Taking ability into account is fine, but ranking a fighter that has only been fighting at Area title level in the top 30 is going much too far, no matter how good he looks.jessi wrote:Horse p4p lists are never easy to compile but in my opinion you have to take ability in to the equation, because if your looking at opponents they have fought and how quickly they have got rid of them, then you have to look at what opponents there opponents have fought and so on, maybe frankie gavins opponents are not as highly rated as other peoples opponents but surely you look at the ease he wins and how technicly gifted he is ?
There are at least 99 professionals in Britain/Ireland who have better pro records than Gavin.jessi wrote:you say he wouldent even be in your top 100, so your saying theres atleast 99 better professionals currently in the uk at the moment then frankie gavin ?
I don't see what is wrong with waiting for a fighter to beat good opposition before giving them a good P4P ranking. Gavin hasn't even reached English title level, so why should he be in the P4P top 30? If he is as good as most people think he is then he will be beating good opposition soon, so he can enter the list then.
There is very little chance that Gavin would jump into the top 10 for beating a British champion in his next fight.jessi wrote:ok what if he was to win a british title on his next fight ? would he jump from 100 + sraight into maybe the top ten ? if you were to take naturally ability into account on your p4p i think it would make alot more sense !