welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post Reply
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15690
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by elmersalsa »

Hello folks!!!

I got another great matchup between 2 of the most intelligent and smartest fighters of the past 25 years. Even though Leonard was one of my favorites, I wouldn't be surprised if "Sweet Pea" wins. I go with Whitaker on this one by decision. :TU: :TU: :TU: :TU: :TU:
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15690
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

lightheavyweights: Bob Foster vs Matthew Saad Muhammad

Post by elmersalsa »

Hello again!!!

How about this great matchup???: One dominated the division with a hell of a punch making 14 defenses (Bob Foster) but couldn't take a lick, specially from the heavyweights. The other (Saad Muhammad) was brute and strong and well-conditioned but lacked the boxing skills of Foster and had a decent punch but not like Foster's. He ha a better chin than Foster.

I think Foster wouldn't be able to knock Saad Muhammad out and lose by a 12th round TKO. :TU: :TU: :TU:
SUGARRAYSMELEE
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 139
Joined: 31 Jan 2011, 03:27

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by SUGARRAYSMELEE »

Very, very tough to call.

I could see it going either way, however, I tend to think Leonard would win more often than not because he has more power, quicker hands, and is always moving.
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

Leonard wins this shit easy. Whitaker made his bones entirely off of being faster than his opponents. Leonard would be on top of him all night as he's taller, rangier, and has faster hands. Pernell's only hope would be too act like a boppo-clown and "dodge" all of Leonard's shots that would nonetheless scuff up his face and have him lose a wide decision.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by dempseyfire »

Leonard by clear decision. Whitaker beating Chavez at 147 is one thing . . beating an ATG prime welter like Leonard with speed and power is completly another. The only thing Whitaker would succeed in would be making it boring to watch.

Foster vs Saad is a little more interesting, but I still have to favor Foster who if he didn't KO him could still win via the long jab and quicker counters. Foster is definitely a league above Lopez and Johnson.
llabwons
Cruiserweight
Posts: 34
Joined: 27 Dec 2010, 10:58

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by llabwons »

Whilst Whitaker had the tools to potentially beat any lightweight in history and a fair few ATG welters, no way he beat's Leonard. Leonard was just as fast, but with KO power.

Leonard by either late KO or more likely UD.
Idisagree
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 19:49

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by Idisagree »

At Welter Whitaker was good but I think he was not the same fighter. At 135 he was much, much better. Leonard should win this one by Decision.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by King Carlos »

Diamond WEAPON wrote:Leonard wins this shit easy. Whitaker made his bones entirely off of being faster than his opponents. Leonard would be on top of him all night as he's taller, rangier, and has faster hands. Pernell's only hope would be too act like a boppo-clown and "dodge" all of Leonard's shots that would nonetheless scuff up his face and have him lose a wide decision.
The bolded bit is absurd, but I agree with the consensus. Leonard was just the better, more physically imposing Welterweight. There's no way I can see Whitaker winning this one. No natural Lightweight outside of Duran (who had the correct style to do so, Whitaker does not) is beating Leonard.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: welterweights: Sugar Ray Leonard vs Pernell Whitaker

Post by Ezzard »

King Carlos wrote:
Diamond WEAPON wrote:Leonard wins this shit easy. Whitaker made his bones entirely off of being faster than his opponents. Leonard would be on top of him all night as he's taller, rangier, and has faster hands. Pernell's only hope would be too act like a boppo-clown and "dodge" all of Leonard's shots that would nonetheless scuff up his face and have him lose a wide decision.
The bolded bit is absurd, but I agree with the consensus. Leonard was just the better, more physically imposing Welterweight. There's no way I can see Whitaker winning this one. No natural Lightweight outside of Duran (who had the correct style to do so, Whitaker does not) is beating Leonard.
Carlos, would you give Armstrong a chance with Leonard?
Post Reply