Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
http://www.examiner.co.uk/sport-news/ot ... -28148568/
According to Sykes facebook Carl Johansson would not be ready. What do people think?
According to Sykes facebook Carl Johansson would not be ready. What do people think?
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Nice, safe fight for Sykes after that quite chilling KO.
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Was Buckland asked?
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Doubt it!Horse wrote:Was Buckland asked?
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
He is not a credible British champion until he avenges that defeat. I hope Truscott knocks him out.leforge wrote:Doubt it!
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Bit harsh !Horse wrote:He is not a credible British champion until he avenges that defeat. I hope Truscott knocks him out.leforge wrote:Doubt it!
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
He discredited the British title with his PrizeFighter loss and now he is fighting a feather fisted boxer who has just moved up in weight after two stoppage losses at domestic level. It is a cynical fight to make and I hope it backfires.leforge wrote:Bit harsh !
-
Wake up call
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1178
- Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Gary is going to be fighting Carl Johanneson now not Truscott. Just spoken to Carl's camp.
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Humbled Yorkshireman Gary Sykes could be defending his British super-featherweight title against Middlesbrough's Paul Truscott in Huddersfield on March 5.
Sykes, a real dynamo of a fighter from nearby Dewsbury, takes a while to warm-up and was caught cold by good Welshman Gary Buckland in the first round of a non-title affair at York Hall in November, losing his unbeaten record into the bargain.
This is 'must win' then for the 26-year-old champion who picked up the Lonsdale Belt in a thriller with Manchester's Andy Morris in Huddersfield last March and retained against Belfast's Kevin O'Hara few months later, also in Huddersfield, prior to the Buckland disaster.
Sykes outworked and outpointed Morris and O'Hara, after typically slow starts, and will probably struggle in the early rounds against the rangy, classy Truscott, but the challenger is not a banger and also has a history of busting up, so we can expect Sykes to come through, his punches flowing, on the way to a unanimous decision.
Sykes, a real dynamo of a fighter from nearby Dewsbury, takes a while to warm-up and was caught cold by good Welshman Gary Buckland in the first round of a non-title affair at York Hall in November, losing his unbeaten record into the bargain.
This is 'must win' then for the 26-year-old champion who picked up the Lonsdale Belt in a thriller with Manchester's Andy Morris in Huddersfield last March and retained against Belfast's Kevin O'Hara few months later, also in Huddersfield, prior to the Buckland disaster.
Sykes outworked and outpointed Morris and O'Hara, after typically slow starts, and will probably struggle in the early rounds against the rangy, classy Truscott, but the challenger is not a banger and also has a history of busting up, so we can expect Sykes to come through, his punches flowing, on the way to a unanimous decision.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23131
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Do you not trust Wake up call then Bennie?bennie wrote:Humbled Yorkshireman Gary Sykes could be defending his British super-featherweight title against Middlesbrough's Paul Truscott in Huddersfield on March 5.
Sykes, a real dynamo of a fighter from nearby Dewsbury, takes a while to warm-up and was caught cold by good Welshman Gary Buckland in the first round of a non-title affair at York Hall in November, losing his unbeaten record into the bargain.
This is 'must win' then for the 26-year-old champion who picked up the Lonsdale Belt in a thriller with Manchester's Andy Morris in Huddersfield last March and retained against Belfast's Kevin O'Hara few months later, also in Huddersfield, prior to the Buckland disaster.
Sykes outworked and outpointed Morris and O'Hara, after typically slow starts, and will probably struggle in the early rounds against the rangy, classy Truscott, but the challenger is not a banger and also has a history of busting up, so we can expect Sykes to come through, his punches flowing, on the way to a unanimous decision.
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
I haven't woken up myself yet, to be honest.mickey1975 wrote:Do you not trust Wake up call then Bennie?bennie wrote:Humbled Yorkshireman Gary Sykes could be defending his British super-featherweight title against Middlesbrough's Paul Truscott in Huddersfield on March 5.
Sykes, a real dynamo of a fighter from nearby Dewsbury, takes a while to warm-up and was caught cold by good Welshman Gary Buckland in the first round of a non-title affair at York Hall in November, losing his unbeaten record into the bargain.
