Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Dioufy »

oliverfennell wrote:
Dioufy wrote:Easier to do when you're in Vietnam or Laos, or wherever. I find it impossible to avoid the result.
Thailand, to be precise. Well, yes, easier, but hardly impossible. Remember I have lived in Britain far longer than I have lived here and, as said, I used to routinely and successfully avoid results all the way through til midnight on a Sunday when that was when the BBC showed its international boxing.

The remote control thing is just your own foible, and the neighbour thing is just a chance in a million. It could happen to any of us, but with a bit of discipline and the proper precautions, it really isn't difficult.
It's been spoilt lots of ways, and most of the time, not through my own fault. If you're interested I can give you more 'one-in-a-million' examples. I'll tell you what, sod's law isn't a big enough word when it comes to avoiding boxing results and myself.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

Thank you for telling us which precautions are proper Oliver — we might have slipped up otherwise
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Dioufy »

Glyn Leach wrote:Thank you for telling us which precautions are proper Oliver — we might have slipped up otherwise
:lol:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13317
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by MightyWarrior »

I managed to avoid the Holyfield/Douglas result for a whole day, which is tricky for a real HW title fight, even pre internet. On way home from work I sat on the tube, feeling pretty pleased to have made it and almost there, when the bloke opposite me opens up his late news Standard, presenting me with the big headline "BUSTED", with a picture of a fat bloke asleep on the canvas underneath.
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by lefthook82 »

I'm a bit funny whne it comes to spoilers. As long there is a stoppage I can watch the fight, even if happens in the later rounds. If I hear it has gone to points then forget about it, not interested

This fight shouldnt be too hard to avoid for those not staying around Justin's. Stay the fcuk off the internet, remember to change the channel on BBC/ITV News when its time for sports and dont take calls.

Additionally, if feasible don't actually watch the coverage until you hear the ring announcer introducing the fighers, and remember to put it on mute

I remember hearing that for the Froch/Taylor fight the presenter said before the fight 'this one is worth the wait', with a smile on his face. Basically giving away the result to those who had managed to avoid it all day
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

The worst one is when someone you know blows it for you. 'That's all right mate, not to worry, I would have looked it up on teletext anyway.' Yeah right. You just effed up my life you effing cock, eff off and die in pain.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by J »

Glyn Leach wrote:The worst one is when someone you know blows it for you. 'That's all right mate, not to worry, I would have looked it up on teletext anyway.' Yeah right. You just effed up my life you effing cock, eff off and die in pain.

possibly a little harsh. :OhYes:
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Scottrf »

Glyn Leach wrote:The worst one is when someone you know blows it for you.
According to Princess you werent complaining.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

That's just for a Southern Area flyweight eliminator — and I walked into that, didn't I :(
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

Killed my friends years ago Kinky, way too risky
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

It's all about levels. Some people get far more angsty than others about boxing — and all joking aside, I do get very angsty. I can't watch boxing with even my closest friends. It's way too personal for that. Even if they know what they're talking about the sound of their voices irritates me. Just shut up and let me watch it properly. At ringside? Forget it, way too many irritants. Impossible, like someone's let a moron bomb off, designed to ruin my existence. I need a controlled environment — controlled by me. I can watch it with my missus because she's trained up and she knows the rules — don't talk unless I do first, basically (not so big an ask — two hours hun, you can run the show the rest of the time). All of which sounds pretty sad. Or not. (Big boy. Adios.) But that's the level I'm at. What level are you at?
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by J »

thats defo a touch of OCD Glynn..i do understand though I have an eight year old who insists on asking me what colour England playin in the rugby 7 times during a game. And who do i want to win at least 5 times a half.

boxing is on too late in general for him to watch so i get peace n quiet on the odd occasion i get to see any frikkin boxing out here.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Dioufy »

Counter Puncher spoilt Moore/Rhodes for me via text. If you read this, CP, then understand that I still haven't fully forgiven you for that.

:box:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Dioufy »

Glyn Leach wrote:It's all about levels. Some people get far more angsty than others about boxing — and all joking aside, I do get very angsty. I can't watch boxing with even my closest friends. It's way too personal for that. Even if they know what they're talking about the sound of their voices irritates me. Just shut up and let me watch it properly. At ringside? Forget it, way too many irritants. Impossible, like someone's let a moron bomb off, designed to ruin my existence. I need a controlled environment — controlled by me. I can watch it with my missus because she's trained up and she knows the rules — don't talk unless I do first, basically (not so big an ask — two hours hun, you can run the show the rest of the time). All of which sounds pretty sad. Or not. (Big boy. Adios.) But that's the level I'm at. What level are you at?
You're a sicko, Glyn.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

It's not right, is it. Do you think I can sue someone over it? Mmm. Nippers, they get a lot of leeway, rightfully so. Must be why they put boxing on after the watershed. Wondered what it was for.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by J »

well hopefully so they can thear me shouting come on xxxxx smash him a new asshole....though we are 4 hours behind so he did watch haye valuev and loved it.

