Would Collins have beaten Eubank and Benn in their primes?

Post Reply

Would Collins have beaten Eubank and Benn in their primes?

Yes, same results
3
17%
No, he'd have lost
15
83%
 
Total votes: 18

Chopping Right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 588
Joined: 08 May 2005, 17:39

Would Collins have beaten Eubank and Benn in their primes?

Post by Chopping Right »

Would Steve Collins have beaten Chris Eubank and Nigel Benn in their primes, or did he get them at the "right times"?
lirva33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by lirva33 »

No.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

No way, a prime Benn would have stretched him.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1954
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Post by liamlion »

I can understand the arguement that Benn was not the fighter he once was when he fought Collins. But Eubank certainly wasnt shot when he fought Collins, in fact Eubank put up a better showing in the two Collins fights than he had previously done in many others, upon which Eubank was often given very generous decisions having fought in fits and starts.

Collins simply had Eubank's number. Collins always worked at a frenetic pace whereas Eubank was too used to coasting along. Regardless of when Collins would have fought Eubank, Collins would always of outhussled and outfought Eubank.
Chopping Right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 588
Joined: 08 May 2005, 17:39

Post by Chopping Right »

liamlion wrote:Collins simply had Eubank's number.
You may be right there, perhaps I should have split the poll down a little further to differentiate between Benn and Eubank. Personally I still think they both would have beaten Collins at their peaks but Eubank would have always had more trouble with the Collins work ethic.
celticwarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 105
Joined: 30 Oct 2003, 09:57

Post by celticwarrior »

liamlion wrote:I can understand the arguement that Benn was not the fighter he once was when he fought Collins. But Eubank certainly wasnt shot when he fought Collins, in fact Eubank put up a better showing in the two Collins fights than he had previously done in many others, upon which Eubank was often given very generous decisions having fought in fits and starts.

Collins simply had Eubank's number. Collins always worked at a frenetic pace whereas Eubank was too used to coasting along. Regardless of when Collins would have fought Eubank, Collins would always of outhussled and outfought Eubank.
I'd agree completely with that. As for Benn I think that would have been much harder to call but I don't agree with the poster who said Benn would have stretched him. THe last thing to go is a fighters power and Benn hit Collins flush on plenty of occasions in both fights. When he saw it was having no real effect on Collins he pretty much gave up.

I think the only difference with a prime Benn is that he would have been hungrier and had more desire for a tear up which in my opinion he lost after the McClellan fight. I don't think he'd have stopped Collins though (certainly not the big strong super middleweight version who walked through Eubank and Benn's best shots) so the late rounds would have been very interesting.
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Post by Loftgroov »

Out-boxed by Eubank, out-powered by Benn.

He definitely came along at the right time. Both should have retired earlier.
ABA Boxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 772
Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 13:37

Post by ABA Boxing »

Those were the days of British Boxing :TU:

Eubank still makes me smile with his antics :D

1) Eubank
2) Benn
3) Collins
Post Reply