This is 'must win' then for the 26-year-old champion who picked up the Lonsdale Belt in a thriller with Manchester's Andy Morris in Huddersfield last March and retained against Belfast's Kevin O'Hara few months later, also in Huddersfield, prior to the Buckland disaster.
Sykes outworked and outpointed Morris and O'Hara, after typically slow starts, and will probably struggle in the early rounds against the rangy, classy Truscott, but the challenger is not a banger and also has a history of busting up, so we can expect Sykes to come through, his punches flowing, on the way to a unanimous decision.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23131
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Well,you have just delivered a thorough analysis of Sykes-Truscott half asleep!bennie wrote:I haven't woken up myself yet, to be honest.mickey1975 wrote:Do you not trust Wake up call then Bennie?bennie wrote:Humbled Yorkshireman Gary Sykes could be defending his British super-featherweight title against Middlesbrough's Paul Truscott in Huddersfield on March 5.
Sykes, a real dynamo of a fighter from nearby Dewsbury, takes a while to warm-up and was caught cold by good Welshman Gary Buckland in the first round of a non-title affair at York Hall in November, losing his unbeaten record into the bargain.
This is 'must win' then for the 26-year-old champion who picked up the Lonsdale Belt in a thriller with Manchester's Andy Morris in Huddersfield last March and retained against Belfast's Kevin O'Hara few months later, also in Huddersfield, prior to the Buckland disaster.
Sykes outworked and outpointed Morris and O'Hara, after typically slow starts, and will probably struggle in the early rounds against the rangy, classy Truscott, but the challenger is not a banger and also has a history of busting up, so we can expect Sykes to come through, his punches flowing, on the way to a unanimous decision.
-
xXHAMMERXx
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 159
- Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 16:33
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
What happened to him fighting Jon kays. They said they was gonna reschedule it
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
I sleep in my anorak.mickey1975 wrote:Well,you have just delivered a thorough analysis of Sykes-Truscott half asleep!bennie wrote:I haven't woken up myself yet, to be honest.mickey1975 wrote: Do you not trust Wake up call then Bennie?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
#Horse wrote:He is not a credible British champion until he avenges that defeat. I hope Truscott knocks him out.leforge wrote:Doubt it!
you can keep hoping, there is no way on earth Trussie stops him.
I've got Sykes outworking him here
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
The board should have nominated Buckland as the mandatory challenger after the KO win in Prizefighter.
Would be a travesty if Sykes is able to win a Lonsdale for keeps without facing Buckland first.
Would be a travesty if Sykes is able to win a Lonsdale for keeps without facing Buckland first.
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Gutted its not kays! He's quite strong so maybe they want a non puncher in truscott! Shame!!xXHAMMERXx wrote:What happened to him fighting Jon kays. They said they was gonna reschedule it
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
I am amazed that something has got Horse riled up?
Would much rather see a Johanneson fight than a Truscott fight. I think Truscott is a good little boxer but he won't be able to keep Sykes off him. A Johanneson fight could answer some of the questions we all have about Sykes after Prizefighter, plus it'll be a much more exciting fight.
Although of course, he should really be made to fight Buckland if he wants to keep the belt. I know why they would want a Truscott fight as I'm sure he'll need a confidence booster against a guy that cannot hurt him. But as a champion, the fight should be against the bloke that beat him, especially in such emphatic circumstances
Would much rather see a Johanneson fight than a Truscott fight. I think Truscott is a good little boxer but he won't be able to keep Sykes off him. A Johanneson fight could answer some of the questions we all have about Sykes after Prizefighter, plus it'll be a much more exciting fight.
Although of course, he should really be made to fight Buckland if he wants to keep the belt. I know why they would want a Truscott fight as I'm sure he'll need a confidence booster against a guy that cannot hurt him. But as a champion, the fight should be against the bloke that beat him, especially in such emphatic circumstances
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
x2Lenny wrote:I am amazed that something has got Horse riled up?
Would much rather see a Johanneson fight than a Truscott fight. I think Truscott is a good little boxer but he won't be able to keep Sykes off him. A Johanneson fight could answer some of the questions we all have about Sykes after Prizefighter, plus it'll be a much more exciting fight.
