heffron
Re: heffron
he ate a lot of shots there. good learning fight for him.
Re: heffron
Good fight- McCauley was a good opponent. They shared a round!
Re: heffron
why didn't Farnell tell him to box????
I heard comments early on after the 1st or 2nd from Farnell tellin him 'he was lookin good' ....... when he blatantly wasn't.
Is Farnell a little over rated as a trainer or just a little inexperienced????
I heard comments early on after the 1st or 2nd from Farnell tellin him 'he was lookin good' ....... when he blatantly wasn't.
Is Farnell a little over rated as a trainer or just a little inexperienced????
Re: heffron
Looked fairly average. Seems that Gary Hyde snared the best sibling.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: heffron
Everyone is entitled to an off night, esp one so young with a long way to go in the game.
Heffron looked a monster in the ams. I reckon he will still come good in the pros given time.
Heffron looked a monster in the ams. I reckon he will still come good in the pros given time.
-
jackhammer
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 18:04
Re: heffron
TerribleTerry wrote:Everyone is entitled to an off night, esp one so young with a long way to go in the game.
Heffron looked a monster in the ams. I reckon he will still come good in the pros given time.
spot on why is it so many posters moan that young prospects are given easy opponents then winge and say they didnt do very well when they are put up against tough ones like macauley you cant have it both ways well done ronnie.
Re: heffron
jackhammer wrote:TerribleTerry wrote:Everyone is entitled to an off night, esp one so young with a long way to go in the game.
Heffron looked a monster in the ams. I reckon he will still come good in the pros given time.
spot on why is it so many posters moan that young prospects are given easy opponents then winge and say they didnt do very well when they are put up against tough ones like macauley you cant have it both ways well done ronnie.
His fight tonight will teach him more than his previous 4 or 5. It's what he needs.
-
canonball1234
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 436
- Joined: 16 May 2009, 20:20
Re: heffron
Kevin is very game well done to heffron I rember wen I boxed him he was showboating lol
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: heffron
I thought Kevin Macauley not only showed great toughness and chin, but also showed some decent skills and was always trying to win. He was a very good opponent.canonball1234 wrote:Kevin is very game well done to heffron I rember wen I boxed him he was showboating lol
-
Wake up call
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1178
- Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10
Re: heffron
To be fair, very few look good against Macauley.
-
johnnygreaves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 910
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 07:41
Re: heffron
Kev is extremely hard & v few look good against him . Heffron will do better against most winning fighters. Don't knock too much. He's only just got going. Kev is tough as old boots
Re: heffron
i was actually impressed with ronnie, its the first time ive watched him, ive read great reviews of him as an amateur, his obviously got alot to learn, he needs to be fighting 6 times a year atleast, thats see how he develops, i think arnie has alot of talent in his gym and he can take them all the way...
Re: heffron
heffron is young & is realising that fighting tough men is diffrent to blowing away boy's. he has great attributes. but like frank said he has to learn to jab & chip away.i dont think he'd overtrained, i think he tried to hard & put more effort then what was needed to & it's hard to switch from that once committed, it's a valuable lesson.
Re: heffron
That was the most entertaining fight of the night for me.
Watching it later on SKY Heffron seemed almost in awe of what FW was saying (which was common sense) so maybe it's just an age thing. His eyes seemed to swell up, could be a problem in later fights?
Watching it later on SKY Heffron seemed almost in awe of what FW was saying (which was common sense) so maybe it's just an age thing. His eyes seemed to swell up, could be a problem in later fights?
Re: heffron
My lad Jonson Mc Clumpha had a good fight with him a few weeks ago it was Jonson 2nd fight and a big step up for his 2nd pro fight ,Kevin is a big test for any one and he comes to fight

Re: heffron
Was impressed with Heffron, he was a bit hot headed and could have made it easier, but I liked the body shots he was whipping in, looks a good prospect. Just needs to tightwen it up and use his skills but all in all a pretty good performance for one so young against one of the better 'journeymen'.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: heffron
You wont see many better journeymen than Macauley this year.Contrast him with some of the foreign crap that gets brought over.He was excellent and gave Heffron a very good learning fight.
