Scottrf wrote:. I've not once resorted to name calling in years of posting on forums.
this thread's a ruddy mess, shut her down, shut her down before it gets any worse!!
Scottrf wrote:. I've not once resorted to name calling in years of posting on forums.
It was a knockout victory, which is more conclusive than many fights. Does every fight that you think might go differently another time need a rematch? Barely any rematch would be completely pointless, doesn't make it ducking. He already fought him, and has the best opposition of any Heavyweight in history.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:what I would like to say, contrary to the opinion expressed by several on here, is that in my eyes you can't say that Ali's victory over Foreman was so conclusive as to render any possible rematch pointless.
You must have missed all those right hands Ali threw.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote: For the most part Ali stood there and protected himself and did not much offensively at all.
True, the fight has been rewritten to Ali spending the whole time on the ropes absorbing punches, not how it went at all.Collins2000 wrote:You must have missed all those right hands Ali threw.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote: For the most part Ali stood there and protected himself and did not much offensively at all.
George didn't.
A bit of this might be semantics. Re Ali, I'm not sure 'ducking' can be levelled at someone when you've already knocked the fella out. They had their chance, f**k it.Buncey wrote:OK...history lesson ladies:
Foreman got it wrong in Zaire. In the years that followed he chased Ali and took out full page adverts in New York Times and other papers and was the subject of a front page at Boxing News begging Ali for a rematch. Ali was busy with Dunne, Spaniards and stuff like!
Lewis and Tyson was late by five or six or seven years. Lewis and Holyfield was late. And, Bowe not fighting Lewis or Lewis not fighting Bowe was bigger at the time than Haye and Klitschkos making excuses, trust me.
You need to read contemporary newspaper reports - try my stuff in the Daily Telegraph for Lewis.
Stander...you serious?
It's been a long time on here since I had to talk to such a effing dimwit.
Now eff off and look up some papers and get an education you tosser.
Adios.
The only person who believes it's own hype is you Steve, take that ego for a walk and put it on a leash please.Buncey wrote:Classy remarks etc...you have an opinion, express it and then people start crying. I think this site is starting to believe its hype!
Collins2000 wrote:You must have missed all those right hands Ali threw.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote: For the most part Ali stood there and protected himself and did not much offensively at all.
George didn't.
You make fair points, IMO, Dioufy. Buncey has been very dismissive of forums in the past but knows that they contain a big hardcore of fans so advertises his shows. That's fair enough - but if you go and drink in a pub because the beer's cheap, don't go mad when the customers aren't to your liking.Dioufy wrote:How am I being patronising? It's clear fact. He comes on here plugging his BBC spot left, right and centre, and rightly so, but when someone disagrees with him and he reacts like that it's not going to do him many favours. I look forward to Buncey posting, but that post was bang out of order.Final round wrote:Bite the hands that feed you... that's pretty bloody patronising.Dioufy wrote:I agree, Stander wouldn't be a champ, but come on, dude. You don't have to settle for petty, and quite embarressing name-calling. Like someone said, you pimp your BBC slot out on here, yet bite the hand that feeds you. To resort to such silly retorts I thought was beyond a man like yourself.![]()
rhino222 wrote:hey..steve has passion, dont knock him for that, the boxing world would be boring without him...
Wales wrote:rhino222 wrote:hey..steve has passion, dont knock him for that, the boxing world would be boring without him...
Totally agree.... I wouldn't even watch the sport, ever, if it wasnt for Steve Bunce.
Got to say Wales, that was pretty good!Wales wrote:rhino222 wrote:hey..steve has passion, dont knock him for that, the boxing world would be boring without him...
Totally agree.... I wouldn't even watch the sport, ever, if it wasnt for Steve Bunce.
needless to say that comment was tounge in cheek...gobbles wrote:Wales wrote:rhino222 wrote:hey..steve has passion, dont knock him for that, the boxing world would be boring without him...
Totally agree.... I wouldn't even watch the sport, ever, if it wasnt for Steve Bunce.
Really? So your interest in boxing has nothing to do with the boxers, it's all Steve Bunce. How bizarre.
Ha ha, Ian, ta. The bit that kinda riled me was him saying that this forum is believeing its own hype - what the hell does that mean? If it means what I think it might mean then that's the pot calling the kettle a stupid little shite, if you get my cryptic meaning. Kudos on that analogy, too, big man.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:You make fair points, IMO, Dioufy. Buncey has been very dismissive of forums in the past but knows that they contain a big hardcore of fans so advertises his shows. That's fair enough - but if you go and drink in a pub because the beer's cheap, don't go mad when the customers aren't to your liking.Dioufy wrote:How am I being patronising? It's clear fact. He comes on here plugging his BBC spot left, right and centre, and rightly so, but when someone disagrees with him and he reacts like that it's not going to do him many favours. I look forward to Buncey posting, but that post was bang out of order.Final round wrote: Bite the hands that feed you... that's pretty bloody patronising.![]()
Well, if it means them throwing their toys out of the pram because we don't agree with what they say or toe their line then they can all go now and they won't be missed - thats my personal opinion. This was a great site before they all turned up anyway.junior pepa seed wrote:This sort of thing stops fighters and Journos posting on forums.
Bunce knows this site is the home of the hard core boxing fan, the people his audience figures depend on. Crapping on us is like a politician crapping on his own constituents. He risks driving away a key part of his audience, and without an audience there's no show, and without a show, no wages. Everyone says things they regret in the heat of the moment, but he's had plenty of time to cool off now and there's been no sign of an apology.Final round wrote:
Because you don't pay his wages directly, he goes to work like the rest of us and drums up some guests for a sport we all love and you either listen or you don't.
Look I'm effing sick of toe the line wankers working in the media today and if the man off the radio wants to say eff you I'm thankful he still can.
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote: I'm a bit surprised some of you are slagging Bunce off for abusing people. Just tell him to f**k right off if you feel like it but underpin it with some decent opinion, as indeed some of you have done - he can take it.
Bunce is arguably the highest profile figure covering the sport in this country. He represents boxing on national radio, television and in the newspapers, and as such has greater responsibilities than most.tonyevs wrote: All of us - ok, most of us have gone off on one before now. I remember NorthEastBoxingFan going off on a very big one not so long ago.
So why not Buncey?
quote="nobby_nobbins"]nobby_nobbins wrote:Bunce is arguably the highest profile figure covering the sport in this country. He represents boxing on national radio, television and in the newspapers, and as such has greater responsibilities than most.tonyevs wrote: All of us - ok, most of us have gone off on one before now. I remember NorthEastBoxingFan going off on a very big one not so long ago.
So why not Buncey?
Bunce knows this site is the home of the hard core boxing fan, the people his audience figures depend on. Crapping on us is like a politician crapping on his own constituents. He risks driving away a key part of his audience, and without an audience there's no show, and without a show, no wages. Everyone says things they regret in the heat of the moment, but he's had plenty of time to cool off now and there's been no sign of an apology.[/quote]Final round wrote:
Because you don't pay his wages directly, he goes to work like the rest of us and drums up some guests for a sport we all love and you either listen or you don't.
Look I'm effing sick of toe the line wankers working in the media today and if the man off the radio wants to say eff you I'm thankful he still can.