To be honest wasnt much to shout over during that snoozefest though.

he does read Boxing monthly though once im done with it...well looks at the pictures and reads some of it. :TU:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by orbtastic »

Dioufy wrote:Counter Puncher spoilt Moore/Rhodes for me via text. If you read this, CP, then understand that I still haven't fully forgiven you for that.

:box:
He was excited, you'll have to forgive him.

One of the BBBoC officials spoiled Hall/Small for me/us when watching the boxing at the York Hall, was not impressed as it was waiting for me on SKY+
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Glyn Leach »

I like the cut of your lad's jib J. Fine parenting sir!
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by J »

sports mad...cricket number 1 then rugby & boxing....cant think who he might be influenced by though i love all three equally :lol: :lol: :lol:

on a serious note he has some talent for the cricket playing under 11's at the age of 8 and getting man of the match awards 3 yeara bove his age, gonna be a better player than i ever was if he sticks with it ..potential there to do well. Litte bastard stuffed me the other day playing car park cricket. :oops:
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

BIGMARK wrote:Matty Hatton isnt big news in Spain so i should imagine i will have no problems avoiding the result as Boxing here is basically Tyson or Al. Recently i stuck up a picture of Javier Castillejo amounst the boxing pictures in my bar no one seemed to know who he was and those few he did told him how he beat Oscar De La Hoya :o . These days of Sky+, being old, the extra hour difference and having kids i rarely stay up and watch a US fight live but having to wait until sunday evening is a weird one but obviously Sky have there reasons for showing it so late.
Where you based BM if u dont mind me asking?Mainland?
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by n1ebf »

freddydoesdallas wrote:Is this the way it's going to be for the lesser known fighters going for world titles now? Didn't the same thing happen with Munroe?

Hatton should be very complimented by that little comparison!
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by reggaereggae »

Glyn Leach wrote:Nice one Edwin, thanks for keeping us posted and well done to Sky — this would have been a bad one not to show.

As a few people have posted, the time of the screening isn't exactly fan friendly — to complain overly would seem churlish, but it does cause a few very valid concerns that I'd be grateful if you could take on board and pass on to the powers that be.

As a fan yourself, you will know how important it is to watch a fight with no clue whatsoever as to what is going to happen when the first bell sounds. To this end, please have a word with Dave Darts, or whoever will present, and explain that opening comments such as 'don't blink' (translation: short fight) and 'sit back and enjoy the action' (translation: long fight) rob us of that element of suspense which is so crucial to the enjoyment of a fight. Also, any trailers for the show on Sunday that contain action from the fight would do the same — it's been noted that on Fight Nights the 'join us after the break' links often feature action from the next fight to be shown, which tells the viewer 'this one didn't end with an alarmingly quick KO then'. We really don't need to know that, it robs us of some of the anticipation and enjoyment.
The points I make could be applied to any non-live fight situation, but as those of us who will not be choosing the live internet option will spend most of Sunday actively trying to avoid the result, it would be a shame if Sky was to undermine its good work and our efforts (which will be considerable, it's horribly tense trying to avoid a result — and requires a fair degree of self sacrifice [no TV, no radio, no internet, the vetting of texts and phone calls]) by blowing it with ill-thought out 'wiseguy' comments or trailers.

Cheers chap.

As an aside, am I the only one out there who can't believe he's so excited about watching a Matthew Hatton fight? Fair play to him, this never would have seemed possible for most of his career.
I am so glad you brought this up! That drives me mad and ruins all tension....... :TU:
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by oliverfennell »

Dioufy wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:Thank you for telling us which precautions are proper Oliver — we might have slipped up otherwise
:lol:
Heh, well it may indeed seem like I'm stating the obvious, but the way some people are going on, you'd think avoiding the result of a boxing match is as difficult as avoiding getting wet in the rain.

Dioufy just sounds like he's got some bad boxing mojo. He must have been Frankie Carbo in a previous life.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by dondada »

Sky must come on here and feel like topping themselves. Always good to get feedback, of course, but fair play to them for showing this in the first place.

Can't see me making it until 6.30pm mind for the anorak reasons Glyn outlines, but I'll try.

MW's suggestion of a switch of slots with the Sat Night Fights repeat is a good un but I'm sure there must be difficulties involved...esp when Magic Matt ices the ginge in round one.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hatton v Alvarez delayed coverage

Post by Counter-puncher »

Glyn Leach wrote:It's all about levels. Some people get far more angsty than others about boxing — and all joking aside, I do get very angsty. I can't watch boxing with even my closest friends. It's way too personal for that. Even if they know what they're talking about the sound of their voices irritates me. Just shut up and let me watch it properly. At ringside? Forget it, way too many irritants. Impossible, like someone's let a moron bomb off, designed to ruin my existence. I need a controlled environment — controlled by me. I can watch it with my missus because she's trained up and she knows the rules — don't talk unless I do first, basically (not so big an ask — two hours hun, you can run the show the rest of the time). All of which sounds pretty sad. Or not. (Big boy. Adios.) But that's the level I'm at. What level are you at?
:bow:
Post Reply