckons he lost a few) - Anyone on the aussie board who knows deans number, last time I spoke to him he reckons Soul Pouwnsby was training at his gym, Mount Eden area????
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by oliverfennell »

It was good that the commentators on Vea-Siale were enthusiastic about it being for the Commonwealth belt. True to say it's not what it once was, but it's still a whole lot better than the WBF and the various lesser Asia-Pacific belts, not to mention having Oceanic boxers competing for Latin and African belts, FFS. Anything that encourages the Commonwealth belt to get a greater hold Down Under is a welcome move. Same could be said for Canada, for that matter. It's virtually a British monopoly as it is, and even speaking as a Brit, that's not a good thing. There's some tasty matches to be made if Aus and Canada got more involved with the Comm belt.
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Sweet P »

I agree 100% Oliver, I would love to see the Commenwealth Title be contested between British Aussie and Canadian fighters. There are so many great fights to be made.

It really is a shame that it isnt held in high regard here any more, Id love to see more Aussie guys fight for Aus Title, then go for Commenwealth Title,Then major regional, followed by World Title.

Maybe you could put Aus Title, then major Regional, then Commenwealth. As id say its harder to get a Commenwealth Belt than 95% of regionals.
davidk59
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 04:30

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by davidk59 »

It's harder to get a Commonwealth belt ,because who wants to travel that far for it.
You could get a legitimate World title in our own backyard look at Manny Pacman got the title in Thailand , Fenech and a few others as well got titles in our own region .
It would be the same airfare to fight for a legitimate World title as it would be to fight for the Commonwealth belt.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Da Voice »

C'wealth title is by far more prestigious & better earner than any Regional title.
The fact that most champs are UK based is the problem for Aussies 'cos Oz is @ the arse end of planet earth (so to speak).
So they look at listed contenders in their backyard or close enough......such as Africa.
I would be different if CBC rated contenders, but it doesn't...It lists them in alphabetical order.

Regional title such as OPBF, PABA IBF Pan Pac & WBO Asia Pacific can get guys 'world ' rating within their respective peak body, but in most cases it means SFA, unless spotted by one of world's major promoters.......or have an Oz promoter prepared to stage 'world' title challenge, which Oz just doesn't have ATM.

Over the last 15+ years, most Oz guys that eventually got a shot @ 'world' title via above mentioned Regionals, didn't get a great deal more $$$$$$ than to cover sanction fees they paid to above mentioned Regional organizations to get the opportunity.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Da Voice »

BTW, CBC doesn't require business class jet setting & 5 star hotel staying junket boys. The title is contested according to rules & regs where it's contested and officiated by locals

Can't wait for kylamy's response :lol: :lol:
davidk59
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 04:30

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by davidk59 »

I believe that if the Commonwealth title can't get you any higher ranked in the World than our regional titles how is it better .
Don't forget fighters want to tell their grandkids they where WORLD champs not Commonwealth champs . You fight for a World title to win it ,then the money will come in.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Da Voice »

Commonwealth title will get one a rating in WBC, but not if one continually defends the title against duds, which is the case with WBA, IBF & WBO regionals

CBC is one of 3 WBC mothers, albeit these days, WBC is more of private (family) enterprise as is WBA.
davidk59
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 04:30

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by davidk59 »

You can fight good fighters in our region too, Shane Cameron fought David Tua .Now if he would have won ,he could have got a shot at a World title.
Commonwealth title has got nothing to do with anything here any more now I'm sorry but it's a fact.
People can fight stiffs whether it's Commonwealth title or our Regional titles.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Da Voice »

Both Tua & Cameron have use by date clearly stamped on their forehead. Who the fark would wanna see either of them in 'world' title fight??
davidk59
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 04:30

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by davidk59 »

I'm not saying that they are not past their use by date but they generated a lot of money for a regional title over here so would it have made any difference if it was for a Commonwealth title .
David Tua would have easily beaten Martin Rogan would it have made any difference to his ranking for doing so.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by Da Voice »

Tua is a "has been" & no value to any promoter outside New Zealand :P
davidk59
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 08 Nov 2008, 04:30

Re: Commonwealth Title??

Post by davidk59 »

I don't agree with that,because in the Heavyweight division the last thing a fighter looses is his punch .David Tua hasn't been in form I'll admit but if one of the champs underestimate him and use him as an opponent they could be in for a bit of a shock.
Post Reply