-
Newport Daz
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 687
- Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26
Re: heffron
Absolulty spot on mate. Easy knockovers will do nothing for him in the long run. It was a great fight imo with Macauley trying to win in every round. I don't know whether British journeymen are more expensive than foreign imports, but I would like to see them used as often as possible as they seem to give so much more in the ring than just being there to collect their wages.mickey1975 wrote:You wont see many better journeymen than Macauley this year.Contrast him with some of the foreign crap that gets brought over.He was excellent and gave Heffron a very good learning fight.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: heffron
British journeyman must be cheaper surely..4-6rounder against a home boy must be £500-£750 plus expenses(i could be well out with them figures)Newport Daz wrote:Absolulty spot on mate. Easy knockovers will do nothing for him in the long run. It was a great fight imo with Macauley trying to win in every round. I don't know whether British journeymen are more expensive than foreign imports, but I would like to see them used as often as possible as they seem to give so much more in the ring than just being there to collect their wages.mickey1975 wrote:You wont see many better journeymen than Macauley this year.Contrast him with some of the foreign crap that gets brought over.He was excellent and gave Heffron a very good learning fight.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: heffron
Couldn't agree more - he was very durable, full of heart, always throwing educated punches.Newport Daz wrote:Absolulty spot on mate. Easy knockovers will do nothing for him in the long run. It was a great fight imo with Macauley trying to win in every round. I don't know whether British journeymen are more expensive than foreign imports, but I would like to see them used as often as possible as they seem to give so much more in the ring than just being there to collect their wages.mickey1975 wrote:You wont see many better journeymen than Macauley this year.Contrast him with some of the foreign crap that gets brought over.He was excellent and gave Heffron a very good learning fight.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11788
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: heffron
Nothing wrong with taking a few punches in a learning fight, as long as Ronnie learns from it. Still plenty of time for him to improve, McCauley is a tough boxer who doesn't get stopped often, and it was only Ronnie's 5th fight.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: heffron
Macauley will have been on more than double that for that fight.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:British journeyman must be cheaper surely..4-6rounder against a home boy must be £500-£750 plus expenses(i could be well out with them figures)Newport Daz wrote:Absolulty spot on mate. Easy knockovers will do nothing for him in the long run. It was a great fight imo with Macauley trying to win in every round. I don't know whether British journeymen are more expensive than foreign imports, but I would like to see them used as often as possible as they seem to give so much more in the ring than just being there to collect their wages.mickey1975 wrote:You wont see many better journeymen than Macauley this year.Contrast him with some of the foreign crap that gets brought over.He was excellent and gave Heffron a very good learning fight.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: heffron
Really?? i was just guessing at them figures.....i aint got a clue matemickey1975 wrote:Macauley will have been on more than double that for that fight.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:British journeyman must be cheaper surely..4-6rounder against a home boy must be £500-£750 plus expenses(i could be well out with them figures)Newport Daz wrote: Absolulty spot on mate. Easy knockovers will do nothing for him in the long run. It was a great fight imo with Macauley trying to win in every round. I don't know whether British journeymen are more expensive than foreign imports, but I would like to see them used as often as possible as they seem to give so much more in the ring than just being there to collect their wages.
-
saturday_kid
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 847
- Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05
Re: heffron
Really enjoyed that fight.
McCauley is a helluva lot better than his record, if he didn't fight away from home a lot and sold more tickets he'd be classed as an outside domestic contender, he's won a Midlands strap aswell.
McCauley is a helluva lot better than his record, if he didn't fight away from home a lot and sold more tickets he'd be classed as an outside domestic contender, he's won a Midlands strap aswell.