Although of course, he should really be made to fight Buckland if he wants to keep the belt. I know why they would want a Truscott fight as I'm sure he'll need a confidence booster against a guy that cannot hurt him. But as a champion, the fight should be against the bloke that beat him, especially in such emphatic circumstances
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
i disagree totally, for a change, lenny.Lenny wrote:I am amazed that something has got Horse riled up?
Would much rather see a Johanneson fight than a Truscott fight. I think Truscott is a good little boxer but he won't be able to keep Sykes off him. A
Johansson ain't got it any more, IMO, or certainly not at 130lbs.
I think Truscott's neat skills will give Sykes much more pause than Johansson's flatfooted bomb-heaving.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
oh, and i think it would be just a little previous, to parachute Buckland in on the basis of an early, caught-him-cold KO in the lottery-esque 3 round Prizefighter format. personally.
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
What about his brave effort against Murray - who is leagues above Sykes.Counter-puncher wrote:oh, and i think it would be just a little previous, to parachute Buckland in on the basis of an early, caught-him-cold KO in the lottery-esque 3 round Prizefighter format. personally.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
aye, true, he's got halfway decent form at lightweight, if by halfway decent form I mean managing to take a sustained beating- 'brave effort'- in a not-too-competitive fight.stujones wrote:What about his brave effort against Murray - who is leagues above Sykes.Counter-puncher wrote:oh, and i think it would be just a little previous, to parachute Buckland in on the basis of an early, caught-him-cold KO in the lottery-esque 3 round Prizefighter format. personally.
i mean, do you give Barry Jones a shot at a british belt at 140 if he wins a Prizefighter at that weight?
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
Now that I've yawned and had a good, er, stretch, it looks like Dewsbury's Gary Sykes is defending his British super-featherweight title against Leeds veteran Carl Johanneson (instead of Paul Truscott) in a fascinating all-Yorkshire showdown in Huddersfield on March 5.
Johanneson used to hold the same title but that was a few years ago and he has gone over the mountain, although the last thing a puncher loses is his punch and "Ingemar" can really whack. This gives him a shout against the punchaholic Sykes, who needs a few rounds to work into his relentless rhythm and is vulnerable early in a fight.
We saw that in stunning fashion when Welsh underdog Gary Buckland, a former junk-food freak who fought as high as welterweight, dropped down and smashed Sykes in 45 seconds in a non-title affair in London in November, which is the champion's last fight. These quick, even brutal knockouts can be overcome (the long punishing losses tend to do the damage), so Sykes is favoured to get back to winning ways. He is younger, bigger, sharper and busier than the challenger, if not as hard-hitting, and yet nothing is ever guaranteed in a division like super-featherweight where, once upon a time, British champions could not hold on to the title for five minutes.
Sykes has just been knocked out for his first loss and goes straight back in with a proven puncher who might have one big effort left in him, who might even 'old man' him.
I go for Sykes, of course, but expect a rocky ride.
Johanneson used to hold the same title but that was a few years ago and he has gone over the mountain, although the last thing a puncher loses is his punch and "Ingemar" can really whack. This gives him a shout against the punchaholic Sykes, who needs a few rounds to work into his relentless rhythm and is vulnerable early in a fight.
We saw that in stunning fashion when Welsh underdog Gary Buckland, a former junk-food freak who fought as high as welterweight, dropped down and smashed Sykes in 45 seconds in a non-title affair in London in November, which is the champion's last fight. These quick, even brutal knockouts can be overcome (the long punishing losses tend to do the damage), so Sykes is favoured to get back to winning ways. He is younger, bigger, sharper and busier than the challenger, if not as hard-hitting, and yet nothing is ever guaranteed in a division like super-featherweight where, once upon a time, British champions could not hold on to the title for five minutes.
Sykes has just been knocked out for his first loss and goes straight back in with a proven puncher who might have one big effort left in him, who might even 'old man' him.
I go for Sykes, of course, but expect a rocky ride.
Last edited by bennie on 11 Feb 2011, 06:40, edited 1 time in total.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Gary Sykes v Paul Truscott March 5th
so its Johansson anyway ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)